Tag Archives: The Truth About Masks | COVID-19 Facts

The PILL that everyone wants…

The pill that everyone wants…but can’t seem to swallow.-Anonymous

If you still use PCR tests every time you get cold or flu symptoms and you believe the results, you’re going to fall hook, line, and sinker for the whole Monkeypox scam.

You are the carbon footprint that they want reduced.

Continue reading The PILL that everyone wants…

WATCH || The COVID-19 Shot – Seeking the Ultimate Truth (Part 2)

Freedom Alive™
The COVID-19 Shot – Seeking the Ultimate Truth (Part 2)

God tells us in Hosea that His people are destroyed for lack of knowledge. And we’re seeing that happen in recent days as some allow fear to drive their decisions instead of research, facts and discernment.

Dr. Lee Merritt was one of the first doctors to speak truth about COVID and the shots. Now she returns on this episode of Liberty Counsel’s TV program Freedom Alive™ to share what is really happening with pharmaceutical companies that concerns your health.

Watch now!

Source: Liberty Counsel

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

The COVID-19 Shot – Seeking the Ultimate Truth (Part 1)

Freedom Alive™

The COVID-19 Shot – Seeking the Ultimate Truth (Part 1)

Dr. Lee Merritt completed an Orthopaedic Surgery Residency in the United States Navy and served nine years as a Navy physician and surgeon. Dr. Merritt has been in the private practice of Orthopaedic and Spinal Surgery since 1995.

On this episode of Liberty Counsel’s TV program, Freedom Alive™, Dr. Merritt returns to share more current insight from a scientific basis about the COVID virus and the shot. For example, the shot doesn’t prevent transmission and in fact, it increases the virus.

Watch now!

Source: Liberty Counsel

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

BREAKING: They’re Coming After Our Children, Again

Did you hear? On April 25, 2022, the failed Ebola drug Remdesivir was approved by the FDA for “treatment” of Covid-19 in babies as young as 28 days old and as small as seven pounds! This is the exact same drug that has been wreaking carnage throughout hospitals since Fauci and Company approved the rigid CARES Act hospital protocol, along with bonus payments for treatment of Covid-19 with Remdesivir.

This is beyond shocking. Repeatedly, Remdesivir has been shown to be completely ineffective at treating Covid-19 in adults (even WHO studies show this) and to have severe side effects, including multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS), kidney failure and dialysis, and septic shock.

While studies of inexpensive and familiar early treatment meds continue to demonstrate safety and effectiveness, the same cannot be said about Remdesivir. What makes this plot even more sinister, is this failed drug has even been approved for babies and children who are displaying only mild symptoms of Covid-19!

As we at AFLDS have preached for over two years, children and infants are at statistically zero risk of death from Covid-19, and yet they now can legally be treated with what is essentially poison. This is one of the worst decisions of the corrupt FDA.

While the Covid-19 chatter may seem quieter, rest assured that they are far from done pushing this narrative. Now is not the time to become complacent, as they are continuing to create ways to attack our most vulnerable and put our children at grave risk.

Source: https://www.americasfrontlinedoctors.org/

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

The Foegen effect

Winter of severe illness and death didn’t work so now they are planning a summer of starvation and famine.

MEDICINE JOURNAL

The Foegen effect

A mechanism by which facemasks contribute to the COVID-19 case fatality rate

Fögen, Zacharias MD∗

“The “Foegen effect” theory; that is, deep re-inhalation of hypercondensed droplets or pure virions caught in facemasks as droplets can worsen prognosis and might be linked to long-term effects of COVID-19 infection. While the “Foegen effect” is proven in vivo in an animal model, further research is needed to fully understand it.

This study revealed that wearing facemasks might impose a great risk on individuals, which would not be mitigated by a reduction in the infection rate. The use of facemasks, therefore, might be unfit, if not contraindicated, as an epidemiologic intervention against COVID-19. Proving or disproving the “Foegen effect” using experimental studies as described above should be a priority to public health scientists.”

https://journals.lww.com/md-journal/Fulltext/2022/02180/The_Foegen_effect__A_mechanism_by_which_facemasks.60.aspx

Dr. Ariyana Love, ND, [May 3, 2022]
The Foegen Effect: Why Face Masks Increase the Death Rate of COVID-19 – Zacharias Fögen

“My study on masks has finally appeared in the prestigious journal Medicine.

My study, based on the U.S. state of Kansas..: case mortality was significantly lower in counties without mandatory masks. Mandatory masking increased case mortality there by 85%.

