Tag Archives: How to document the testing done on the edit checks?


Get CDC flu statistics for past years for your state here: https://bit.ly/3iWOZxg

This has never been about a virus in the first place. It’s all Political. They wanted to crash the economy and then blame Trump. Russia didn’t work. Impeachment didn’t work. Soon after we had the Coronavirus. It’s all BS.

CDC gates and health officials have taken over our government based on a lie.

The Vaccine is a deadly weapon! You have every right to protect yourself with any means necessary against foreign and domestic terrorists.

Or in the case of the fairy tale of Covid – people usually die from being VENTED and having their lungs blown out. Did you see that documentary by Journeyman Pictures with that Nurse who went to Elmhurst Hosp in NY? They murdered those people!

My wife said that a nurse sent a box covid swabs that never touched human skin to get tested by the CDC and many came back positive.

Churches can’t sing, but the protesters not wearing masks can chant?!

The “second wave” is going to be created by individuals with respiratory issues caused from wearing a mask. The Democrat politicians are trying to get people dependent on the government i.e. socialism programs. This is all about shame, fear, guilt, compliance, and conditioning.

Papayas, motor oil and a goat tested positive. I guess if I test positive Im in good company.

90% of the sheeple are wearing masks in my town. Especially the black folks they seem to be really scared.

