Tag Archives: NIAID

#FireDrFauci: List of Mistakes and Lies

1-Fauci says he warned Trump in January that the US was in real trouble but that is not what he said publicly.

TRENDING: Fauci Tells Sharpton He Warned Trump Admin in Mid to Late January “We Were in Real Trouble” from Coronavirus

In January Dr. Anthony Fauci told Newsmax TV that the United States “did not have to worry” about the coronavirus and that it was “not a major threat.

2) warned of an apocalyptic coronavirus pandemic — then just weeks later he later compared the coronavirus to a bad flu.

3.) Dr. Fauci based all of his predictions on garbage IHME models that were OFF BY MILLIONS and then told reporters this past week, “You can’t really rely on models.”

“It is hard to imagine a more stupid or more dangerous way of making decisions than by putting those decisions in the hands of people who pay no price for being wrong.”

― Thomas Sowell

4.) On March 20th Dr. Fauci jumped in and “corrected” the president during a press briefing on hydroxychloroquine treatment for coronavirus saying, “You got to be careful when you say ‘fairly effective.’ It was never done in a clinical trial… It was given to individuals and felt that maybe it worked.”

pushed these garbage models every step of the way.

5) Three weeks ago Dr. Fauci claimed 1 million to 2 million Americans would die from coronavirus. Then he said 100,000 to 200,000 Americans will die from the virus. Then last week he agreed 81,766 Americans would die from the coronavirus. Then by Wednesday, the experts cut the number of deaths to 60,415 projected deaths.

6.)  On Sunday Dr. Fauci said President Trump should have shut down the economy in February.

The president was a bit pre-occupied in February with the Democrat impeachment sham.

That’s not what Dr. Fauci said ON FEBRUARY 29th

But in late February  Fauci told the TODAY Show on February 29 that you don’t need to “change anything you’re doing.”:


Challenging Anthony Fauci

“I don’t think you are the one person who gets to make a decision.  We can listen to your advice but there are people on the other side saying there’s not going to be a surge and we can safely open the economy.”

The speaker was Sen. Rand Paul, in the hearing with the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions on Tuesday.  Sen. Paul, a medical doctor, was addressing Dr. Anthony Fauci of the president’s coronavirus task force.  Dr. Fauci did not appreciate the challenge.

“I’m a scientist, a physician and a public health official,” Fauci said.  The millions of Americans struggling to get their lives back might quibble with the order, and a key part of the description is missing.

Anthony Fauci earned a medical degree from Cornell University in 1966.  He does not list advanced degrees in molecular biology so, strictly speaking, Anthony Fauci is not a virologist.

In 1984, a full 36 years ago, Fauci hired on with the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID).

There Fauci made a name for himself with the claim that AIDS would ravage the heterosexual community.  That turned out to be wrong; for background, see The Myth of Heterosexual AIDS by Michael Fumento and Inventing the AIDS Virus by Peter Duesberg, who is a molecular biologist.

On Fauci’s watch, NIAID became a major funder of research for what is now known as HIV/AIDS.  Dr. Fauci could often be found testifying before Congress, which is where the money comes from.  Lately, his ability to get things wrong has been on full display.

In January of 2020, Dr. Fauci said it was unclear whether the coronavirus could spread person to person and cited a very low risk to the United States.  Fauci said people need not wear masks and then contended they should.  No more shaking hands, but according to Fauci, it’s okay to have sex with strangers you meet online.

In press conferences, Fauci avoided the most important fact about COVID-19 — the true mortality rate.  Instead, Fauci showed fondness for various “models” of how the virus might spread.  In early April, Fauci said the coronavirus might become “seasonal” with a resurgence later in the year.  On Tuesday, the good doctor held to that line.

“If some areas — cities states or what have you — jump over those barriers, checkpoints and prematurely open up without having the capability of being able to respond effectively and efficiently,” Fauci testified, “my concern is that we will start to see little spikes that might turn into outbreaks.”

So maybe the kids would not be returning to school in fall, and their embattled parents not returning to work.  That brought on the pushback from Rand Paul, who cited varying mortality figures and rejected a singular approach for the entire country.

In his response, Dr. Fauci said it was not his business to address economic concerns.  That comes something as a surprise to the millions now unemployed due to the lockdown approach Fauci advances.

Prophecy and fear-mongering are not science, so Dr. Fauci’s claim to be first and foremost a scientist needs some qualification.  Fauci, 79, is indeed a public health official, but also a politician of sorts.

