Tag Archives: Pfizer allergies

THE EYE OF THE PFIZER

THE EYE OF THE PFIZER — (THIS WAS DELETED ON YOUTUBE AND TIKTOK) – XAUDIO REMASTERX


Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

1291 SIDE/ADVERSE EVENTS FROM THE PFIZER VACCINES #MRNA

Dr. Ariyana Love, ND
Reminder of how tyrannical and downright evil Pfizer’s intentions are.

https://neopoprealismjournal.wordpress.com/2022/03/09/pfizer-just-released-the-vaccine-adverse-effects-list-why-not-earlier/

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use

PFIZER’S NEW 80,000-PAGE DATA DUMP IS A NIGHTMARE – AND CAME AT THE SAME TIME AS THE ROE v WADE LEAK

PFIZER’S NEW 80,000-PAGE DATA DUMP IS A NIGHTMARE – AND CAME AT THE SAME TIME AS THE ROE v WADE LEAK – Notable issues include:
▪︎Pfizer’s COVID vaccine was NOT 95% effective as they claimed. The data shows it has a 12% efficacy rate for the first 7 days…then falls to less than 1% (0.84%)
▪︎There were no human clinical trials to determine if the experimental COVID vaccines were safe for pregnant women. They were excluded from all the trials. Instead, they tested it on 44 rats before claiming it was “safe”
▪︎There are a total of 9 sites revealed so far (as of May 2, 2022) of 158. Under 6.6% of the Subjects are accounted for. Where did the data relating to the hundreds of other Subjects/trial participants go?
▪︎Where are the 25,706 patients missing from the Pfizer data?
▪︎The lipid nanoparticles were found to have distributed throughout the body — in the liver, ovaries & other vital organs 48 hrs post injection
▪︎The latest release can be found via the database here or at the ICAN site here.

PFIZER’S NEW 80,000-PAGE DATA DUMP IS A NIGHTMARE – AND CAME AT THE SAME TIME AS THE ROE v WADE LEAK – Notable issues include:

▪︎Pfizer’s COVID vaccine was NOT 95% effective as they claimed. The data shows it has a 12% efficacy rate for the first 7 days…then falls to less than 1% (0.84%)

▪︎There were no human clinical trials to determine if the experimental COVID vaccines were safe for pregnant women. They were excluded from all the trials. Instead, they tested it on 44 rats before claiming it was “safe”

▪︎There are a total of 9 sites revealed so far (as of May 2, 2022) of 158.  Under 6.6% of the Subjects are accounted for. Where did the data relating to the hundreds of other Subjects/trial participants go?

▪︎Where are the 25,706 patients missing from the Pfizer data?

▪︎The lipid nanoparticles were found to have distributed throughout the body — in the liver, ovaries & other vital organs 48 hrs post injection

▪︎The latest release can be found via the database here or at the ICAN site here.

Source: COVID-19 Agenda

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

DR. NAOMI WOLF – PFIZER DOCUMENTS PROVE MASSIVE CRIMES AGAINST PREGNANT WOMEN

The basis for Pfizer to declare the COVID vaccine ‘safe and effective’ for pregnant woman was a study with 44 rats in France. Every doctor making that call either worked for Pfizer or held stock in companies profiting from the vaccine. Dr. Naomi Wolf on Americas Voice.

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

The next batch of Pfizer vaccine documents from the FDA has been produced [May 2022]

Corporations are about to go on a pro choice advertising campaign under the guise of women’s rights, yet they are also destroying women’s sports by letting biological males participate.

Roe v Wade will be overturned.
When that happens liberals will burn every city and town.

Be prepared to use all means to defend yourself.

We might have another summer of riots.

