Tag Archives: Informed Consent

We’re Heading to the Supreme Court

 

WE’RE GOING BACK TO THE US SUPREME COURT!

Late last year the Institute for Health Research and the Natural Solutions Foundation submitted Amicus Briefs in support of the Control Group Case.  That Case is now being presented to the United States Supreme Court and we are once again submitting a supporting brief to vindicate the universal right of Informed Consent. This case has the potential to stop mandate madness, but only if we support it vigorously!

Support our efforts and cover our legal fees here:
https://fundly.com/support-natural-therapies

The Control Group SCOTUS Petition

Here are excerpts from the Petition:

Without a control group to establish a cause-and effect relationship, ‘science’ is not science; it is guesswork. True science requires control groups. Since the start of the National Vaccine Program (enforced by POTUS since 1962), chronic disorders have ballooned in vaccinated people only, while remaining relatively stable in the never-vaccinated population. Logically, the government should study a control group of never-vaccinated people (Petitioners) or at least not destroy their group. Instead, POTUS has directed and managed his subordinates to vaccinate every American, including the control group — the estimated 0.26% threatened group of healthy, never-vaccinated people. Regardless of intentions, and regardless of vaccine safety claims,
the President is destroying evidence. He is destroying control groups’ Fifth Amendment right to exist.

The government admits its mandatory vaccines remain unstudied with a never-vaccinated control group, such as Petitioners’ group (“Control Group”).

Petitioners’ Control Group is necessary to prove any causation of harm. Government data confirm more than one-half of vaccinated Americans suffer lifelong debilitating chronic disorders (i.e., heart disease, diabetes, autoimmune disorders). Yet, these disorders affect less than 6% of the never-vaccinated, according to evidence the Control Group introduced in the District Court. Petitioners allege this simple observation proves the President’s mandatory vaccines harm most people. Conversely, for POTUS to continue claiming his vaccines are safe and effective still requires a genuine control group. Either way, the Judiciary is needed to preserve the evidence.

Source: Dr. Rima Open Source Truth

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

They’re using Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) Orders to turn Hospitals into Death Camps

Dr. Tenpenny, [Mar 30, 2022]
https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/03/25/theyre-using-d-n-r-to-turn-hospitals-into-death-camps/

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

A list of 1000 studies with Evidence COVID-19 Vaccines and Adverse Events

PDF to follow for your convenience

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/02/list-1000-different-studies-show-extensive-evidence-covid-19-vaccines-adverse-events/

source: https://www.informedchoiceaustralia.com/post/1000-peer-reviewed-studies-questioning-covid-19-vaccine-safety

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

ICAN Demands CDC Authors Withdraw Rigged Natural Immunity Study

On October 29, 2021, 53 authors put their name on a paper that they should be, at best, deeply ashamed of and, at worst, held liable for. Seventeen of those authors were members of CDC’s COVID-19 Response Team. ICAN sent them a letter detailing the gross scientific misconduct evidenced in the paper and demanded that they withdraw their names from the study.

The non-peer-reviewed paper titled Laboratory-Confirmed COVID-19 Among Adults Hospitalized with COVID-19–Like Illness with Infection-Induced or mRNA Vaccine-Induced SARS-CoV-2 Immunity — Nine States, January–September 2021 purports to compare the risk of infection between those who previously tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 and those who received a COVID-19 vaccine.

It misleadingly concludes that the unvaccinated have more than a 5x greater risk of becoming infected with COVID-19 than those who are vaccinated. If this strikes you as absurd based on the dozens and dozens of peer-reviewed studies that show the opposite result, and based on everything we know about natural immunity, that is because it is.

There are multiple layers of issues with the way this rigged study was conducted. First, it makes an irrelevant and meaningless comparison. This study does not answer the question of whether vaccination or previous infection is better at decreasing the risk of subsequent COVID-19 disease. Had it studied this question, it would likely show what over 50 other studies have shown: previous infection is more durable, robust, and effective.

Instead, it compares, on the one hand, the percentage of previously positive patients admitted with COVID-like illnesses (CLI) that test positive, with, on the other hand, the percentage of previously vaccinated patients admitted with CLI that test positive. This is meaningless. Under this approach, if there are 100,000 vaccinated individuals admitted with CLI and 10% of them test positive but there are only 10 previously infected individuals admitted with CLI and 100% of them test positive, this study design would find that the previously infected individuals are 10 times (100%/10%) more likely to test positive for the virus. Nonsense.

Further, what should have been the most eye-opening data revealed by the study was seemingly ignored by the authors and by the CDC! The data showed that between June and September 2021, when the percentage of Americans who had previously been infected was just about equal to the percentage who had been fully vaccinated (and not previously infected), but yet the vaccinated had 5,213 cases of CLI and 306 positive cases while the previously infected had only 189 cases of CLI and 89 positive cases.

