Tag Archives: Gilead Sciences.

Remdesivir: A Child Sacrifice

Child Sacrifice: The FDA Approved Remdesivir Based on a Trial in Which 3 out of 53 Children Died

The trial was conducted by Gilead, the developer of remdesivir, and there was no control group.

The mortality rate of children with no treatment against COVID is 0.005% (1 in 20,000 die).

Based on this trial, the mortality rate of children with remdesivir treatment is 5.66% (1 in 17.7 die).

Dr. Meryl Nass: “Over 70% had an adverse reaction, 21% had a serious adverse event, and three of the children died. Because there was no control group, it’s unclear how either Gilead or the FDA determined that the drug benefited children, because there’s nothing to compare it to.”

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

Remdesivir Research & Documents

Ebola Study – Remdesivir

https://thedrardisshow.com/remdesivir-research-and-documents

ebola remdesivir study

Source: https://thedrardisshow.com/forms

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

Hospitals given green light to kill

Hospitals given green light to kill
https://www.bitchute.com/video/3vnTduJvCyXG/

Anna de Buisseret
@AnnadeBuisseret
I predict a tsunami of arrests in 2022. All those who are participants in these crimes against humanity, genocide, discrimination, medical apartheid, offences against the person, assault, fraud, harassment, coercion and other criminal acts are facing arrests and trials.

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.;

DR. ARDIS INTERVIEW – DEATH BY REMDESIVIR

THE ILLUSION LYNCHPIN OF COVID-19 RISK

Joining me today is Dr. Ardis, here to discuss the use Remdesivir in the treatment of COVID-19, how and why it was chosen, and what the use of this dangerous product has done to the health of the US population. The entirely predictable fall out from this drug’s use has been used to manipulate the perception of the risk true COVID-19 poses to the population.

Source Links Can Be Found Here:
https://www.thelastamericanvagabond.com/dr-ardis-interview-death-by-remdesivir-illusion-lynchpin-covid-19-risk

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

After the third JAB, most of the T-cells will be destroyed…They will take the JABS the rest of their lives…

CULT-LIKE COVID-19 TACTICS AND PHONY PROTOCOLS WITH DR. BRYAN ARDIS | MARYAM HENEIN

Doctor Bryan warns to stay OUT OF THE HOSPITALS and says the PROTOCOL in HOSPITALS is killing PEOPLE.

Source: TruthLivesHere,

INVENTOR OF MRNA VACCINES

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

Untold history of Remdesivir

Behind the benign image of Remdesivir vaccine manufacturer, Gilead Science has a dark history of allegations of bioterrorism, including having Pentagon to bomb a competitors factory under the false pretext of association with Al-Qaeda.

Igor Kirillov, the Head of the Russian Forces for radiological, chemical and biological weapons was of the opinion that with the Sovaldi tests, the pharmaceutical firm Gilead Sciences was testing out illegal arms for the Pentagon.

India was arm-twisted to grant patent to Gilead Sciences for the same drug in India.

Gilead was also part of the vaccine lobby at whose behest WHO faked a pandemic in 2009.

MUST READ & SHARE 👉🏾 https://greatgameindia.com/gilead-sciences-the-coronavirus-vaccine-manufacturer-accused-of-bioterrorism/

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

Big Pharma Business Model Is Serious Obstacle to Wiping Out COVID-19: Report

New research released today by Global Justice Now examines the history of some of the leading corporations producing coronavirus medicines, warning that their business model is likely to make controlling the pandemic more difficult, despite the rapid production of vaccines.

The report, The horrible history of Big Pharma: Why we can’t leave pharmaceutical corporations in the driving seat of the Covid-19 response, finds that 6 of the biggest corporations in the coronavirus market generated $266 billion last year, with profits totalling $46 billion. Judged by revenue, Johnson & Johnson is more wealthy than rich countries like New Zealand and Hungary. Pfizer’s revenues are bigger than oil-rich Kuwait or Malaysia.

Yet these same corporations have taken billions of dollars from governments like the UK in research and manufacturing funding, as well as presales of medicines.

While this vast mobilisation of public money has been effective in producing vaccines in record time, the Big Pharma model means that these vaccines and treatments have essentially been “privatised”. That matters, campaigners claim, because it means rich countries being prioritised in terms of distribution, and it leaves governments with no leverage over the pricing of these drugs, making it harder to control coronavirus.