Roe was leaked to take heat off of the Pfizer data dump. The vaccine information is bad, very very bad. Pfizer, CDC and our government all lied. -Angela Pray

May, 2022 New Pfizer Documents Released – Part 1

The next batch of Pfizer vaccine documents from the FDA has been produced (90,702 pages), available at Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency. This month’s release includes 80,000 pages …

Links to the new documents (pages 7 and 8 on PHMPT):

Page 7
• 125742_S1_M5_5351_bnt162 01_20116.pdf
• 125742_S1_M5_5351_bnt162 01_20215.pdf
• 125742_S1_M5_5351_bnt162 01_20242.pdf
• 125742_S1_M5_5351_bnt162 01_10010.pdf
• 125742_S1_M5_5351_bnt162 01_10075.pdf
• 125742_S1_M5_5351_bnt162 01 interim3 excluded patients.pdf
• 125742_S1_M5_5351_bnt162 01 interim3 iec irb.pdf
• 125742_S1_M5_5351_bnt162 01 interim3 investigators.pdf
• 125742_S1_M5_5351_bnt162 01 interim3 invest signature.pdf

Page 8
• 125742_S1_M5_5351_bnt162 01 interim3 adverse events.pdf
• 125742_S1_M5_5351_bnt162 01 interim3 compliance.pdf
• 125742_S1_M5_5351_bnt162 01 interim3 demographics.pdf
• 125742_S1_M5_5351_bnt162 01 interim3 discontinued patients.pdf
• 125742_S1_M5_5351_bnt162 01 interim3 lab measurements.pdf
• 125742_S1_M5_5351_bnt162 01 interim3 sap.pdf
• 125742_S1_M5_5351_bnt162 01 interim3 sponsor personnel list.pdf
• 125742_S1_M5_5351_bnt162 01 interim3 sponsor signature.pdf
• 125742_S1_M5_5351_bnt162 01 interim3 synopsis.pdf
• 125742_S1_M5_5351_bnt162 01 interim3 notes for reader.pdf
• 125742_S1_M5_5351_bnt162 01 interim3 patient batches.pdf
• 125742_S1_M5_5351_bnt162 01 interim3 protocol.pdf
• 125742_S1_M5_5351_bnt162 01 interim3 protocol deviations.pdf
• 125742_S1_M5_5351_bnt162 01 interim3 report body.pdf
• 125742_S1_M5_5351_bnt162 01 interim3 sample crf.pdf
• 125742_S1_M5_5351_c4591001 interim mth6 randomization sensitive.pdf
• 125742_S1_M5_5351_c4591001 interim mth6 sample crf.pdf
• 125742_S1_M5_5351_c4591001 interim mth6 sponsor signature.pdf
• 125742_S1_M5_bnt162 01 S csdrg.pdf
• 125742_S1_M5_c4591001 S acrf.pdf
• 125742_S1_M5_c4591001 S csdrg.pdf
• 125742_S1_M5_c4591001 S Supp acrf.pdf
• 125742_S1_M5_bnt162 01 A adrg.pdf
• 125742_S1_M5_bnt162 01 S acrf.pdf
• 125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001 1003 10031065.pdf

👉 Source: Aaron Siri

May, 2022 New Pfizer Documents Released – Part 2

Links to the next batch of Pfizer vaccine documents released by the FDA, available at Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency (pages 9 and 10):

Page 9
• 125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001 1003 10031111.pdf
• 125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001 1003 10031113.pdf
• 125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001 1003 10031149.pdf
• 125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001 1003 10031186.pdf
• 125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001 1003 10031197.pdf
• 125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001 1003 10031207.pdf
• 125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001 1005 10051047.pdf
• 125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001 1001 10011093.pdf
• 125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001 1001 10011100.pdf
• 125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001 1001 10011135.pdf
• 125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001 1003 10031038.pdf
• 125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001 1005 10051054.pdf
• 125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001 1005 10051069.pdf
• 125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001 1005 10051214.pdf
• 125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001 1005 10051293.pdf
• 125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001 1005 10051347.pdf
• 125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001 1005 10051387.pdf
• 125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001 1005 10051411.pdf
• 125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001 1006 10061020.pdf
• 125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001 1006 10061040.pdf
• 125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001 1006 10061052.pdf
• 125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001 1006 10061094.pdf
• 125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001 1006 10061098.pdf
• 125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001 1006 10061176.pdf
• FDA CBER 2021 5683 0058316 to 0058458_125742_S1_M5_c4591001 A Supp define.xml

