Tag Archives: doctors censored

First Amendment Violation: U.S. government, CDC colluded with Google, Twitter, Facebook

U.S. government, CDC colluded with Google, Twitter, Facebook to censor important information about experimental covid vaccines.

https://www.naturalnews.com/2022-07-31-us-government-colluded-google-twitter-and-facebook-to-censor-truth-vaccines.html

I love when the evidence comes right out of the CRIMINALS’ own mouths

These are the emails between CDC Director of Digital, Carol Crawford telling Google, Twitter, and Facebook how they want them to censor and requiring lists of individual accounts!

Talk about a smoking gun!

https://rumble.com/v1e3cw3-leaked-emails-show-cdc-google-collusion-to-hide-vaxx-dangers.html

Don’t confuse the terms Misinformation and Disinformation with lies and assume that information is the truth.
This is 1984 Newspeak. If you haven’t read the book 1984 by George Orwell, we highly suggest you do.

“Misinformation” has nothing to do with Facts or Truth. “Information from source” is what they call “Information”, ie from Government, the Military Industrial Complex, Big Pharma, Big Corp and Big Tech calling themselves Elite.

“Misinformation” is simply “Not information from source” whether it is true or not. “Disinformation” is simply Information (true or not) that disagrees with “Source Information”.

Tedros is a PUPPET working for the corrupt organization dictating health and wellbeing of people. He is neither a doctor nor an expert to dictate the world but messaging to suppress freedom of speech and expression, taking away public fundamental rights.

Source: Dr Jane Ruby

WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. DHHS IG investigates CDC collusion with social media companies, including Facebook, Google, and Twitter, to push illegal covert propaganda. Records prove Biden Admin and Big Tech mislead public on pandemic; censored users who dissented.

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

They want to lockdown

Our mouths (masks)
Our speech (censoring)
Our jobs (lockdown and mandates)
Our supply chains
Our health & fertility (you know what)
Our guns
Our $ (inflation, digital $)
Our farms & food (eat bugs)
Our freedoms
Basically, our ability to live.

⚠️Documents show Bill Gates has given $319 million to media outlets to promote his global agenda

Including:
NPR: $24,663,066
The Guardian:  $12,951,391
Der Spiegel: $5,437,294
NBC: $4,373,500
Le Monde: $4,014,512
El País: $3,968,184
BBC: $3,668,657
CNN: $3,600,000
👇👇
https://twitter.com/Sgtnewsnetwork/status/1548362245486219265?s=20

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

You can see and say . . . nothing

Reposted by permission from Liberty Counsel Action.

You think censorship is bad now. After a pause of mere days, Joe Biden’s Department of Homeland Security (DHS) relaunched its “Disinformation Governance Board,” which former Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D-HI) nicknamed the Orwellian “Ministry of Truth” after the dystopian novel 1984.

We cannot afford to wait till the Disinformation Board cranks up to full throttle to operational status. Once lost, it is rare to restore freedom.

DHS has fully transformed the snitch motto of “If you see something, say something” to “You can see nothing and say nothing”—except what the government approves. DHS will now censor what the Biden administration labels “disinformation” ahead of the midterm elections! And don’t forget their desire to control the narrative on COVID, masks, shots and more.

That is why we must act now to stop it!

There is a bill in Congress that will completely defund and shut down this board. It is critical to act now to end this censorship. Overwhelm Congress with your faxes to demand that members of Congress immediately support, co-sponsor and pass this bill. — Mat

Joe Biden and his party are desperate to maintain control. Thus, the reason for this Disinformation Board. DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas admitted this new board will censor “disinformation and misinformation” ahead of the midterm election.

So, what is “truth”? Truth is whatever the Biden administration says it is. That’s how this Disinformation Board will operate—much like the often-discredited “fact checkers” paid by the Biden administration to censor you!

The new head of the board, Michael Chertoff, clerked under judicial activist Democrat Supreme Court Justice William J. Brennan Jr., and then was the U.S. attorney general in New Jersey. He was a principal author of the Patriot Act, which threw open the door for the government to spy on Americans and indefinitely detain them.

Chertoff then became head of the Department of Homeland Security and was soon blamed for mismanagement after Hurricane Katrina. He stepped down a few years later and has been in private law ever since.

This man has a history of pushing unconstitutional invasions of our rights. Sections of the Patriot Act have been ruled unconstitutional and were struck down by several judges.

Now, Chertoff will wield the power of the federal government over free speech and freedom of the press in America. What could go wrong?

No one should have this level of power, but especially not a person who has a track record of spying on Americans and locking people in jail indefinitely, before they are convicted—in direct opposition to our Constitution. Remember, under Obama-Biden and now Biden-Harris, “domestic terrorists” include law-abiding citizens.

I can’t help but remember the Chinese drones patrolling above the streets and broadcasting the message “Control your souls’ desire for freedom” as the government chained and padlocked starving people inside their apartments. We know where people who want to control your thoughts and movements wish to take our nation. This Disinformation Board is a serious threat to freedom of speech. We must stop it now before it’s too late!

Send your urgent faxes to Congress to demand an end to all funding for the Disinformation Board NOW.

