Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.
Dr. Jane Blows open the DOD’s dirty tricks being played on our military as they shuffle and race to ship out Pfizer Biontech EUA vials of God knows what, and slapping on labels with conflicting temperature instructions, untraceable manufacturing origination sites, and made up LOT numbers, many of these vials are showing up at military bases with their internal temperature alarms having gone off, and they’re being told by Ft. Detrick personnel to “just change the expiration dates” randomly.
And in the Natural Health Series, Bee Pollen – what is it and how can it help you remain medically independent and healthy without traditional medicine; and the show concludes with a recap of 3 embalmers – out of many that are pulling never before seen clots out of the jabbed – first seen on the Dr. Jane Ruby show in February.
23/6/2022 – Watch as Rep. Jim Jordan exposes the Biden Admin’s lies on vaccine efficacy, as Deborah Birx testimony throws a monkey wrench into the narrative.
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.
https://expose-news.com/2022/06/15/pfizer-documents-800-people-never-finished-trial/
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.
Health Freedom Defense Fund, [Jun 3, 2022]
Naomi Wolf published “Dear Friends, Sorry to Announce a Genocide” as the title of her latest Substack article that provides an update on what some 3.000 volunteers have discovered as they analyze the 55,000 internal Pfizer documents which the FDA had asked a court to keep under wraps for 75 years. By court order, these documents were forcibly disclosed.
These 3.000 volunteers include qualified and credentialed doctors, RNs, biostatisticians, medical fraud examiners, lab clinicians and research scientists.
https://naomiwolf.substack.com/p/dear-friends-sorry-to-announce-a?s=r
Mafia-Style Bribery and Racketeering: Perverse Pharma Kickbacks for NIH Personnel
Openthebooks.org discovered $350 million in NIH royalties, dividing up to $21,000 per scientist.
Dr. Naomi Wolf: “What really makes me angry, among all the things that make you angry if you’re an American taxpayer, is that they did a FOIA … but they’re so redacted, you really can’t follow the money.”
truthsocial.com/@VigilantFox/108413806097047372
@VigilantFox | Rumble | Full Video
#naomiwolf #corruption #usa 
Pfizer’s “Secret” Report on the COVID Vaccine: Beyond Manslaughter
“The following video interview with Prof. Michel Chossudovsky pertains to the Confidential Pfizer Report released as part of a Freedom of Information (FOI) procedure.
The report is a bombshell. The vaccine was launched in mid-December 2020. By the end of February 2021, ‘Pfizer had already received more than 1,200 reports of deaths allegedly caused by the vaccine and tens of thousands of reported adverse events, including 23 cases of spontaneous abortions out of 270 pregnancies and over 2,000 reports of cardiac disorders’ …
@Covid19vaccinevictims 
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.
Dr Jane Ruby, [May 29, 2022 ]
We need a class action suit against Pfizer and Moderna for false marketing of their mRNA gene modifying products as vaccines
And against their CEOs directly, for promoting the off label use of their products
WHERE ARE THE PATRIOT ATTORNEYS??? There has to be more than just attorney Tom Renz or Todd Callender!
USCODE-2010-title31-subtitleIII-chap37-subchapIII-sec3729
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.
Correction. Video was edited to sound like …by 2023 we will reduce the world population by 50% instead, here is the original video…
Pfizer CEO: “by 2023 we will reduce the world population by 50%”
Schwab: “You are a purpose driven company”
Who will arrest these two men and set up a citizens court to try them for charges of premeditated mass murder?
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.
Dr. Ariyana Love, ND
Reminder of how tyrannical and downright evil Pfizer’s intentions are.
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use
If this isn’t COVID vaccine clinical fraud, then can someone explain to me what it IS?
https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/if-this-isnt-covid-vaccine-clinical
Source: Dr. Tenpenny
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.
PFIZER’S NEW 80,000-PAGE DATA DUMP IS A NIGHTMARE – AND CAME AT THE SAME TIME AS THE ROE v WADE LEAK – Notable issues include:
︎Pfizer’s COVID vaccine was NOT 95% effective as they claimed. The data shows it has a 12% efficacy rate for the first 7 days…then falls to less than 1% (0.84%)
︎There were no human clinical trials to determine if the experimental COVID vaccines were safe for pregnant women. They were excluded from all the trials. Instead, they tested it on 44 rats before claiming it was “safe”
︎There are a total of 9 sites revealed so far (as of May 2, 2022) of 158. Under 6.6% of the Subjects are accounted for. Where did the data relating to the hundreds of other Subjects/trial participants go?
︎Where are the 25,706 patients missing from the Pfizer data?
︎The lipid nanoparticles were found to have distributed throughout the body — in the liver, ovaries & other vital organs 48 hrs post injection
︎The latest release can be found via the database here or at the ICAN site here.
PFIZER’S NEW 80,000-PAGE DATA DUMP IS A NIGHTMARE – AND CAME AT THE SAME TIME AS THE ROE v WADE LEAK – Notable issues include:
︎Pfizer’s COVID vaccine was NOT 95% effective as they claimed. The data shows it has a 12% efficacy rate for the first 7 days…then falls to less than 1% (0.84%)
︎There were no human clinical trials to determine if the experimental COVID vaccines were safe for pregnant women. They were excluded from all the trials. Instead, they tested it on 44 rats before claiming it was “safe”
︎There are a total of 9 sites revealed so far (as of May 2, 2022) of 158. Under 6.6% of the Subjects are accounted for. Where did the data relating to the hundreds of other Subjects/trial participants go?
︎Where are the 25,706 patients missing from the Pfizer data?
︎The lipid nanoparticles were found to have distributed throughout the body — in the liver, ovaries & other vital organs 48 hrs post injection
︎The latest release can be found via the database here or at the ICAN site here.
Source: COVID-19 Agenda
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.
The basis for Pfizer to declare the COVID vaccine ‘safe and effective’ for pregnant woman was a study with 44 rats in France. Every doctor making that call either worked for Pfizer or held stock in companies profiting from the vaccine. Dr. Naomi Wolf on Americas Voice.
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.
DATA SCIENTIST {EDC DEVELOPER + STATISTICAL EXPERT + DATA MANAGER} 