Page 10
• FDA CBER 2021 5683 0058459 to 0058478_125742_S1_M5_c4591001 A Supp define 2 0 0.xsl
• FDA CBER 2021 5683 0058479 to 0058594_125742_S1_M5_c4591001 S define.xml
• FDA CBER 2021 5683 0058595 to 0058614_125742_S1_M5_c4591001 S define 2 0 0.xsl
• FDA CBER 2021 5683 0058615 to 0058652_125742_S1_M5_c4591001 S Supp define.xml
• FDA CBER 2021 5683 0058653 to 0058675_125742_S1_M5_c4591001 S Supp define 2 0 0.xsl
• FDA CBER 2021 5683 0058676 to 0058794_125742_S1_M5_bnt162 01 A define.xsl
• FDA CBER 2021 5683 0058795 to 0058828_125742_S1_M5_bnt162 01 A define 2 0 0.xsl
• FDA CBER 2021 5683 0058829 to 0058954_125742_S1_M5_bnt162 01 S define.xml
• FDA CBER 2021 5683 0058955 to 0058999_125742_S1_M5_bnt162 01 S define 2 0 0.xsl
• FDA CBER 2021 5683 0065774 to 0066700_125742_S1_M5_c4591001 A D addv.xpt
• FDA-CBER-2021-5683-0059000 to -0065773_125742_S1_M5_c4591001-A-D-adcevd.xpt
• FDA-CBER-2021-5683-0066701-to-0123167_125742_S1_M5_c4591001-A-D-adfacevd.xpt
• FDA-CBER-2021-5683-0123168-to-0126026_125742_S1_M5_c4591001-A-D-adva.xpt

👉 Source: Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency

The latest batch of Pfizer documents has dropped starting at the bottom of Page 7

https://phmpt.org/pfizers-documents/

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

Conflicts of Interest in Pfizer Vaccine Trial

Oh what a tangled web pharma weaves with its arbiters of vaccine safety. Appointed in secret, meeting in secret, identities kept secret, and all paid by the companies they are supposed to oversee. What could possibly go wrong?!

ICAN’s attorneys have done some more digging since we warned in 2020 that the Data and Safety Monitoring Boards (DSMBs) overseeing vaccine trials were compromised by financial ties to Big Pharma. Now, thanks to the dogged FOIA efforts of ICAN’s attorneys to research documents produced from Pfizer’s biological product file, we see just how deep the corruption goes.

Among the latest cache of documents extracted from the FDA is a 61-page document, entitled Investigational BNT162 Vaccine Program, which describes Pfizer’s internal-review mechanism for the Covid-19 vaccine trials it conducted in 2020 and 2021. Pages 51 and 52 list five original members of Pfizer’s ‘External Data Monitoring Committee’ (EDMC), its own DSMB, with two more members added in February 2021. (Interestingly, these two members are both Maternal Fetal Medicine doctors).

Of the original five members, we knew of one early on because a CBS article revealed in September 2020, apparently by mistake, the inclusion of Kathryn Edwards, MD, a professor at Vanderbilt University. In case you missed our earlier briefing about her, here’s a brief recap: She was a paid advisor to Pfizer directly before joining the DSMB. She has also received payments, speaking fees, or funding from numerous pharmaceutical companies, including Moderna, Merck, and Smith-Kline Beecham, while Sanofi provided her with trips to Paris, Dublin, Amsterdam, and Cancun, among other destinations. Nice work if you can get it!

But surely she would be forthcoming about all such connections, right? Well, in her July 2020 presentation to the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), titled COVID’19 Vaccine Safety Considerations, the conflict conveniently was never disclosed despite the fact that she had been on a COVID-19 DSMB for over 3 months at that point!

Now, we finally have the names of the other DSMB members too. But before we look at them, here’s a reminder of what NIAID director Anthony Fauci, told an interviewer in September 2020. The DSMBs, he said, are “beholden to no one, not to the president, not to the vaccine companies, not to the FDA. Not to me.”

