Tag Archives: Clinical Trials

Fauci’s House of Horrors

“Fauci’s House of Horrors: NIH Spent 16+ Million in Taxpayer Funds on Disturbing ‘Toxic Brain Injection’ Experiments on Monkeys; “Drilled Holes in Their Skulls and Implanted Devices into the Brain””

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/10/faucis-house-horrors-nih-spent-16-million-taxpayer-funds-disturbing-toxic-brain-injection-experiments-monkeys-drilled-holes-skulls-implanted-devices-brain/

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

#CLINICALTRIALS: DOSE FINDING, CONTROLLED EXPERIMENT AND HEALTHY INDIVIDUALS

Look at the dates of this study. THEY KNOW!

https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04368728

This is a DOSE FINDING study without subjects’ knowledge & THAT’S WHY some will be “ok”, some will end up being disabled, & some will DIE.

THEY MUST KNOW Who got which doses, who got sick, how many got sick and how many died so far – They have the exact numbers for everything.

This is a CONTROLLED EXPERIMENT With a number of different and post out dosages to understand who escapes it, who gets sick only and who dies.

Title says “in Healthy Individuals” , but is it “safe and
effective” in people with cancer, MS, Lupus… etc ?

BOOSTERS ARE in the protocol – all in plain sight.

THEY KNOW…#CrimesAgainstHumanity

PROJECT CAMELOT, [Jul 20, 2021 at 5:22 AM]

REGARDING PRION DISEASE THE PRIONS ATTACH TO NANO AND JUMP… DISTANCE IS NOT AN ISSUE FOR THEM SO IT DOESN’T MATTER HOW CLOSE YOU ARE TO THE VACCINATED … THIS INFO WAS GIVEN TO ME BY A SCIENTIST WHO WORKED IN BLACK PROJECTS (ABOVE TOP SECRET… NANO AI JUMPS AND CANNOT BE STOPPED BY CONVENTIONAL MEANS…. THE CURRENT LOCKDOWNS WILL SLOW THE SPREAD BUT ONCE ALL THE VACCINATED GET OUT AND CIRCULATE IT WILL GET INTO EVERYONE… THE LOCKDOWNS WILL NOT LAST…. THE REAL OBJECTIVE IS TO INFECT EVERYONE WITH NANO AI AND TRACKING SMART DUST… https://beforeitsnews.com/health/2021/07/why-the-vaxxed-are-acting-strange-and-why-it-will-get-even-worse-3040605.htm

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

EVIDENCIA DE GENOCIDIO: Las Mascaras

Aquí hay una recopilación de evidencia de revistas científicas revisadas por pares, expertos médicos y medios de comunicación que demuestran explícitamente que las máscaras no funcionan.

Repost from Aryana Love at The Liberty Beacon

Aquí hay una recopilación de evidencia de revistas científicas revisadas por pares, expertos médicos y medios de comunicación que demuestran explícitamente que las máscaras no solo son ineficaces para contener la propagación de enfermedades infecciosas, virus e influenza, sino que también son extremadamente peligrosas para la salud.

Las máscaras no funcionan. No existe ningún estudio de este tipo que haya demostrado la eficacia de las máscaras para detener la propagación viral o infecciosa de la influenza. NO HAY EXCEPCIONES. Los grandes metanálisis y todos los ECA demuestran que no existe tal beneficio relativo. Las mascarillas y los respiradores no funcionan. La obligatoriedad de máscaras constituye un crimen de lesa humanidad y abuso infantil.

Cronograma 2020

febrero

Este es un estudio de WILEY publicado en febrero: “Eficacia de los respiradores N95 frente a las mascarillas quirúrgicas contra la influenza: una revisión sistemática y un metanálisis”.

CONCLUSIÓN: “Se incluyeron un total de seis ECA con 9.171 participantes. No hubo diferencias estadísticamente significativas en la prevención de la influenza confirmada por laboratorio, infecciones virales respiratorias confirmadas por laboratorio, infección respiratoria confirmada por laboratorio y enfermedades similares a la influenza utilizando respiradores N95 y mascarillas quirúrgicas. El metanálisis indicó un efecto protector de los respiradores N95 contra la colonización bacteriana confirmada por laboratorio (RR = 0,58, IC del 95%: 0,43-0,78). El uso de respiradores N95 en comparación con las mascarillas quirúrgicas no está asociado con un menor riesgo de influenza confirmada por laboratorio “.