This finding should have been jaw dropping and raised questions within the CDC such as “why, when the number of people in each group should be the same, are we seeing so many more COVID-like illnesses and COVID-19 infections in those vaccinated than in those who have natural immunity?” But this study was not about asking these questions or getting to the truth.

ICAN made clear to the CDC authors that it knows what they already know: The study was designed to support the irrational, illogical, authoritarian, and punitive policies of the CDC to apply limitations to those previously infected that do not apply to those vaccinated. This is not science. This is misconduct. The burden is now on these scientists to either do the right thing and withdraw from the paper or to double down and deal with the legal consequences of doing so.

To share this legal update, please use this link: https://www.icandecide.org/ican_press/ican-demands-cdc-authors-withdraw-rigged-natural-immunity-study/

Source: icandecide.org

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

The jabs have nothing to do with health.

***UPDATED 31DEC2021*** JEWTUBE censorship removed the video. The updated video from Bitchute is below. THEY CANNOT SILENCE US…

Melissa Ciummei, a financial investor from Northern Ireland, has serious concerns that injection passports will be used more like data passports to control participation in society.

The jabs have nothing to do with health. The vaxx passports have nothing to do with safety. The video below is incredibly important. It makes everything that is going on globally completely comprehensible in an impressively straightforward, logical and sobering discussion.

Do you know who Melissa Ciummei is? I didn’t either until I watched this superbly important, and superbly clear video.

The complete illogic of the conflicting lies we are being fed is untangled and the actual logic of the intentional madness is laid out clearly.

And it is clear that the best way to enslave yourself is to comply with the plan.

So I would like to give you an assignment and ask you to accept it very immediately:

1. Watch the entire video

2. Share it as widely as you can on every type of communication system you have access to

3. Return to Step 2

4. Rinse and repeat

5. Make a generous year end donation to Natural Solutions Foundation so we can continue doing what we do best: support Informed Consent and shine the light of truth on what we are facing.
Use this link to make a PayPal donation, https://paypal.me/natsolutionshealth, or this one to donate through Fundly, https://fundly.com/support-natural-therapies.

Prefer checks? Great! Send your donation to

Natural Solutions Foundation
3769 E Calle Fernando
Tucson AZ 85716.

Yours in health and freedom,

Dr. Rima

Source: Dr. Rima www.OpenSourceTruth.com

America’s Frontline Doctors, [Dec 31, 2021 ]
JUST THIS WEEK:

Biden: There is no “federal solution” to beat COVID-19

CDC Director: “PCR tests are unreliable”

Fauci: “Quarantines can be cut to only 5 days”

CNN: “Cloth masks are not effective”

They are shifting the narrative after being proven wrong time and time again.

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

FOLLOWING ORDERS IS NOT AN EXCUSE: CVS PHARMACIST ADMITS

CVS PHARMACIST ADMITS HE SHOULD NOT BE GIVING THE VAX OF THE BEAST, BUT HE IS JUST FOLLOWING ORDERS!

How many like him are just following orders?

 

Let’s the nuremberg 2.0 begins!

They’re telling you exactly what they’re doing… In plain sight.

If this doesn’t convince your friends and relatives who are all in on the jab…

Nothing will. – Dr. Jane Ruby

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.;

Are you willing to face the facts?

Are you willing to face the facts? mRNA vaccines cause cancer and autoimmune diseases!
There are solid evidence hidden from the public that mRNA vaccines cause those ailments.

I would like to emphasise that mRNA trials in mammals have led to odd cancers.
mRNA trials on mammals have led to autoimmune diseases — not right away, six, nine, 12 months later.
Scientific evidence to follow very soon here!

Share this account and my statements loud and clear as this is only the ugly truth everyone shall be aware of!

This must STOP.
📢 Spread the word!

IT IS FACTUALLY ILLEGAL UNDER BOTH US FEDERAL LAW AND THE NUREMBERG CODE, TO COERCE ANYONE TO TAKE AN EXPERIMENTAL DRUG, VACCINATION, INJECTION OF ANY CONCOCTION OF mRNA.

https://www.ecfr.gov/on/2018-07-19/title-45/subtitle-A/subchapter-A/part-46
CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS
PART 46. PROTECTION OF HUMAN SUBJECTS
Look at § 46.116 General requirements for informed consent. Scroll down to ➡️(b) Basic elements of informed consent.

Things you don’t need in your life:
– So called vaccines
-Social credit score
-Green pass/Vax passports
-Quarantine camps
-To have your life run by ‘experts’ and ‘officials’

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

Congressman Introduces Bill to Force FDA to Release Pfizer Documents Within 100 Days, Instead of 55 Years | CHD

World Doctors Alliance, [Dec 5, 2021 ]
Congressman Introduces Bill to Force FDA to Release Pfizer Documents Within 100 Days, Instead of 55 Years | CHD

U.S. Rep. Ralph Norman (R-SC) on Thursday introduced legislation that would require the FDA to release, within 100 days, all records of information submitted to the agency regarding the Emergency Use Authorization of, or licensing of all Pfizer COVID-19 vaccines.