Well, this certainly doesn’t stand up in the case of Kathryn Edwards, but how accurate is Fauci’s pronouncement when it comes to the other members of Pfizer’s DSMB reviewing vaccine trial data? Here’s a thumbnail sketch:

Jonathan Zenilman, MD, of Johns Hopkins University, was the chair of the committee. He received consulting fees from Pfizer in every year from 2014 to 2020 to the tune of $78,279 ($28,168 in 2020 alone). Beyond that, he received $6,045.09 in compensation from being wined and dined, and travelling at Pfizer’s expense between 2014 and 2019. His other Big Pharma patrons over these years include GSK, Merck, Smith & Nephew, Cubist, Siemens Medical Solutions, Cipla, Tetraphase Pharma, The Medicines Company, K2M, Becton, Dickinson and Company, Perrigo, and Theravance. Between 2014 and 2020, Dr. Zenilman received an astonishing $91,257.69 from these pharmaceutical companies (including Pfizer) excluding research funding. In addition, Zenilman has received
NIH funding.
Robert Belshe, MD, founder of the Center for Vaccine Development at Saint Louis University School of Medicine, received various consulting fees and compensation from Pfizer, GSK, Dermira, Sanofi, AstraZeneca, Merck, Emergent Biosolutions, Comsort, Seqirus, Novartis, and Viiv Healthcare during every year from 2014 to 2020, and from AstraZeneca every year from 2014 to 2018. “How much” you ask? An incredible total of $452,794.26, excluding research funding. Pfizer was especially forthcoming with consulting fees, speaking fees, and generous helpings of “Food and Beverage” and “Travel and Lodging,” compensating him $36,225 in 2020 alone. Dr. Belshe disclosed his own conflicts in a 2019 article: Belshe has been a consultant and/or speaker for GSK, Medimmune, Sanofi, Flugen, Novavax, Merck, and Moderna; owns stock/stock options in Flugen; is a scientific board member for Flugen; and has served on data safety monitoring board for GSK, MedImmune, Vical, and Vaxart.
Lawrence Stanberry, MD, of Columbia University, received more than $23,000 from Pfizer in 2020, as well as research funding from the NIH, CDC, and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.   He reports consulting fees from Janssen, GSK, and Novartis and is a member of the scientific advisory board of Abivax. Nothing to see here!
Robert Philips Heine, MD, of Wake Forest Baptist Health in Winston-Salem, NC, received $27,450.28 in payments from pharmaceutical companies between 2014 and 2020 for travel and lodging, food and beverage, and consulting fees. Pfizer provided the bulk of these payments with $4,812.50 for consulting fees in 2020 alone. Heine has been a consultant and speaker for GSK and Merck and has received research funding from GSK. His work has been funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
Heather S. Lipkind, MS, MS, of Yale School of Medicine, accepted consulting fees and research funding from Pfizer during 2019 and 2020, for a total of $21,660.

Steve Self, PhD, a statistician at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, is also a board member of Health Stream Analytics, an organization developing “novel easy-to-use biometric sensors.”

We’ve said it before, but now we’re saying it again, and louder: the individuals involved with overseeing and green-lighting Covid-19 injections are a cozy club of insiders whose pockets are now further richly lined with Big Pharma spoils.

To share this legal update, please use this link: https://www.icandecide.org/ican_press/conflicts-of-interest-in-pfizer-vaccine-

Source: https://www.icandecide.org/

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

Pfizer hid this shocking data . ..

Reposted by permission from Liberty Counsel Action.

Bombshells continue to roll in. Pfizer documents reveal it hired or planned to hire 2,400 full-time employees just to process the “large number of adverse events” in people who got Pfizer’s COVID shots.

As early as February 28, 2021, Pfizer knew the incredible damage its shot was inflicting on Americans. Even worse, the FDA also knew and tried to hide these and many other facts from you.

Instead of telling the truth, our government spent 1 billion of your tax dollars to brainwash people to get this injection … and then forced this shot onto millions more. People facing these abusive mandates continue to flood my team with pleas for help. Right now, more than 30 states have locations with ongoing “Testing and Vaccine Passport” requirements.

Demand that state and federal leaders block Vaccine Passports and digital control of free Americans. — Mat

Ana,

More than a year ago, Pfizer knew its injection led to an unprecedented number of adverse events and deaths, yet neither the drug company nor the FDA disclosed this critical information to the public—until forced to do so by court order.