The report examines the history of some of the corporations producing these medicines:

  • Pfizer and its UK distributor hiked the price of on anti-epilepsy drug which 48,000 NHS patients relied upon. As a result, NHS annual expenditure on their capsules rose from about £2 million to £50 million in a year. UK wholesalers and pharmacies faced price hikes of 2,300% – 2,600%.
  • GlaxoSmithKlein was handed a $3 billion fine after it admitted to giving kickbacks to doctors in the US and encouraging the prescription of unsuitable antidepressants to children. Doctors and their spouses were flown to five-star resorts, given $750, and access to snorkelling, golf and deep-sea fishing.
  • Gilead introduced a Hepatitis C drug to the US market at $84,000 per course. A US Senate investigation concluded: “it was always Gilead’s plan to max out revenue, and that accessibility and affordability were pretty much an afterthought.” Gilead corporate profits increased fivefold to $21.7 billion after the release of this and another very highly priced Hep-C drug.
  • Pfizer and GSK produce a vitally important pneumonia vaccine, which health NGO MSF claim has earned the companies over $50 billion while 55 million children are unable to access to the pneumonia vaccine, largely due to high prices.

Campaigners claim these examples are inherent in a model driven by the need for very high returns, and that these trends are already at play during the pandemic:

  • Pfizer has made no promise to limit profits, and has pre-sold over 1 billion doses to rich governments, representing just 14% of the world’s population.
  • Moderna’s corporate executive have made tens of millions of dollars this year in automated share sales which former US regulators have called “highly problematic” and worthy of investigation. Moderna’s vaccine has been made with public money, yet the company is expected to charge between $64 and $74 per person for immunisation.
  • Gilead made an extraordinary application for ‘orphan status’ on its drug remdesivir, which would have given it special protection owing to the fact the drug would be useful to a tiny number of patients – the very opposite of a pandemic. A public outcry led to withdrawal of the request.
  • The vaccine being developed by Oxford University was to be produced on a nonexclusive, royalty-free basis. However, on entering a deal with AstraZeneca, the situation changed. The deal is now exclusive and while the company maintains it will not profit during the pandemic, it has failed to release details of its contract and how it calculates research costs.

Nick Dearden, director of Global Justice Now, said:

“What’s been achieved during this pandemic by dedicated scientists and researchers is incredible. It’s amazing that they’ve discovered these potential vaccines in just under a year. That’s thanks to unprecedented amounts of government money poured into research. But given the public has paid for most of this research, any vaccines that come out should be owned by the public – true people’s vaccines. That would mean we could get vaccines out to those who need them in a fair way, prioritising the most vulnerable wherever they live.

“It’s beyond disgusting that a group of wealthy corporate executives and hedge funds are using this opportunity to further enrich themselves. Sadly, coronavirus has shown, once again, that the way we research and develop new medicines is not fit for purpose. We have a bunch of companies more interested in raking in massive profits than they are in providing for the needs of people around the UK and around the world. We must change that.”

The report can be downloaded here.

*

Note to readers: please click the share buttons above or below. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet forums. etc.

Featured image is from Global Justice Now

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

After months of demonising HCQ and pushing Remdesivir

… Data backs remdesivir for COVID-19, rings hydroxychloroquine alarm bell – May 2020
… New COVID studies: Remdesivir yes, hydroxychloroquine no – Oct 2020

IT’S ALL CHANGE (who would have guessed)

W.H.O. Rejects Antiviral Drug Remdesivir as a Covid Treatment – NYT, Nov 19, 2020

***Comments from the WEB***

Remdesivir does not work for covid but it certainly worked for investors ,at least temporarily,after Trump put in a plug for them .

You mean it’s ineffective on fake viruses?

“Censorship Claims Another Victim: Honest-Journalism Giant, Del Bigtree’s “The Highwire”” by Robert F. Kennedy Jr.. In that article, we learn that Google is, among other things, a vaccine company! I kid you not.

 

FDA again caught rubber-stamping unproven tests, drugs and therapies while Fauci was caught lying for profit.

The world mostly forgot about Remdesivir it seems, after the badly overhyped medication developed initially by Gilead Sciences to treat ebola failed to show any efficacy in severely ill patients according to a massive WHO study. 

While the FDA nevertheless approved the medication, arguing the data had shown it had proven modestly effective in treating mild to moderate cases of the virus, the WHO had already made up its mind. And on Thursday evening, the WHO officially recommended that doctors shouldn’t prescribe the drug to treat patients suffering from COVID-19.