Politicians in America are not the only ones involved in this massive push to censor speech.

The World Economic Forum (WEF) met recently. Julie Inman Grant was one of WEF’s handpicked presenters. After working as U.S. congressional staffer and then for Bill Gates, Grant is now Australia’s “eSafety Commissioner.”

At the WEF event, she stated: “Everything feels binary when it doesn’t need to be. So I think we’re going to have to think about a recalibration of a whole range of human rights that are playing out online, from freedom of speech. … ” She goes on to discuss “online violence,” “data protection” and “child dignity.”

I want to unpack the meaning and history of what she and other globalists mean by these words … because they don’t mean the same thing that you and I would normally understand them to mean.

In Grant’s world, “online threats” include speech with which she disagrees. Take COVID and the 2020 elections, for example. Biden and many media label discussing either topic as false, disinformation, misinformation and even dangerous to “democracy.”

After Barack Obama spoke at Stanford University on April 21, urging the government to censor online communication to save the “democracy,” the Biden administration rolled out the Disinformation Board just a few days later. Obama’s wish became Biden’s command.

To these censors, “child dignity” means everything from a child being allowed to get a secret abortion or a confused child being told “gender” can be a personal choice much like which outfit you wear or what career you choose. If you speak against puberty blockers, opposite sex hormones or life-altering surgery to remove healthy body parts, you will be censored—or worse, fined and fired.

Right now, we still have a choice. The Disinformation Board is a dangerous attack on America and the inalienable right of free speech. The board will censor information about elections, COVID, climate and much more.

We MUST stop this Disinformation Board! Send your urgent faxes to Congress to demand an end to the Disinformation Board NOW.

LC Action will be working hard on Capitol Hill to stop this DHS board. In addition to sending faxes and signing the petition, please support our ministry through a donation to our Challenge Grant. This will DOUBLE the impact of your donation today.

Onward,

Mat Staver, Chairman
Liberty Counsel Action

P.S. DOUBLE your donation through our Challenge Grant.

P.P.S. Send urgent faxes to demand Congress act immediately to defund this DHS board. Then sign our petition to leaders in Congress.

Sources:

“About the ESafety Commissioner: Julie Inman Grant.” Australian Government. Accessed June 1, 2022. eSafety.gov.au/about-us/who-we-are/about-the-commissioner.

Associated Press. “Judge Rules Part of Patriot Act Unconstitutional.” NBC News, Sept 26, 2007. Nbcnews.com/id/wbna20999950.

Associated Press. “Part of Patriot Act Ruled Unconstitutional.” Fox News, January 14, 2015. Foxnews.com/story/part-of-patriot-act-ruled-unconstitutional.

Evans, Zachary. “‘Control Your Soul’s Desire for Freedom’: Shocking Videos Emerge as Brutal Shanghai Covid Lockdown Drags On.” National Review on Yahoo! News, 2022. News.yahoo.com/control-soul-desire-freedom-shocking-191048377.html.

“If You See Something, Say Something®.” Department of Homeland Security, May 10, 2019. Dhs.gov/see-something-say-something.

Knowles, Michael. 2022. “The Mark Of The Beast Announced At World Economic Forum | Ep. 1013.” Julie Inman Grant at timecode 11:52. YouTube: Michael Knowles. May 25, 2022. Youtube.com/watch?v=uFgo964EjKY.

“Michael Chertoff.” Encyclopedia Britannica. Accessed June 1, 2022. Britannica.com/topic/United-States-Department-of-Homeland-Security.

Liberty Counsel Action is a 501(c)(4) tax-exempt non-profit organization. Donations are not tax deductible.

Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

Big Tech Plays Favorites When It Comes to Censorship

At a time when forthright social-media posts are slapped with “fact-check” labels, suppressed, or just plain taken down, why are mainstream media companies getting a free pass when they start to question vaccine imperialism? In recent letters to Meta and Twitter, our attorneys have called out the glaring inconsistencies in the way these platforms are applying their “misinformation” policies.

On March 29, 2022, the very day the CDC authorized a second and third COVID-19 booster injection for certain Americans, the New York Times (NYT), in a surprising turn, published an article arguing that the scientific evidence for giving a fourth shot was “incomplete, at best, that the only study backing it was “deeply flawed,” and that “most people are already well protected from severe illness.” It posted links to the piece on both Meta/Facebook and Twitter.

In the article titled, “Should You Get Another Covid Booster?,” the NYT took aim at Pfizer and Moderna for plugging the idea “without much evidence to back up their claims” and at the FDA for going along with this. The article even discussed “disadvantages” of another dose such as “diminishing results” and “side effects like fever, headache, fatigue and joint aches.”

Why, then, did Meta not sanction NYT for content that “implicitly discourages vaccination” or for material “promoting that others not get the COVID-19 vaccine,” as set out in its “vaccine misinformation” rules?

As our attorneys wrote to Meta, “Meta is clearly allowing this Article from a prominent news media company to exist on its platform when the Article directly contradicts America’s key public-health infrastructure organization—the CDC—even though Meta has taken action against countless other users who have posed similar questions or viewpoints that differ from the FDA and CDC recommendations.”