The unredacted version from Pfizer states:

“Pfizer has also taken a multiple actions [sic] to help alleviate the large increase of adverse event reports. This includes significant technology enhancements, and process and workflow solutions, as well as increasing the number of data entry and case processing colleagues. To date, Pfizer has onboarded approximately 600 additional full-time employees (FTEs). More are joining each month with an expected total of more than 1,800 additional resources by the end of June 2021.”

What Pfizer should have willingly offered to the public required a FOIA lawsuit to pry the truth out of our government!

But now that you know what our government knew. It is even more shocking that our politicians conspired to force our military members, federal employees, private government contractors, doctors, nurses, travelers, private businesses, schools and so many more to demand these injections. And if that wasn’t enough, now they are rolling out Vaccine Passports.

Make your voice heard before it is too late by sending faxes to state and national leaders to stop Vaccine Passports.

Our government not only hid this information, but then Congress appropriated 1 billion dollars last year to “strengthen vaccine confidence in the United States.”

Using your tax dollars, hundreds of news organizations were paid to promote the shots. The strategy included “trusted messengers and influencers” speaking to news organizations to “provide factual, timely information and steps people can take” to get the shot. When most businesses were crumbling and slashing their ad budget, the federal government stepped up with a fat wad supporting a “national initiative to increase public confidence in and uptake of COVID-19 vaccines.”

This ad buyout happened at media networks, including ABC, CBS, NBC, Fox News, CNN, Newsmax, MSNBC, New York PostLos Angeles TimesWashington Post, BuzzFeed News and hundreds of local newspapers and TV stations. These news sources were sold out. These media outlets were collectively responsible for publishing countless articles and video segments promoting the COVID shots as “safe and effective.”

But the government already knew better. At least 26,396 reported deaths have been associated with these shots, plus an additional 4,423 miscarriages. Almost 49,000 people have been permanently disabled. And more than 1.2 million people have had adverse reactions.

Pharmaceutical companies, government and news media lied to push Americans to get these shots. And since that wasn’t enough, the government is now preparing to force these shots through Vaccine Passports!

We must not give up our freedom so easily. The push for a digital health passport is much bigger than COVID. This agenda was in place long before COVID. Urge your state and federal leaders to stop digital credentials, Vaccine Passports and freedom-killing mandates.

Nations are falling all over themselves to institute this new push for digital health passports worldwide—and people are lining up to join. The European Union (EU) already launched its Vaccine Passport.

Recently, the EU bragged: “As of April 2022, more than 1.7 billion certificates have been issued by member states,” calling the extent of these passports “a momentous milestone.” These Vaccine Passports are accepted in 29 countries and territories, such as United Arab Emirates, Thailand, Malaysia and Uruguay.

In total, this brings the number to more than 3.2 billion people under the control of these Vaccine Passports. It’s not just happening in Europe, Africa, Australia, India and the EU … it is growing in America too.

Already, a program called “My Bindle” says it has locations in 30 states across America that demand testing and Vaccine Passports. It shares “your COVID-19 test and vaccine records and easily prove[s] your health status.”

This is getting out of hand. It is time to stop these Vaccine Passports! Rush urgent faxes to state and federal leaders to demand they roll back these attacks on freedom.

Some people are calling our office sobbing. We are working late nights and weekends to help as many as we can. We were the first organization fighting Vaccine Passports, and we will keep fighting as long as God grants us the resources.

I ask you to pray about giving your best gift to strengthen our voice against tyranny and help our mission by signing up for recurring monthly donations to help end this now.

Mat Staver, Chairman
Liberty Counsel Action

P.S. Join our extended Challenge Grant that will effectively DOUBLE the impact of your donationsSelect here to equip our staff to fight this battle for freedom.

Then send faxes to key leaders demanding they stop this government-forced agenda. Sign our petition to these leaders to be delivered at critical moments in this fight against mandatory vaccines.

Sources:

“About My Bindle.” Bindle, April 26, 2021. Joinbindle.com/learnmore/.

“Digital Documentation of COVID-19 Certificates: Test Result: Technical Specifications and Implementation Guidance, World Health Organization. March 31, 2022. Who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-2019-nCoV-Digital_certificates_diagnostic_test_results-2022.1.