The legislation stems from the FDA’s appeal to delay — by up to 55 years — the release of documents requested in August, under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), by the Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency (PHMPT).

PHMPT, a group of more than 30 scientists, medical professionals, international public health professionals and journalists, asked the FDA for “all data and information for the Pfizer vaccine,” including safety and effectiveness data, adverse reaction reports and a list of active and inactive ingredients.

In September, PHMPT sued the FDA, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, for failing to respond to the FOIA request.

Norman called the FDA’s request to delay release of the documents “the beginning of a very bad joke.”

In a statement, Norman said:
“The FDA’s only priority should be the health and safety of consumers. The agency has compromised its integrity by delaying information that belongs to the public. Since the Biden administration is hell-bent on forcing these vaccine mandates on us, the public has every right to know how this vaccine was approved, especially in such a short amount of time.

“After all, the FDA managed to consider all 329,000 pages of data and grant emergency approval of the Pfizer vaccine within just 108 days. So it’s hard to rationalize why it now needs 55 years to fully release that information to the public.”

The FDA asked to be allowed to provide 500 pages a month, which would mean 658 months — or just under 55 years — for the full release.

Aaron Siri, one of the lawyers representing PHMPT, said the lawsuit was filed in September after the FDA “produced nothing” from the August FOIA request.

Siri wrote on his Injecting Freedom Substack page:

“So, let’s get this straight. The federal government shields Pfizer from liability. Gives it billions of dollars. Makes Americans take its product. But won’t let you see the data supporting its product’s safety and efficacy. Who does the government work for?

Read more 🗞 CHD

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

Declaration of Helsinki’s final and only “official” version

This was added to the declaration of Helsinki’s final and only “official” version which was finalized in Oct 2012 and this added to complete it in Oct 2016.

WMA DECLARATION OF TAIPEI ON ETHICAL OCT 2016

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

Dear fellow doctors!

Covid Vaccine Injuries, [Sep 5, 2021 at 1:25 AM]
My call to fellow doctors for immediate intervention

Closing Panel Session with Catherine Austin-Fitts, Dr. Thomas Binder, Prof. Sucharit Bhakdi, Dr. Reiner Füllmich and Patrick Henningsen, moderated by Assoc. Prof. Michael Palmer, greeting address by Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

During two days, we heard many real experts in their fields. My current state of ignorance, as a curious ordinary doctor, is, simply put, this:

An endemic of a seasonal beta corona cold virus, that may kill some people, of course, that is becoming more and more harmless through permanent mutation, has been inflated into a pandemic of a perennial killer virus, that is becoming increasingly dangerous through erratic mutation – alpha, beta, gamma, delta, epsilon and so on and so forth – with PR, PCR, masks and the myth of epidemiologically relevant asymptomatic transmission, and fought with serial unnecessary, ineffective, unsafe experimental mRNA and DNA injections.

This tapeworm sentence shorter:
Mainly the test causes the disease, not the virus.

Or even shorter:
The test is the pest.

Not only the test is the pest, of course. The entire prevailing corona narrative is nonsense. It justifies the globally dominating unscientific, inhumane madness. Such can be wrought with any respiratory virus: if we no longer test all people with a hypersensitive, low-specific RT-PCR test, that cross-reacts with other viruses, for theoretically one single RNA fragment of SARS-CoV-2, but for one of, say, influenza or metapneumoviruses, we immediately have an influenza or metapneumovirus testing pandemic.

Currently the pest, in proper English the plague, is morphing from unscientific, unmedical mass testing into applying inhumane experimental mass injections.

These injections, first and foremost for children, are utterly pointless and for many healthy people, both acutely and chronically, disabling and life-threatening.

Dear fellow doctors!

It is our duty and responsibility to follow the Hippocratic Oath, primum non nocere, first do no harm, and the Geneva Declaration of the World Medical Association, especially:

I will not use my medical knowledge to violate human rights and civil liberties, even under threat.

During times of universal deceit, nobody may trust in anybody. We doctors must no longer put unconditional trust in scientists, medical associations, health authorities or even in the once most respected medical journals. And first and foremost we must not trust ourselves, because more dangerous than ignorance is to believe that we know something beyond any doubt.

We must acquire all the information that is important for the health of our patients and of the whole society and we must verify it ourselves.

We all let ourselves become deluded, some less long, others for longer time. No one needs to apologise for this. But we can no longer apologise after, once informed, we still are useful frontline idiots in this global crime against humanity.

If we doctors stop participating, first and foremost by no longer applying unnecessary, ineffective, unsafe experimental mRNA and DNA injections, the corona nonsense house of cards will immediately collapse.

Wake up, stand up and act, accordingly, now!”

https://www.thomasbinder.ch/post/my-call-to-fellow-doctors-for-immediate-intervention

 

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.