Esencialmente, ni el N95 ni las mascarillas quirúrgicas son eficaces para proteger contra la influenza. – Ver enlace aquí.

marzo

The Independent publicó una historia en la que uno de los médicos más importantes de Inglaterra advirtió que los miembros del público podrían correr un mayor riesgo de contraer coronavirus al usar máscaras faciales: “Coronavirus: las máscaras faciales podrían aumentar el riesgo de infección, advierte el jefe médico” – Ver enlace aquí.

abril

Denis G. Rancourt, PhD Investigador de la Asociación de Libertades Civiles de Ontario, produjo un resumen que proporciona una lista de literatura médica que demuestra que las máscaras y los respiradores no funcionan: “Las máscaras no funcionan Una revisión de la ciencia relevante para la política social de COVID-19” – Ver enlace aquí.

El Dr. Rashid Buttar fue uno de los primeros expertos médicos en hablar con hechos médicos frente a un mar de desinformación de los principales medios de comunicación. Recomiendo encarecidamente ver esta entrevista de London Reel con el Dr. Rashid Buttar, donde explica en profundidad qué el Coronavirus se basa en ciencia sólida sin una agenda política. El Dr. Buttar también se sumerge en los daños del uso de máscaras: “LA AGENDA DEL CORONAVIRUS – LO QUE LOS MEDIOS PRINCIPALES NO QUIEREN QUE SEPAS” – Vea el video aquí.

Mayo

El ejercicio de simulación en vivo del Evento 201 Coronavirus para preparar a los líderes públicos y privados de una respuesta a una pandemia, se lanzó en octubre de 2019. Hemos estado en un ejercicio de capacitación orquestado por las élites. – Ver enlace aquí.

Los gobiernos dejaron claro desde el comienzo de este ejercicio de capacitación que nadie debería usar una máscara, pero en junio dieron un giro de 180 grados. – Ver video aquí.

La Agencia de Salud Pública de Canadá (PHAC) declara abiertamente en su sitio web que hay poca evidencia de que usar una mascarilla lo protegerá cuando esté saludable. – Ver enlace aquí.

Los CDC publicaron un informe en mayo que decía que usar máscaras faciales, lavarse las manos y desinfectar las superficies es inútil para prevenir la susceptibilidad a Covid19. Vea el enlace aquí.

New England Journal of Medicine publicó un estudio revisado por pares: “Enmascaramiento universal en hospitales en la era Covid-19”.

CONCLUSIÓN: “Sabemos que usar una máscara fuera de los centros de atención médica ofrece poca o ninguna protección contra las infecciones”. – Ver enlace aquí.

En mayo de 2020, Technocracy News and Trends publicó: “Blaylock: las máscaras faciales plantean graves riesgos para la salud”. El Dr. Russell Blaylock advierte que las mascarillas faciales no solo no protegen a los sanos de enfermarse, sino que también crean serios riesgos para la salud del usuario. La conclusión es que si no está enfermo, no debe usar una mascarilla:

“Se vuelve aún más aterrador. La evidencia más reciente sugiere que en algunos casos el virus puede ingresar al cerebro. En la mayoría de los casos, ingresa al cerebro a través de los nervios olfativos (nervios del olfato), que se conectan directamente con el área del cerebro que se ocupa de la memoria reciente y la consolidación de la memoria. Al usar una máscara, los virus exhalados no podrán escapar y se concentrarán en los conductos nasales, entrarán en los nervios olfativos y viajarán al cerebro “. – Ver artículo aquí.

“Al usar una máscara, los virus exhalados no podrán escapar y se concentrarán en los conductos nasales, entrarán en los nervios olfativos y viajarán al cerebro… la mayor parte de la evidencia apunta hacia la hipoxia y / o hipercapnia como la causa. Es decir, una reducción de la oxigenación sanguínea (hipoxia) o una elevación del C02 sanguíneo (hipercapnia) ”.

