Tag Archives: fda recalls

Aborted fetal cells: It is now clear who is actually spreading “myths.”

FDA Incompetence and Ammunition Against Senator Richard Pan in One Fell Swoop

Because politicians and other high profile individuals were claiming that vaccines do not contain aborted fetal material, ICAN made a simple request to the FDA for “[d]ocuments sufficient to show that the MMR, Varicella and Hepatitis A vaccines contain material from the cell line of aborted fetal tissue.”

After 238 days, the FDA finally confirmed that there is material from aborted fetal tissue in these vaccines by referring ICAN to the package inserts for these products.

With that admission, someone should inform Dr. Richard Pan (California State Senator) and Stephen Sweeney (former New Jersey State Senator and Senate President), because both of them asserted that vaccines do not contain such aborted fetal material, including during their quest to eliminate religious exemptions to vaccination!

Dr. Pan even stated on the floor of the California Senate that “vaccines are not made from aborted fetal cells, that unfortunately is a myth” and that “the continuing production of those vaccines do not involve aborted fetal cells.” Dr. Pan’s website similarly states that it is a “MYTH” to claim that aborted fetal tissue or cells are present in the vaccines.

It is now clear who is actually spreading “myths.”

To share this legal update, please use this link: https://www.icandecide.org/ican_press/fda-incompetence-and-ammunition-against-senator-richard-pan-in-one-fell-swoop/

Source: https://www.icandecide.org

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

REGIONAL DIRECTOR FOR PFIZER COVID-19 VACCINE TRIALS BLOWS WHISTLE ON FRAUD BUT FDA SILENCES HER

Mirrored from the BMJ Youtube channel: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RaLxhFiOBYk

Brook Jackson blew the whistle on fraud over Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine trials, and expected the FDA to respond and correct everything.

The FDA did not even inspect the site, and when she went to the British Medical Journal (BMJ) to publish her report, Facebook marked the BMJ article as fake news through their fact checkers.

This is a typical tactic the FDA has been using for years.

Full article: https://healthimpactnews.com/2022/how-the-criminal-fda-protects-big-pharma-by-controlling-the-media/

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

CDC withdraws support for PCR tests #PCRDEMIC

https://americasfrontlinedoctors.org/news/post/cdc-withdraws-support-for-pcr-tests/

America’s Frontline Doctors, [Dec 20, 2021]
BREAKING: The CDC is withdrawing its standing request to the FDA to grant emergency use authorization for Covid-19 PCR tests.

After 20 months of lies, the CDC can no longer hide that its use of Covid-19 PCR tests was fake “science” but true fear mongering.

https://t.me/AmericasFrontlineDoctors/392
https://t.me/AmericasFrontlineDoctors/393

The FDA issued a total recall of the ALL covid PCR swabs n June!!!!!! –

They stated that they are inaccurate, and “Use of these devices may cause serious injuries or death.”

STOP GETTING TESTED!!!!!

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

Vax Hysteria: CDC Dirty in 1976 – Worse Today.

Vax Hysteria: CDC Dirty in 1976 – Worse Today. Tools to Fight

https://www.redvoicemedia.com/2021/10/vax-hysteria-cdc-dirty-in-1976-worse-today-tools-to-fight/

Were felonies committed at the CDC in the weeks and months leading up to key policy decisions by both the FDA & CDC Director Walensky? 😡

See the Vaccine Safety Signals Everyone Can See 👀– Except Alleged Felons at the CDC & FDA who choose to ignore and bury them.

https://popularrationalism.substack.com/p/the-vaccine-safety-signals-everyone

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

 

Biden BUSTED As Pfizer ADMITS There’s No Vaccine Approved By FDA In The U.S. In Recorded Call

https://www.redvoicemedia.com/2021/10/biden-busted-as-pfizer-admits-theres-no-vaccine-approved-by-fda-in-the-u-s-in-recorded-call/

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

FDA REFUSES TO ENFORCE ITS OWN RULES AGAINST MISINFORMATION RELATED TO COVID-19 VACCINES

As you may recall from prior legal updates, ICAN has been enforcing the FDA’s conditions in its emergency use authorizations (EUA) for the COVID-19 vaccines which prohibit making claims that these vaccines were approved as safe and effective. ICAN, for example, has successfully forced public health departments, including in New York and Michigan, to remove false claims about the safety and approval of these vaccines.