This, despite all those assurances from Dr. Fauci that the drug, which prior to COVID had been a major money loser for Gilead, would revolutionize care related to the virus.

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

Massive WHO Study Shows Remdesivir Doesn’t Lower COVID-19 Mortality

https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/massive-who-study-shows-remdesivir-doesnt-lower-covid-19-mortality

Profile picture for user Tyler Durden

Another speedbump has emerged in the drive to produce reliable COVID-19 therapeutics as a highly anticipated WHO drug trial called Solidarity found that Gilead’s COVID-19 treatment, remdesivir, had no substantial effect on a COVID-19 patient’s chances of survival. It also found that three other therapeutics were similarly ineffective.

The FT called the data a “significant blow” to efforts to find a drug that could help save late-stage COVID-19 patients. What’s more, none of the drugs “substantially affected mortality” or reduce the need to ventilate patients.

Other drugs examined in the trial included hydroxychloroquine, lopnavir and interferon regimes. All of them had “little effect” on hospitalized patients.

Along with failing to lower mortality, the results showed the drugs had little effect on how long patients stayed in the hospital.

The disappointing results appear to contradict widely hyped results from an earlier trial in April which appeared to show that the drug reduced recovery time from 15 to 11. Gilead later released data suggesting the vaccine might lower incidence of death, but that finding has not been confirmed in randomized trials.

Traders will recall that Gilead’s press releases touting inconclusive data helped pump the company’s stock in the spring. Since then, the treatment has been given to President Trump, though the president credited an antibody therapy from Regeneron as the drug that made the difference, calling it a “cure”.

Despite all this, the drug was given preliminary approval in both the US and the UK, and earlier in October the EU signed a deal to supply up to 500,000 treatments courses of the drug, with an option to add more. Now, it looks like the drug is potentially useless, showing the limitations of this strategy.

Gilead released the following comment to the FT.

“We are aware that initial data from the World Health Organization’s (WHO) SOLIDARITY Trial has been made public prior to publication in a peer-reviewed journal,” Gilead said in response to a request for comment. “The emerging data appear inconsistent with more robust evidence from multiple randomized, controlled studies validating the clinical benefit of [remdesivir].”

One expert quoted by the FT, which published leaked data (the WHO refused to comment on the grounds that the results hadn’t been formally released), said that a trial as large as Solidarity would have discovered a therapeutic benefit “if one existed”. The remdesivir arm of the trial involved 2,750 patients.

A US NIH study published last week found that the drug may have helped reduce hospital stays by as many as 5 days, but there was no discernible impact on mortality.

The findings make us wonder: why were all those ‘experts’ so optimistic about remdesivir in the first place?

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

#FauciTheFraud – REMDESIVIR ‘FALLS FLAT’

Repost from the-highwire-with-del-bigtree/

REMDESIVIR ‘FALLS FLAT’

In April, Dr. Fauci said the repurposed antiviral, Remdesivir, showed a “clear-cut, significant, positive effect in diminishing the time to recovery.” However, the WHO has now released the findings of its ‘Solidarity Trial,’ encompassing 400 hospitals around the world. Results indicate the drug has ‘fallen flat,’ prompting the WHO to declare it has “little to no effect” on hospitalized COVID-19 patients.

First Aired: Oct, 22, 2020

#Remdesivir #Therapeutics #Health #Covid19 #Fauci #DelBigtree #TheHighWire #WHO

***Opinions from the Web***

They’re really manipulating the appearance of data. Now, if you look at a chart of what countries in Europe are safe/dangerous blah blah blah, they’ll show you a color-coded map of how many people are tested in various countries, to imply that a lack of testing means the countries not testing are failing to protect their citizens, thus making them unhealthy by omission. It’s completely dishonest.

“…this thing has mutated over four thousand times.” WAIT…WHAT?How can that be when it has never been isolated, to begin with?

“The Illuminati govern through their subtle control of large corporations (cartels–especially finance, oil, defense, pharmaceuticals, media); government, mass media, secret societies, intelligence agencies, the military, law, churches, foundations, think tanks, NGOs and education. Chatham House in London (The Royal Institute of Internal Affairs) and Pratt House in New York (Council on Foreign Relations) are two main control mechanisms. Illuminati power is omnipresent yet the masses do not even know it exists.” (Illuminati – The Cult That Hijacked the World, Makow, 2008) The Blood of the Sheople in FRONT of Them https://www.bitchute.com/video/JuqaRWWVDL2w/