ICAN made similar observations in a separate letter to Twitter, this time questioning why the NYT got a free pass when Twitter has been far more punitive with other users who, for example, merely “highlight facts in official government data.” For example, Twitter labeled as “misleading” a tweet that posted a link to the U.K.’s Office for National Statistics (ONS) website because the tweet repeated the headline of an article analyzing the data: “Deaths among Teenage Boys have increased by 63% in the UK since they started getting the Covid-19 Vaccine according to ONS data.”

So it seems the NYT can freely back-pedal on its earlier narratives that cheerled, defended, and pushed at any cost COVID injections, while less favored outlets and individuals must endure the slings and arrows of big-tech censorship. As our attorneys’ letters demanded, these platforms must explain why they are inconsistently and unfairly enforcing their COVID’19 policies among users. If Meta and Twitter can exhibit such favoritism in applying their own rules, then those rules were disingenuous in the first place!

To share this legal update, please use this link: https://www.icandecide.org/ican_press/big-tech-plays-favorites-when-it-comes-to-censorship/

Source: https://www.icandecide.org

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

Tyranny

We are watching tyranny spread across the world.

Many are rightly outraged over the use of brute military force against innocent people.

Here in America, tyranny doesn’t need tanks, and coercion doesn’t require a powerful army.

Two years ago we were told to wash our hands frequently and stay safe. Now thousands of bank accounts are being frozen because people voiced opposition to extreme and unconstitutional abuses of emergency powers.

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau did not need tanks to strangle and conquer his enemies because he decided to control their wallets.

And you can be sure the United States government took notes.

Our enemies have done the same to America’s Frontline Doctors—from PayPal’s decision to cut off your ability to donate to us; to Amazon’s decision to shut our website down as it was hosted on their servers. And this week we received a notice from Google—they too are committed to censoring AFLDS. (More about that in an upcoming email).

In spite of it all, America’s Frontline Doctors is committed to fighting the battle to keep Americans free, and with western democracies now turning on their citizens, we need your support more than ever.

Please consider a 2022 gift today to America’s Frontline Doctors to help…

• Frontline News: AFLDS is producing and delivering news content committed to the truth—news you can TRUST;

• Our Legal Team committed to preserving our constitutional freedoms; and,

• Our Medical Community committed to preserving your health and your autonomy (with huge news coming in the next few weeks!).

Perhaps you are in a position to become one of our 2022 monthly donors. If so, please let me hear from you. Maybe this will be your first annual gift—and we would be grateful for your support.

The good news is people are rising up and they are not backing down. And we will never back down either. We are committed to liberty—and are thankful you are too. Join us today so that together you and I will stand strong and prevail.

For Liberty,

Source: America’s Frontline Doctors

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

17,000 DOCTORS

Note: I do not trust medical doctors because they push the convid 19 LIE as being real.
Its NOT real, its just the common cold/ flu we have EVERY year.

source; PIRATEPETE

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

Conflict of Interest: Facebook, Merck, and the CDC Foundation and Pfizer

Health Freedom Defense Fund, [Feb 17, 2022 ]
A White House email, obtained on behalf of ICAN, shows Facebook, Merck, and the CDC Foundation, whose corporate partners includes Pfizer, have formed an alliance “to use social media and digital platforms to build confidence in and drive uptake of vaccines.” No conflict there. https://www.icandecide.org/ican_press/ican-obtained-email-shows-alliance-between-white-house-facebook-and-pharma/

The REAL ANTHONY FAUCI

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

Event 201 from Oct 2019: “Attempts to control media messaging…

Event 201 from Oct 2019: “Attempts to control media messaging, originally aimed only at health-related misinformation, became used increasingly to quash political dissent”

https://youtu.be/LBuP40H4Tko

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

Silence: The story of COVID vaccine victims by @stkirsch

We are giving a voice to the silenced. 

Health Freedom Defense Fund, [Jan 23, 2022 ]
Silence: The story of COVID vaccine victims by @stkirsch

Lyrics and vocals by Julie Elizabeth who is vaccine injured.

https://rumble.com/vszi9y-silence-the-story-of-covid-vaccine-victims.htm

Lyrics and vocals by Julie Elizabeth who is vaccine injured.

Produced by the staff of the Vaccine Safety Research Foundation.

If you aren’t crying by the end of the video, you aren’t human.

Please help this go viral.

Song only on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4xJ1rQt9suQ

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

Murderer Dr Jennifer Flint at Children’s Mercy Hospital in Kansas City Mo.

Murderer Dr Jennifer Flint at Children’s Mercy Hospital in Kansas City Mo.

is giving Children Remdesivir causing them to go on ventilators and they are dying.

She claims she’s following hospital protocol and that this is all experimental.

Time to exposed all these criminals. Following orders or hospitals protocols is not an excuse. #Nuremberg2.0

Every provider in every hospital in every state in every city better know: WE ARE WATCHING!

We are powerful when we are united, and we are watching! Accountability will come for those that are perpetuating this evil, and WE THE PEOPLE will NOT tolerate it.

We will not stand by and watch these people drugged, vented, abused, assaulted and killed!

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.