But because this is supposed to be the FDA’s job, ICAN filed a Citizen Petition with the FDA on March 29, 2021 demanding that the agency do its job and enforce the conditions it created when it granted the EUAs for the COVID-19 vaccines. This includes demanding that the FDA assure that state health departments stop making false claims about these vaccines in violation of the FDA’s EUAs. The FDA could have easily produced this result with a simple letter to each state health department asking them to not violate the EUAs.

Instead, the FDA has done nothing. Six months after filing our petition, the FDA has stated: “Because of the existence of other FDA priorities, we have not been able to reach a decision on the petition at this time … We will respond to your petition as soon as we have reached a decision on your request.”

It is highly concerning, and telling, that enforcement of its own EUAs of a novel product being promoted, administered, and mandated nationwide is not an “FDA priority.” It also seems apparent that the FDA aims to respond to this petition only after it is moot: that is, after the vaccines are licensed and the EUAs are no longer in place.

If the FDA cannot be trusted to enforce its own simple conditions for its EUAs, it is understandable that the public does not trust them on more complex decisions. ICAN will continue to shed light on the failings of our public health authorities.

To share this legal update, please use this link: https://www.icandecide.org/ican_press/fda-refuses-to-enforce-its-own-rules-against-misinformation-related-to-covid-19-vaccines/

Source: www.icandecide.org/i

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

#Marburg: The New #Plandemic?

Did you know that Soligenix, is currently rushing to trial a ricin-rich vaccine RiVax® for #Marburg haemorrhagic fever?

#RiVax has Fast Track designation for the prevention of ricin intoxication by the US FDA. Approval of ricin toxin vaccine will utilize the FDA Animal Rule to eliminate the phase 1, 2 & 3 trials.

Why such a rush now, to trial a vaccine for which there has only been a total of 376 deaths since 1967 and only 16 deaths since 2005? The main component of the Rivax vaccine is #Ricin is a lectin and a highly potent toxin produced in the seeds of the castor oil plant.

Source: Dr. Tenpenny

Also watch “WHO Announces Marburg Virus” https://www.bitchute.com/video/l5Sye4N8UjFe/
Covid-19 May Have Just Been A Trial Run: Kieran Morrissey Explains The Worrying Marburg Virus.
Gates of Hell and the World Health Organisation may have something far deadlier and horrific in store for all of us – the Marburg virus!
Marburg virus is a hemorrhagic fever virus of the Filoviridae family of viruses and a member of the species Marburg marburgvirus, genus Marburgvirus. Marburg virus causes Marburg virus disease in humans and other primates, a form of viral hemorrhagic fever.
The virus is considered to be extremely dangerous.
The population problem is no longer a private matter.
In a world of nearly 4 billion people, population growth and how to restrain it are public concerns that command the attention of national and international leaders . . . .
It is quite clear that one of the major challenges now will be to curb the world’s fertility. . . .
One fact is clear: In a world of nearly 4 billion people, with some 150 independent governments, myriad races,
religions, tribes, and other organizations, major world problems like population and environmental protection will have
to be handled by large and complex organizations representing many nations and many different points of view.
Covid-19, and more importantly perhaps the Marburg virus, may well be the Illuminazi’s ‘final solution’.

Message mirrored from “theunmutualprisoner” https://www.bitchute.com/channel/theunmutualprisoner/

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

FDA PLAYING GAMES WITH THE PUBLIC REGARDING COVID-19 VACCINES

Today, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) showed its true colors and the game it plays with the public regarding Covid-19 vaccines.
As noted in a prior legal update, ICAN asked the FDA to lift the redaction of an undisclosed ingredient in the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine. The FDA refused. ICAN was therefore forced to file a formal Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request in order to have the redaction lifted. Only after this formal filing and public pressure – 15 days later – did the FDA produce to ICAN’s attorneys unredacted documents which reveal that the “proprietary” ingredient the FDA hid from the public was water.
The FDA literally, until today, took the position that it had to hide from the public the existence of “water” in the Pfizer vaccine because this fact was a “trade secret” or “confidential commercial or financial information.”
In revealing this ingredient, what the FDA revealed more than anything is the manner in which it conducts itself. If it tries to hide the existence of “water” in the Pfizer vaccine from the public, what else is it seeking to hide from the public? And what measures does the FDA take when it seeks to hide from the public information that is truly damaging to its interests or reputation?