The reason for this is what I call the Foegen effect: deep re-inhalation of condensed droplets or pure virions which were trapped in the mask as droplets can worsen the prognosis. Each of these steps has been documented in the literature.

A peer-reviewed study in the journal Cureus shows that there is no association between mask compliance and case numbers in Europe, but there is a statistically significant positive association between mask compliance and deaths. This means: more mask use, same number of cases, but more deaths.”

https://dailysceptic.org/2022/05/02/the-foegen-effect-why-face-masks-increase-the-death-rate-of-covid-19/

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

Microplastic particles — present in many COVID-19 masks

The study from Great Britain discovered microplastic particles — present in many COVID-19 masks — in the lung tissue of 11 out of 13 patients undergoing surgery.

Polypropylene (PP) and polyethylene terephthalate (PET) were the most prevalent substances present in the lungs.

The plastic dust and microscopic debris comprises the same plastics used to manufacture the ubiquitous surgical masks worn by hundreds of millions of people around the world as mandated by governments in an attempt to halt the spread of COVID-19.

https://westernstandardonline.com/2022/04/study-shows-microplastics-found-in-covid-masks-present-in-patients-lungs/

Chris Schaefer is a respirator specialist and onsite training expert based in Edmonton, Alta. He has been teaching and conducting respirator fit testing for more than 20 years with his company, SafeCom Training Services Inc. His clients include government departments, Canada’s military, Alberta Health Services, educational institutions, and private industry. Schaefer is a published author and a recognized authority on the subject of respirators and masks.

The Western Standard asked Schaefer if he believed surgical masks of the type used by millions of Canadians, and people throughout the world, presented a significant risk of microplastic inhalation from the masks themselves. He began by clarifying that the face covering generally referred to as a ‘mask’ is not, in fact, a mask, at all.

Schaefer refers to COVID-19 face coverings as “breathing barriers.”

“What has been mandated in hospitals and through the general public through this whole COVID-19 agenda, are not masks. They don’t meet the legal definition [of a mask,] “Shaefer said. “A [proper] mask has engineered breathing openings in front of mouth and nose to ensure easy and effortless breathing. A breathing barrier is closed both over mouth and nose. And by doing that, it captures carbon dioxide that you exhale, forces you to re-inhale it, causing a reduction in your inhaled oxygen levels and causes excessive carbon dioxide. So they’re not safe to wear.”


These breathing barriers are not respirators. These fibres break down to between .2 mm, and the large ones are five mm. So they’re totally inhalable, they break down very small and and, well, what that’s going to do to people in the in the form of lung function — as well as toxicity overload in their body.

Source: Dr. Ariyana Love, ND

You have to understand, most of these people are not ready to be unplugged. And many of them are so inured, so hopelessly dependent on the system, that the will fight to protect it. – Morpfies, The Matrix

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

AFLDS: No Good Reason to Jab Kids

And speaking of news, I want to encourage you to visit AFLDS’ FRONTLINE FLASH short news video website.

One of our latest is particularly good and features Dr. Peterson Pierre. It’s called “No Good Reason to Jab Kids.” Here are the 6 reasons not to jab your kids:

1. The Vaccines are Experimental—not FDA approved.
2. The Vaccines are not safe—over 1 million adverse events have been recorded, and over 40,000 deaths…
3. The Vaccines are not effective—they don’t stop Covid and they don’t stop transmission…
4. The Vaccines are not necessary—natural immunity is far safer and more effective…
5. Omnicom is mild…
6. Kids under 18 are 51 times more likely to die from the shot than they are to die from Covid if not vaccinated.

I encourage you to click below to check out FRONT LINE FLASH. This is news you won’t hear anywhere else unless you tune into FRONTLINE FLASH website.

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

The Truth Will Set You Free

Kristina Lawson, president of the California Medical Board, is on the warpath to expose “manipulative…anti-science zealots” like you and me.

One of her biggest targets was UCLA Medical Center anesthesiologist Dr. Christopher Rake.

What is surprising is Lawson, head of the California Medical Board, has no medical or scientific training at all, and is actually a land use and environmental lawyer.

Lawson has been hunting down and prosecuting doctors who dissent from the “vaccine” propaganda. Her board threatens doctors who rely on medical evidence and implicitly promotes insiders who toe the tyrannical line and uphold the lies.

These lies have cost human lives, and to cover their tracks, the medical board defended medical malpractice, sweeping these killings under the rug.

All this and more, is revealed in our AFLDS Frontline Films production, Doc Tracy: Physician Investigator, aimed at exposing the power, corruption and lies of Big Pharma, Big Government, and Big Media.