Se sabe que la máscara N95, si se usa durante horas, puede reducir la oxigenación de la sangre hasta en un 20%, lo que puede provocar la pérdida del conocimiento, como le sucedió al desafortunado hombre que maneja solo en su automóvil con una máscara N95, lo que provoca que se desmaye, se estrelle el coche y sufra lesiones. Estoy seguro de que tenemos varios casos de ancianos o cualquier persona con mala función pulmonar que se desmaya y se golpea la cabeza. Esto, por supuesto, puede conducir a la muerte “.

“La importancia de estos hallazgos es que una caída en los niveles de oxígeno (hipoxia) se asocia con un deterioro de la inmunidad. Los estudios han demostrado que la hipoxia puede inhibir el tipo de células inmunitarias principales que se utilizan para combatir las infecciones virales llamadas linfocitos T CD4 +. Esto ocurre porque la hipoxia aumenta el nivel de un compuesto llamado factor 1 inducible por hipoxia (HIF-1), que inhibe los linfocitos T y estimula una poderosa célula inhibidora inmunitaria llamada Tregs. Esto prepara el escenario para contraer cualquier infección, incluido COVID-19, y hacer que las consecuencias de esa infección sean mucho más graves. En esencia, su mascarilla puede ponerlo en un mayor riesgo de infecciones y, de ser así, tener un resultado mucho peor “.

También en mayo, Global Research enfatizó que las mascarillas conducen a la falta de oxigenación, un precursor de la fatiga, la debilidad y enfermedades graves como el cáncer. La disminución de oxígeno en el cuerpo siempre aumenta la acidez. El cáncer prospera en condiciones ácidas: “Desenmascarar la verdad: los estudios muestran que las máscaras deshumanizantes te debilitan y no te protegen” – Ver enlace aquí.

junio

En junio, River Cities Reader’s proporciona una lista vital de estudios revisados ​​por pares y literatura médica sobre máscaras, proporcionando puntos clave de anclaje a la extensa literatura científica que establece que el uso de máscaras quirúrgicas y respiradores (por ejemplo, “N95”) no reduce el riesgo de contraer una enfermedad verificada: “Las máscaras no funcionan: una revisión de la ciencia relevante para la política social de COVID-19” – Ver enlace aquí.

julio

Un mes después, CNN publicó este artículo: “La pandemia de coronavirus podría causar una ola de daño cerebral, advierten los científicos”. Vea el enlace aquí.

El Dr. Rashid Buttar fue uno de los primeros expertos médicos en hablar en contra de las máscaras y ha sido censurado tiránicamente por las grandes plataformas de redes sociales de tecnología. Explica que los poros de las fibras de las máscaras son mucho más grandes que las partículas que la gente intenta con miedo evitar.

Dr. Buttar: Las máscaras son una estafa y un abuso tiránico

https://www.bitchute.com/embed/AEPXedXb72ym/

El Dr. Buttar explica que las máscaras son una estafa y un abuso tiránico. Si alguien le dice que use una mascarilla, todo lo que tiene que decir es que tiene una exención médica. Si le preguntan cuál es su condición médica, están violando sus derechos de HIPAA y sus derechos de discapacidad estadounidense si se encuentra en los EE. UU. Nadie tiene derecho a preguntarte cuál es tu condición médica ni a obligarte a usar una mascarilla. Nadie.

agosto

La investigación global revela que las máscaras están condicionando a las personas a aceptar las vacunas obligatorias: “Máscaras – operación psicológica hacia las vacunas obligatorias” – Ver enlace aquí.

septiembre

Bigtree presentó a su hijo de 11 años que usaba una máscara N95 y probó los niveles de dióxido de carbono (CO2) en su interior que pueden causar toxicidad o privación de oxígeno cuando el CO2 aumenta a 5000 ppm, que es el límite para las exposiciones diarias en el lugar de trabajo, según OSHA. El medidor registró más de 10,000 ppm y se detuvo, todo en unos pocos segundos. Una máscara de papel y un pañuelo registraron más de 9000 ppm, y una pantalla facial de plástico registró 1500 ppm. Los niveles de aire de CO2 en interiores no deben ser superiores a 1100 ppm en el interior de las aulas. Https://d-4072647693542875860.ampproject.net/2011252111003/frame.html

Global Research señaló además un caso en el que el uso de máscaras por mandato o coacción por parte de los gobiernos es terrorismo psicológico también conocido como guerra: “COVID-19: El uso continuo de máscaras agrava el riesgo de infección. “Terrorismo psicológico”? – Ver enlace aquí.

octubre

El Dr. Buttar dio otra advertencia urgente en una entrevista de televisión: “Espere muertes masivas por las vacunas contra el coronavirus – Dr. Rashid Buttar en la segunda ola” – Vea el video aquí.