“EU Digital COVID Certificate, the Vaccine Passport for Europe.” COVID Pass Certificate. Updated: April 6, 2022. Covidpasscertificate.com/europe-digital-green-pass/.

Kelleher, Suzanne Rowan. “Digital Vaccine Passes Will Soon Be in More than 30 States — Here’s How That Will Make Travel a Lot Easier.” Forbes, December 6, 2021. Forbes.com/sites/suzannerowankelleher/2021/12/06/digital-vaccine-passes-united-states.

Liberty Counsel. “Pfizer Tried to Hide the Hiring of 2,400 Employees to Handle Adverse Events.” Press Release. April 6, 2022. Lc.org/newsroom/details/pfizer-tried-to-hide-the-hiring-of-2400-employees-to-handle-adverse-events.

National Health Authority. 2022. “Official Website Ayushman Bharat Digital Mission.” Ministry of Health and Family Welfare: Government of India. Accessed April 1, 2022. Abdm.gov.in.

Sharma, Neetu Chandra. “COVID-19 Health Data to Be Documented via Electronic Certificate Globally.” Business Today. Updated: April 1, 2022. Businesstoday.in/latest/story/covid-19-health-data-to-be-documented-via-electronic-certificate-globally-328318-2022-04-01.

“WHO Launches Guidance on Digitally Documenting SARS-CoV-2 Test Results.” World Health Organization. March 31, 2022. Who.int/news/item/31-03-2022-who-launches-guidance-on-digitally-documenting-sars-cov-2-test-results.‌

Liberty Counsel Action is a 501(c)(4) tax-exempt non-profit organization. Donations are not tax deductible.

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

The next batch of Pfizer vaccine documents from the FDA has been produced [April 2022]

The next batch of Pfizer vaccine documents from the FDA has been produced (11,043 pages), as well as an unredacted version of the post-marketing experience report

(See page 7): http://phmpt.org/pfizers-documents/

Source: phmpt.org/pfizers-documents/

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

Pfizer Adds 600 Full-Time Employees to Handle Volume of Reported Adverse Events

The attorneys that represent ICAN are representing the plaintiff in a lawsuit against the FDA to obtain Pfizer’s covid vaccine documents. They recently secured an unredacted copy of a previously produced post-authorization adverse event report. The lifted redactions reveal that within weeks of Pfizer’s vaccine being administered pursuant to emergency use authorization, Pfizer, apparently unexpectedly, had to hire 600 full time employees “to help alleviate the large increase of adverse event reports” being received by the company.

You can find initial redacted copy of the report here and the unredacted copy here with the redactions lifted on page 6.
The lifted redactions also reveal the number of doses that had been shipped as of the date of the report (just over 126 million doses), offering at least some denominator to assist in understanding the volume of reports following vaccination. Notably, this is the number of doses shipped and the report does not disclose the number of doses administered by the date of the report.

ICAN will continue to review the incoming documents as they are made public and will continue to share them with our supporters.

To share this legal update, please use this link: https://www.icandecide.org/ican_press/pfizer-adds-600-full-time-employees-to-handle-volume-of-reported-adverse-events/

Source: Icandecide.org

*******666************

Bombshell: Pfizer Saw So Many Adverse Events, They Had to Hire 2,400 NEW Employees to Process Them
Dr. Naomi Wolf: “[Pfizer] hid, they concealed, they redacted from disclosure, forced by court, the fact that they were processing so many adverse events in the first three months… that they had to hire 2,400 new employees. They hid that; they concealed it… the volume of bad outcomes, dangerous outcomes… there were so many [that] they couldn’t keep up with it with their own staff.”
Latest FOI of Pfizer records show that 3 months after vaccine rollout they hired 600 full time employees just to process the adverse event reports of vaccine side effects, with a plan to hire another 1200 by June 2021.