The PCR Testing Debacle
Pamela A. Popper, President
Wellness Forum Health
Over 100 companies are currently producing tests for COVID-19, and these tests were approved by the FDA under emergency authorization with almost no validation. The test makers only had to show that the tests performed well in test tubes and no real-world demonstration of clinical viability was required.[1] Each vendor has established its own and as-yet-unmeasured accuracy. The variations are myriad, with some some tests able to detect as few as 100 copies of a viral gene while others require 400 copies for detection.[2] Additionally, most will show positive results for as long as 6 months, while the actual time a person is contagious is only a few days.
The accuracy of tests is important since numbers of “cases” is the metric used to determine business closures, event cancellations, lockdowns, withdrawal of civil rights and liberties, whether or not people can congregate, and if the dreaded masks are required.
One of the most widely used tests is the polymerase chain reaction (PCR), which involves examining a sample of mucus from a person’s nose or throat to look for COVID-19 genetic material. Biochemist Kary Muliis is the inventor of the PCR test and won the Novel Prize in chemistry for his invention in 1993. Mullis stated in 2013 that PCR was never designed to diagnose disease. The test finds very small segments of a nucleic acid which are components of a virus. According to Mullis, having an actual infection is quite different than testing positive with PCR. According to Mullis, PCR is best used in medical laboratories and for research purposes.
Dr. David Rasnick, also a biochemist and founder of a lab called Viral Forensics, agrees.
“You have to have a whopping amount of any organism to cause symptoms. Huge amounts of it. You don’t start with testing; you start with listening to the lungs. I’m skeptical that a PRC test is ever true. It’s a great scientific research tool. It’s a horrible tool for clinical medicine. 30% of your infected cells have been killed before you show symptoms. By the time you show symptoms…the dead cells are generating the symptoms.”
When asked about having a COVID-19 test he stated, “Don’t do it, I say, when people ask me. No healthy person should be tested. It means nothing but it can destroy your life, make you absolutely miserable.” He went on to say, “Every time somebody takes a swab, a tissue sample of their DNA, it goes into a government database. It’s to track us. They’re not just looking for the virus. Please put that in your article.”[3]
In fact, PCR testing was already shown to be wildly inaccurate almost 15 years ago.
In 2006, massive PCR testing was performed at the Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center when it was thought that the medical center was experiencing an epidemic of whooping cough. Almost 1000 healthcare workers were furloughed until their test results were returned. Over 140 employees were told that they had whooping cough, and thousands of others who tested positive were given antibiotics and/or a vaccine for whooping cough.
Almost eight months later, employees received an email from the hospital administration which stated that the entire episode was due to PCR testing error. Not even one case of whooping cough was confirmed with a more reliable follow-up test, and it was determined that the employees just had a common cold, not whooping cough.[4]
Apparently, this history was ignored as incompetent health officials like Mr. Fauci decided that ginning up cases was more important than following the science. Thus a test that the developer said was not useful for diagnosis and that had been previously shown to be inaccurate 100% of the time was recommended for COVID-19.
A recent meta-analysis published in the British Medical Journal looked at the accuracy of PCR testing specifically for COVID-19. The researchers reported that while no test is 100% accurate, the sensitivity and specificity of a test is evaluated by comparison with a gold standard, and there is no gold standard for COVID-19. One of the reasons is that it is impossible to know the false positive rate without having tested people who don’t have the virus along with people who do, and this was never done.
The analysis showed that the false negative rate ranges between 2% and 29%. Accuracy of viral RNA swabs was highly variable. In one study, sensitivity was 93% for broncho-alveolar lavage, 72% for sputum, 63% for nasal swab, and only 32% for throat swabs. The researchers stated that results vary for many reasons including stage of disease.[5] This analysis was published in May – long after Mr. Fauci and his accomplices had succeeded in creating a false pandemic, in part by insisting that more and more people should be tested.
Fortunately, many people are far more diligent than Fauci in checking out facts.
Investigators from OffGuardian contacted the authors of four papers published in early 2020 in which researchers claimed that they had discovered a new coronavirus. The investigators asked for proof that electron micrographs showed purified virus and all four groups replied that they did not.
Here are the verbatim responses from the four groups:
“The image is the virus budding from an infected cell. It is not purified virus.”
“We could not estimate the degree of purification because we do not purify and concentrate the virus cultured in cells.”
“[We show] an image of sedimented virus particles, not purified ones.”
“We did not obtain an electron micrograph showing the degree of purification.”
The investigators also contacted virologist Charles Calisher and asked if he knew of any research group that had isolated and purified SARS-COV-2 and he replied that he did not. They concluded at this time no one knows whether or not the RNA gene sequences used in the in vitro trials and which were used to calibrate the tests came from SARS-CoV-2.[6]
All of this may explain why some of the testing results from around the world have been so difficult to understand or explain. For example, testing in Guangdong province in China showed that 10% of people who recovered from COVID tested negative and then tested positive again.[7] Twenty-nine patients tested in Wuhan tested negative, then positive, and then the results were “dubious.”[8]
According to Wang Chen, president of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, PCR tests are only 30-50% accurate.[9]
And the CDC agrees. A statement in its online instruction manual for PCR testing includes these statements:
Detection of viral RNA may not indicate the presence of infectious virus or that 2019-nCoV is the causative agent for clinical symptoms”
This test cannot rule out diseases caused by other bacterial or viral pathogens.”[10]
The FDA’s online emergency use authorization includes this statement:
“positive results […] do not rule out bacterial infection or co-infection with other viruses. The agent detected may not be the definite cause of disease.”[11]
In fact, the manufacturers’ instruction manual for one PCR test includes these statements:
These assays are not intended for use as an aid in the diagnosis of coronavirus infection”
For research use only. Not for use in diagnostic procedures.”[12]
The bottom line is that this test is useless for diagnosing CoVID-19. If the error rate is only 5% this could mean that the number of cases worldwide is off by millions. But the error rate is most likely much higher, which means that that the world’s population is suffering due to a made-up pandemic, as I’ve been stating for months.
Fauci is supposed to be the world’s leading virology expert and we are all told regularly that we should listen to him and carefully follow his instructions. If he is, indeed, an expert, he must have known all of this for a very long time. He should be held personally accountable for the death and destruction he has caused in this country. His actions are criminal. On the other hand, if he is a feckless and incompetent fool, he should be fired immediately. In either case, testing should stop, and we should immediately begin the process of returning to normal.
[1] Pride D. “Hundreds of different coronavirus tests are being used – which is best?” The Conversation April 4 2020
[2] IBID
[3] Farber C. Was the COVID-19 Test Meant to Detect a Virus?” https://uncoverdc.com/2020/04/07/was-the-covid-19-test-meant-to-detect-a-virus/ accessed 7.2.2020
[4] Kolata G. “Faith in Quick Test Leads to Epidemic That Wasn’t.” New York Times Jan 22 2007
[5] Watson J, Whiting PF, Brush JE. “Interpreting a covid-19 test result.” BMJ 2020 May;369:m1898
[6] Engelbrecht T, Demeter K. “COVID19 PCR Tests are Scientifically Meaningless.” Off Guardian Jun 27 2020
[7] Koop F. “A startling number of coronavirus patients get reinfected.” ZME Science Feb 26 2020
[8] Li Y, Yao L, Li J et al. “Stability issues of RT‐PCR testing of SARS‐CoV‐2 for hospitalized patients clinically diagnosed with COVID‐19.” J Med Virol 2020 Mar;92(7)
[9] Feng C, Hu M. “Race to diagnose coronavirus patients constrained by shortage of reliable detection kits.” South China Morning Post Feb 11 2020
[10] CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download
(LABORATORY CORPORATION OF AMERICA) https://www.fda.gov/media/136151/download