Dr. Anthony Fauci has held forth at NIAID for 36 years, making decisions that affect millions of people, without once having to face the vote of the people.  If the people thought he should have been shown the door years ago, it would be hard to blame them.

Lloyd Billingsley is a policy fellow at the Independent Institute.


Deep State Doctor Fauci: Here’s A List Of Mistakes and Lies

Read more: https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2020/05/challenging_anthony_fauci.html#ixzz6UNqRdWng
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook

Fair Use Notice: Images/logos/graphics on this page contains some copyrighted material whose use has not been authorized by the copyright owners. We believe that this not-for-profit, educational, and/or criticism or commentary use on the Web constitutes a fair use of the copyrighted material (as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law).


The Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN) is dedicated to ensuring the public is informed about consumer safety issues. As part of this, ICAN dug deep into NIAID’s recent trial of the drug, Remdesivir and found deviations in study protocol, study size, and inclusion and exclusion criteria. ICAN has sent a letter to NIAID Director, Dr. Tony Fauci, who has claimed that this drug will be “the standard of care’ for COVID-19,” demanding answers to the serious irregularities within the study.

Just what we do here at the informed consent Action Network?
That’S our parent company, that’s the nonprofit!
That makes the highwire possible.
We not only report on the news.
We are making news.
We have won lawsuits against the FDA, CDC National Institute of Health and Health and Human Services, and I want to bring your attention really quickly if you want to know what we do.
This is a brand new letter that we’ve drafted up and sent out.
We are starting an investigation into who Anthony pouchy.
This letter is specifically about REM, desi beer.
If you watched our show a couple of weeks ago, we have serious questions about the manipulation.
The old only study now remember what Dolores was saying.
Hydroxychloroquine is showing success all around the world it works.
Yet Tony pouchy has come out against hydroxychloroquine.
It’S not being used appropriately upon diagnosis in hospitals in New York, where elderly are dying, and I think that that’s a real problem instead he’s come out.
He’S excited about REM, desi beer, which is the exact flip of the coin, the opposite side of the coin.
When I’m desert beer is failing in studies, all around studies been dropped out.
We talked about this two weeks ago, if you’re gonna watch that show but they’re dropping out of trials, because people are dying at higher rates that are taking REM, deser, be while we’re beginning an investigation.
This letter is going out to Tony pouchy.
Let me read some of the excerpts right now.
Can we bring that up?
This is dear doctor, foul to the informed consent Action Network is reporting to you on April 29 2020.
You stated that the data shows that REM dezer beer has a clear-cut, significant positive effect in diminishing the time to recovery.
This study appears to have many serious irregularities as detailed below prior to sending these concerns to the appropriate federal ethics and oversight committees.
We wanted to provide you an opportunity to respond.
The study at issue a multicenter randomized clinical trial, commenced on February 24th.
Like all such studies before it commenced, a detailed study protocol was established.
It is critical that the protocol be set in stone before a study begins.
This assures the validity of the study.
Despite the importance of adhering the study protocol, there were numerous substantive deviations in Nyad study of REM, desi beer, the one you yourself for doing all the failed studies you’re about to override it.
With one study that you were doing, we go through all of the issues: they changed the amount of people in the study they went on and you know, despite the study protocol, they started changing categories.
They even removed death as one of the categories so that we know how many people died.
All of this, while they’re in the middle of the study, you’re changing it while you’re seeing results come in this by almost every definition in science is scientific fraud.
Therefore, we end this letter this way and you can read it.
This is up on our website.
I will not speculate as to your motives and seeking to have REM.
Does it be a license and pushed out to the public so quickly?
What I will say is that you and I ad can do better.
The American people deserve better.
They deserve science, that is on solid footing, not a sales pitch based on a single study in which every material element of its protocol was changed after patient outcomes were observed.
Please provide a response on or before May 22 2022 the serious irregularities regarding the Nyad REM, dezer beer studied detailed above.
If we do not receive a response by then we intend to pursue ethics and related claim with the appropriate federal agencies.
Very truly yours, Dell, big tree CEO of the informed consent Action Network.
You can mark your words.
We are not just started, stop being a letter.
I hope that doctor foul she decides to respond to us and explain what’s going on with this group II study, I also want to let you know that we have 34 requests.
Freedom of Information Act, request for materials from Falchi people at HHS, CDC the NIH.
We are under a full-tilt shock-and-awe investigation of our government, and this ridiculous thing that’s been going on with coab in nineteen.
If you want to support these efforts along with this amazing show where we’re bringing in the best scientists around the world, I really need your help.
These lawsuits are going to cost a lot having this legal team put forward these letters and do these FOIA requests.
It is non-stop.
Please donate 20 for 2020 right now.
You can make a difference.
You can stop this, not only me putting up a tweet.
Stop and cheer at County for taking your kids away.
Imagine what we can do if we can stop Tony pouchy from manipulating studies to push through bad drugs to erase good drugs or make us wait on vaccines while they destroy our economy, the highwire is directly active.
Maybe I’m not a news reporter, maybe on activists I’m called all sorts of different things in newspapers all over the world.
All I can say is I work for you.
We are here for you.
We are fighting for the issues that matter and we are discussing the issues that matter and we were reporting on everything we find and if we find a problem, we don’t just report on it, we investigate it, we send letters and ultimately, we bring lawsuits.
You are making that possible if you want to try and imagine who else is doing exactly that.
I’D like to know and I would also celebrate them too, but we are here for this is sponsored by the informed consent action Network.
You are a part of that network, you were making it happen, and all of this is to make sure that this entire planet does not turn into a circus that our country and government is not some circus game.
But it’s run by intelligent people that actually care about us.
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. The content in my videos and on the WORDPRESS – WORDPRESS channel are provided for informational purposes only. Use the information found in these videos as a starting point for conducting your own research and conduct your own due diligence BEFORE making any significant investing decisions. WORDPRESS assumes all information to be truthful and reliable; however, I cannot and do not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of this information. Thank you!