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

ICAN-Obtained Study Shows Adverse Events Increase When Chickenpox and MMR Vaccines are Given at the Same Time

FDA and Merck have known about these harms for 25 years and yet failed to warn pediatricians or parents
Background and context
When Merck’s M-M-R II was licensed in 1978, a proper clinical trial of its safety was never conducted. From a prior ICAN demand to the FDA, we know that the safety was only assessed in 834 children for a period of 42 days in trials that had no placebo control. Further, within the first 42 days following administration of the vaccine, in one of the largest trials for this vaccine, 63% of the children experienced gastrointestinal illness and 42% had upper respiratory illness. Yet the FDA approved the product anyway.
Ignoring troubling safety signals appears to be a pattern with the FDA. Fast forward to 1995 – following licensure of another Merck vaccine, VARIVAX (attenuated, live, varicella, a.k.a. chickenpox, vaccine), the FDA required a post-licensure safety study which Merck conducted from June 1, 1995 through February 5, 1997.  In 2019, ICAN, though its attorneys, filed a Freedom of Information Act request for that post-licensure study, which the FDA finally produced a few months ago.
The discovery of the VARIVAX post-licensure study
Merck’s Phase-IV post-licensure study included 34,655 children 12-23 months old and 51,463 children 2 to 12 years of age who were injected with VARIVAX. About 60% of these children aged 12-23 months and 17% of these children aged 2 to 12 years also received the improperly tested M-M-R II vaccine, in addition to other vaccines, at the same time they received VARIVAX. The study found several troubling safety signals.
The study found more than 60 conditions including allergic reactions, alopecia, arthritis/arthralgia, and gastroenteritis that were significantly elevated following VARIVAX vaccination. This suggests this vaccine, soon after administration, may lead to a wide range of reactions that in many cases are worse than the usual chickenpox rash.
But then there was this additional bombshell that, as far as we know, has never been disclosed to the public. The post-licensure study shows that there are significantly more adverse events among children receiving both VARIVAX and M-M-R II compared to those receiving VARIVAX alone (summary table below).

Every parent should be horrified by this information. To be clear: what is notable here is that the FDA knew, as early as the first report of this study in September 1997, that the likelihood of an adverse event in children 12-23 months old and 2-12 years old appears significantly increased if the child receives VARIVAX at the same time as the M-M-R II vaccine.
The study also noted: “It should be born in mind that concomitant vaccination with MMR could be a marker for vaccination with several other vaccines simultaneously.” (p. 19).
This raises multiple red flags. The FDA and Merck know that VARIVAX is linked with increased rates of troubling adverse events. And the FDA and Merck know that the CDC schedule increases the rate of harms given that it calls for concomitant administration of VARIVAX and MMR (and potentially “several other vaccines”)!
So, what did the FDA do about it? Did it reevaluate the licensure of VARIVAX? No. Did it reevaluate the licensure of MMR, M-M-R II, or MMRV? No. Did it, at the very least, immediately recommend that VARIVAX and M-M-R II no longer be given concomitantly? No. And it still has not done so, 25 years later.
The FDA had a legal and moral obligation to release this information to the public so that parents could make informed decisions. Of course, as we have seen repeatedly, the FDA is loath to admit it has made a mistake. So, this report was essentially buried for 25 years until ICAN finally took action to obtain a copy.
More than two decades later, the FDA has not even bothered to update the package inserts for M-M-R II to disclose these harms!
In fact, despite the results of this study, the package insert for VARIVAX today explicitly claims that administering the two together is perfectly safe: “VARIVAX may be administered concomitantly with M-M-R II.”
This is yet another example of deception on the American people and why federal health authorities should have no role in recommending, let alone mandating, any product, but especially any product that can have adverse effects. Once federal health authorities become partners in the success of a vaccine product, including having their reputations tied to its success and being the party responsible for defending against claims it causes harm, admitting issues or mistakes becomes a devastating proposition to the very same health authorities that are supposed to ensure vaccine safety. This conflict is intractable and destructive.
ICAN will never stop fighting to bring you the truth and making sure that every last government official that has failed to safeguard the health of our children is held accountable.

To share this legal update, please use this link: https://www.icandecide.org/ican_press/ican-obtained-study-shows-adverse-events-increase-when-chickenpox-and-mmr-vaccines-are-given-at-the-same-time/

 

Source: https://www.icandecide.org/

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.