The FDA has repeatedly assured the public that it will provide transparency for any Covid-19 vaccine it approves. That promise is inconsistent with its actions to date, including the above.  ICAN will continue to act as a watchdog over the FDA and its sister agencies.

To share this legal update, please use this link: https://www.icandecide.org/ican_press/fda-playing-games-with-the-public-regarding-covid-19-vaccines/

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

#CDCDECEPTION – ANYONE WHO DIES within 14 days of second jab…is counted as an UNVAXXED. Unbelievable.

In their own words, the CDC lists puts it in the fine print right there.
https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/pdfs/mm7034e5-H.pdf

cdc_unvaccinated_afterdaysmm7034e5-H

HOSPITALS #1 CAUSE OF DEATH: MEDICAL KIDNAPPING

Dr. Amandha Vollmer discusses how hospitals are now killing her patients with COVID protocols and holding them against their will in Medical Kidnapping. The medical system itself admitted back in 2013 that hospital errors were the 3rd leading cause of death in the U.S. Today hospitals are clearly the #1 cause of death in the U.S., and in probably most parts of the world.

https://medicalkidnap.com/2021/09/01/hospitals-now-1-cause-of-death-medical-kidnapping-the-norm-as-patients-are-sacrificed-on-the-altar-of-covid/

Source: HealthImpactNews

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

BionTech Comirnaty: FDA Lies and Deception

https://www.fda.gov/coronavirus-disease-2019-covid-19/comirnaty-and-pfizer-biontech-covid-19-vaccine

Anyone Else See A Conflict Of Interest In The Former Head of The FDA Being On The Board Of Pfizer?

 

A nurse said to me recently, “They wouldn’t give it to you if it’s not safe.”

Read on…
~~~~~~~~~~
Copied

Since when do you Trust The FDA TO TAKE CARE OF YOU and Your Family’s HEALTH.

Think twice or even 100 times before you make a decision to pop a pill..

Here is a list of some of the
FDA APPROVED DRUGS pulled off the shelf

✅Valdecoxib (Bextra)
Time on the market: 2001-2005
✅Pemoline (Cylert)
Time on the market: 1975-2010
✅Bromfenac (Duract)
Time on the market: 1997-1998
✅Levamisole (Ergamisol)
Time on the market: 1989-2000
✅Rofecoxib (Vioxx)
Time on the market: 1999-2004
✅Isotretinoin (Accutane)
Time on the market: 1982-2009
✅Sibutramine (Meridia)
Time on the market: 1997-2010
✅Terfenadine (Seldane)
Time on the market: 1985-1998
✅Troglitazone (Rezulin)
Time on the market: 1997-2000
✅Efalizumab (Raptiva)
Years on the market: 2003-2009
✅FDA Requests Removal of All Ranitidine Products (Zantac) from the Market

Glaxo Holdings Ltd, which is now known as GlaxoSmithKline, first sold Zantac in 1983. It was on the market for 36 years before it was taken off the market in 2019. According to Wired, as of 2020, 15 million Americans were taking ranitidine at prescription levels, with millions more taking lower doses of the drug.

https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-requests-removal-all-ranitidine-products-zantac-market

https://www.mdlinx.com/article/10-dangerous-drugs-recalled-by-the-fda/lfc-4008

https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/drug-recalls

 TO CLEAR UP THE APPROVED VS NOT APPROVED ISSUE:

There is no *available* FDA approved licensed vaccine”

If the FDA approved & licensed a COVID19 vaccine, it would have to revoke the other EUA vaccines & subject ALL vaccine makers to full liability risk. So it only approved a future vaccine that isn’t ‘available’.”

If the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine is going to be treated as an approved vaccine, then it should no longer be afforded the protections of an EUA.

I am now working with the attorneys at Americas Frontline Doctors AND former JAGS to protect the military.

#JustWait

Let the lawsuits begin. Dr. Jane Ruby

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.