Coronavirus: Is this how they plan to steal and sell your DNA?

Governments everywhere are busy rolling out antibody testing programmes.

Antigen tests, which involve taking a swab from the nose or throat, simply show if someone actually has the coronavirus in their body.

Antibody tests involve taking a blood sample and looking to see if the body contains antibodies which respond to the virus. If you have antibodies in your blood then you have had and have overcome the coronavirus. The blood sample will be sent off to a laboratory to be tested. This will be a much bigger testing programme then the antigen testing.

Governments are planning to do millions of antibody tests on their populations.

And the key words here are `blood sample’.

Because when you take a blood sample you can, of course, easily take a DNA sample. (You can take DNA samples with other body tissues but blood is so easy.)

And if that thought doesn’t strike terror into your heart then you really haven’t been paying attention.

Since March of 2020, governments everywhere have been tearing up all the traditional values which we used to take for granted.

Freedom, democracy and privacy are now just a thing of the past.

Most people in the western world are now living in police states. The Emergency Bill which was passed by the British Government in March gave British politicians and civil servants much the same sort of power over the people that the Patriot Act gave the authorities in America.

We all might as well be living in China or Russia for all the freedom we have these days.

And don’t kid yourself that the governments will give back all that power in a few months’ time. Governments never give back power they’ve taken.

So, to get back to your DNA.

If you trust your government to always do the right and decent thing then you can switch off now. I envy you your innocence and your faith.

I suspect, however, that most people have by now lost what little faith they had in their government and its advisors.

I have shown in other videos how we have been lied to, tricked, manipulated and brainwashed.

I think I’ve had the coronavirus and if I have to have an antibody test I expect that the Government will also take my DNA.

And I expect them to store it.

Along with your DNA.

And everyone else’s DNA.

The next big question is what will they do with it?

And this, again, is a question of trust.

Do we trust them to store our DNA so that they might be able to use it to help us one day?

Sadly, if we believe that then we are well into tooth fairy territory.

I think governments everywhere will take our DNA and store it.

And I think they will sell it.

Governments at all levels have a track record. They sell every bit of information they can collect.

They’ve been selling information about voters for decades.

They sell census information.

They demand private and confidential information.

And then they flog it to anyone prepared to pay the right price.

In the UK, the NHS has been collecting information about us all for years. To begin with they promised they wouldn’t sell the information. They actually gave us an option. If we didn’t want them to sell our private medical information to drug companies then we could say so. And they wouldn’t.

Well, that’s what they said.

But I think they sold it anyway.

Look on the NHS website and you will see that they say that the NHS collects confidential patient information from all NHS organisations and all private organisations providing NHS funded care.

They then flog this information to researchers, to the medical establishment and, wait for it because this is the good bit, to drug companies.

They say that the drug companies won’t use it for marketing or insurance purposes.

They presumably know that because the companies they sell it to tell them they won’t.

There is still a get out clause if you don’t want them to sell your information but its got more holes in it than a colander.

The same is true everywhere.

Private medical information is sold to anyone prepared to buy it.

And this brings us back to your DNA.

I don’t think they will be able to resist storing our DNA when they do antibody tests.