And even though Google, YouTube, Facebook, and Amazon continue to censor AFLDS in their attempt to shut us down, we continue to break through their censorship. People are searching for the truth, and they are finding it with AFLDS.

In fact, the first episode of Doc Tracy has made breaking headlines in the LA TimesMSN News, and other major media outlets. As usual, the writers “reporting” clearly did not even watch the episode.

Doc Tracy has reached over 5,000,000 views so far. That’s five million.

But, we need your help to continue to expose this evil alliance and share the truth. AFLDS will continue to produce more Doc Tracy episodes to reach millions more Americans. This is why I am writing you today. AFLDS does not receive corporate funds, or taxpayer dollars. We rely solely upon your generosity.

Please contribute $25, $35, or even $50 or more to help press us reach 5 million more new viewers. Perhaps you are in a position to give $21 ($1 for each minute of our short Doc Tracy film) so we can keep fighting the Axis of Evil on all fronts.

Doc Tracy is vital. Millions of Americans have been lied to, and they need to hear the truth. But we cannot divert resources from our critical legal team or our top-tier news media outlet, Frontline News.

To keep these tyrants off balance, we need to keep starting fires, quicker than they can put them out.

The truth will set you free, but it must first be known. Help us give people the message that nobody in power wants you to hear.

For Liberty,

Source:America’s Frontline Doctors

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

Big Tech Plays Favorites When It Comes to Censorship

At a time when forthright social-media posts are slapped with “fact-check” labels, suppressed, or just plain taken down, why are mainstream media companies getting a free pass when they start to question vaccine imperialism? In recent letters to Meta and Twitter, our attorneys have called out the glaring inconsistencies in the way these platforms are applying their “misinformation” policies.

On March 29, 2022, the very day the CDC authorized a second and third COVID-19 booster injection for certain Americans, the New York Times (NYT), in a surprising turn, published an article arguing that the scientific evidence for giving a fourth shot was “incomplete, at best, that the only study backing it was “deeply flawed,” and that “most people are already well protected from severe illness.” It posted links to the piece on both Meta/Facebook and Twitter.

In the article titled, “Should You Get Another Covid Booster?,” the NYT took aim at Pfizer and Moderna for plugging the idea “without much evidence to back up their claims” and at the FDA for going along with this. The article even discussed “disadvantages” of another dose such as “diminishing results” and “side effects like fever, headache, fatigue and joint aches.”

Why, then, did Meta not sanction NYT for content that “implicitly discourages vaccination” or for material “promoting that others not get the COVID-19 vaccine,” as set out in its “vaccine misinformation” rules?

As our attorneys wrote to Meta, “Meta is clearly allowing this Article from a prominent news media company to exist on its platform when the Article directly contradicts America’s key public-health infrastructure organization—the CDC—even though Meta has taken action against countless other users who have posed similar questions or viewpoints that differ from the FDA and CDC recommendations.”

ICAN made similar observations in a separate letter to Twitter, this time questioning why the NYT got a free pass when Twitter has been far more punitive with other users who, for example, merely “highlight facts in official government data.” For example, Twitter labeled as “misleading” a tweet that posted a link to the U.K.’s Office for National Statistics (ONS) website because the tweet repeated the headline of an article analyzing the data: “Deaths among Teenage Boys have increased by 63% in the UK since they started getting the Covid-19 Vaccine according to ONS data.”

So it seems the NYT can freely back-pedal on its earlier narratives that cheerled, defended, and pushed at any cost COVID injections, while less favored outlets and individuals must endure the slings and arrows of big-tech censorship. As our attorneys’ letters demanded, these platforms must explain why they are inconsistently and unfairly enforcing their COVID’19 policies among users. If Meta and Twitter can exhibit such favoritism in applying their own rules, then those rules were disingenuous in the first place!

To share this legal update, please use this link: https://www.icandecide.org/ican_press/big-tech-plays-favorites-when-it-comes-to-censorship/

Source: https://www.icandecide.org

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

Genocide in Costa Rica – EXPIRED COVID VACCINE POISON

LOS GENOCIDAS EN PAÍS DE COSTA RICA 🇨🇷www.ministeriodesalud.go.cr Veterinario ZEPOLITO Daniel Salas Peraza y Román Macaya www.ccss.sa.cr CCSS CHORIZERO ASESINO Genocida quiere asesinar a la población con una sustancia experimental y también VENCIDA ASESINOS GENOCIDAS pero CAERÁN PAGARÁN POR FALSANTES GENOCIDIOS DE LESA HUMANIDAD EN COSTA RICA EN LA POBLACIÓN.

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.