Benefits of Early Antiretroviral Therapy in HIV Infection

AIDS is caused by HIV, a retrovirus that attacks the immune system. The virus destroys CD4+ T cells, a type of white blood cell that’s vital to fighting off infection. The number of these cells, known as a CD4+ count, is a key measure of immune system health. After people get infected with HIV, their immune system becomes progressively weaker from the HIV infection, their CD4+ count drops, and eventually they develop AIDS.

AIDS is treated with antiretroviral drugs. These drugs suppress HIV but don’t completely eliminate the virus from the body. Guidelines for when to start treatment differ around the world because the evidence for using antiretroviral drugs when CD4+ counts are higher wasn’t definitive. Some experts felt it prudent to wait until the disease progressed to CD4+ levels at which there was a proven benefit.

The START (Strategic Timing of AntiRetroviral Treatment) study is a randomized, controlled clinical trial designed to more clearly define the optimal time for people with HIV to begin antiretroviral therapy. The study was funded in part by NIH’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) and other NIH components.

Researchers in 215 clinics across 35 countries enrolled 4,685 HIV-positive men and women ages 18 and older. All participants had CD4+ counts in the normal range (above 500 cells/mm3) at the time of enrollment and had never taken antiretroviral therapy. They were randomly assigned to 2 groups. The early-treatment group began taking antiretrovirals immediately. The deferral group delayed treatment until their CD4+ counts dropped to 350 cells/mm3 or until they developed AIDS or another condition that required antiretroviral treatment.

The team tracked combinations of outcomes: serious AIDS events (such as AIDS-related cancers or death from AIDS) and serious non-AIDS events (such as cardiovascular disease, end-stage renal disease, liver disease, and non-AIDS-related death).

In May 2015, an independent panel reviewed interim results. They found that the benefits of early antiretroviral therapy far outweighed any risks. The findings were disseminated to study participants, and treatment was offered to everyone in the deferred group.

The research team reported additional findings online on July 20, 2015, in the New England Journal of Medicine. The scientists determined that the overall risk of developing serious AIDS-related events, serious non-AIDS events, or death was reduced by 57% among those in the early-treatment group compared to those in the deferred group. This reduction was seen regardless of age, sex, baseline CD4+ counts, geographic region, or country income level.

Early antiretroviral treatment lowered the risk of serious AIDS-related events by 72%. Early treatment also lessened the risk of serious non-AIDS events by 39%.

A limitation of the study, the researchers note, is that the participants were fairly young, with a median age of 36 years. In addition, they were only followed for 3 years, which is fairly short given that antiretroviral therapy is typically prescribed for a lifetime.

“This study conclusively shows that the benefits of early therapy far outweigh any adverse outcomes, and reinforces recommendations to offer immediate antiretroviral therapy to all HIV patients,” says NIAID Director Dr. Anthony S. Fauci.

Source: FDA.Gov