And they will sell it.

Of course they will. They’ll say that since they took the sample then they own your DNA. And they’ll flog it to drug companies, insurance companies and anyone else who wants to buy it.

Governments have already created biobanks with genetic material they took from screening tests. And now governments everywhere need huge amounts of money to pay for the coronavirus mess they have made of the world.

Does all this matter?

Well, I rather think it does.

Drug and insurance companies will know everything about your body. And they will be able to mix and match that with the information they buy from search engines, your bank, the supermarkets and everyone else. The last vestige of your privacy will be gone.

And they will use the information ruthlessly.

As an aside, let me just tell you that since my wife was diagnosed with breast cancer both she and I have been bombarded with utterly unnecessary and inappropriate online advertisements for funeral services, cancer charities and other goodies. I don’t know who sold our information but it doesn’t really matter where they got it, does it? To say that I find it intrusive is to be considerably politer than I feel.

I strongly suspect that we will have no rights over our DNA.

They will, of course, pass our DNA details onto all police and security services.

We can all trust them, can’t we?

Drug companies will use your DNA to predict what diseases you might develop. And they will want to sell you useful drugs to stop you getting whatever it is they know you’re going to get wrong with you.

Insurance companies will use your DNA to predict your future. You will, perhaps, find that your premiums suddenly soar because your insurance company knows something about your future.

Employers will doubtless see your DNA details and be unwilling to hire you if they see something in your future that doesn’t appeal.

How many job candidates will find themselves being refused time and time again because prospective employers see that they are likely to develop Parkinson’s disease or dementia or drug addiction.

Your DNA information will be used in conjunction with your credit card and bank information too, of course. And that will be so much easier when they get rid of nasty, grubby cash.

And they will mix it with all the information you’ve put on social media and which you cannot erase however hard you try. Anything you ever put on Facebook, for example, belongs to Facebook. Permanently, as in for ever.

So, you will be standing at the check out at the supermarket and the assistant will take the chocolate bar out of your shopping.

`What’s the matter with that?’ you will ask, puzzled.

`The system says you can’t have that,’ the assistant will say. She will look at the screen in front of her. `You’re going to get diabetes so you aren’t allowed to buy chocolate.’

When you apply for a driving licence they will tell you that you can’t have one.

`Why not?’ you will ask.

`Because there is an 82% chance that you are going to develop epilepsy next year,’ they will tell you.

You will have no rights over your private information. Companies everywhere will be able to buy it and hackers will be able to steal it.


The woman in charge of Britain’s track and trace system was in charge of a phone company called TalkTalk when hackers stole the personal information of 157,000 people. The company was fined massively for not looking after the information properly. Now she is in charge of the tracking and tracing system and the collection of vast amounts of personal information.


What can we do about it?

Well, until they make it compulsory I don’t think I’ll bother having an antibody test done thank you very much.


Dr Vernon Coleman MB ChB DSc FRSA

Fair Use Notice: Images/logos/graphics on this page contains some copyrighted material whose use has not been authorized by the copyright owners. We believe that this not-for-profit, educational, and/or criticism or commentary use on the Web constitutes a fair use of the copyrighted material (as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law).

Top 3 Posts at (EDC Developer)

Fist, I would like to thank everyone who has read articles posted at {EDC} Developer. Especially, my colegas and friends from India. The highest reading and hits have come from people living in India.

New to the industry? Want to get in as clinical data manager or clinical programmer? Looking for a particular topic or an answer to a question? check the contact me section.

Here are the top most searched articles this past few months:

1- Data Management: Queries in Clinical Trials

2- How to document the testing done on the edit checks?

3- Why use JReview for your Clinical Trials?

Others most read articles:

Role of Project Management and the Project Manager in Clinical Data Management

4 Programming Languages You Should Learn Right Now (eClinical Speaking)

Data Management Plan in Clinical Trials

For the search term used to find {EDC} Developer:

1-types of edit checks in clinical data management

2-Rave programming

3- pharmaceutical terminology list

4-seeking rave training (better source is mdsol.com)

5- edc programmer

6-central design tips and tricks

Thank you for reading!