Global Research publicó “Las máscaras COVID-19 son un crimen contra la humanidad y el abuso infantil” – Vea el enlace aquí.

noviembre

World Doctors Alliance confirmó que dos niños alemanes de 14 años murieron debido a que usaban máscaras. Los principales medios de comunicación lo censuraron. El virólogo jefe de Irlanda, Dollores Cahill, dice que después de un minuto de usar una máscara se encuentra en un ambiente tóxico. Un empleador que lo obligue a usar una máscara es responsable de cualquier muerte por las máscaras que estén causando daños graves a las personas. – Ver enlace aquí.

OffGaurdian publicó esto: “Máscaras faciales: un peligro para nuestro planeta, nuestros niños y nosotros mismos” – Ver enlace aquí.

The Last American Vagabond hizo un excelente reportaje de noticias: “Los riesgos para la salud de las máscaras” – Vea el enlace aquí.

En noviembre, un médico en los Estados Unidos cerró de golpe las máscaras.

Médico: La verdad sobre las máscaras y su futilidad

https://www.bitchute.com/embed/77yae4jeu3So/

diciembre

El Dr. Merritt ha investigado las armas biológicas y las máscaras faciales y dice que las máscaras no funcionan. A los profesionales que empujan máscaras se les “paga o se juega”. – Ver video aquí.

Cáncer y máscaras

En Highwire: “LOS DENUNCIANTES DE LAS MÁSCARAS LO DICEN TODO”, las expertas en máscaras de OSHA capacitadas por el gobierno, Tammy Clark y Kristen Meghan, se unieron a Del en el estudio para analizar información vital sobre las máscaras, el PPE y su papel en la prevención del Covid-19. Revelan que el uso de mascarillas puede provocar ataques cardíacos y cáncer. Todos los adultos de este planeta que lleven una máscara necesitan escuchar esta fascinante discusión. – Ver enlace aquí.

Si el trabajo requiere que use una mascarilla, OSHA requiere que su empleador verifique que está recibiendo un nivel mínimo de oxígeno del 19.5% por ley. Los niveles de estrés sostenidos durante el encierro ilegal y por el uso de máscaras comprometen el sistema inmunológico humano. La cortisona es liberada por el sistema inmunológico en respuesta al estrés, suprimiendo y debilitando su sistema inmunológico. Esto es homicidio corporativo cometido por gobiernos y genocidio intencional.

Dr. Otto Warburg has also exposed these truths about cancer:

“Todas las células normales tienen un requisito absoluto de oxígeno, pero las células cancerosas pueden vivir sin oxígeno, una regla sin excepción … Privar a una célula del 35% de su oxígeno durante 48 horas y puede volverse cancerosa”.

La típica máscara azul que lleva la mayoría de las personas contiene teflón y otros productos químicos que causan cáncer. Las máscaras se “esterilizan” con óxido de etileno, un carcinógeno conocido. Muchos maestros de varias juntas escolares han experimentado síntomas importantes como resultado directo de los efectos de esta sustancia química. 2. Las máscaras contienen (no rociado con) PTFE, que forma el teflón junto con otras sustancias químicas que también causan cáncer. – Ver enlace aquí.

Cierres

El senador estadounidense Rand Paul dice que los encierros son ilegales. Rand Paul: No hay evidencia científica que los bloqueos “tiránicos” funcionen – Ver enlace aquí.

Conoce tus derechos

En noviembre, David Kurten publicó un Aviso de responsabilidad para las escuelas, redactado por el asesor legal de la World Freedom Alliance en el Reino Unido con respecto al uso de máscaras. Este documento notificará a sus escuelas sobre la responsabilidad personal por los riesgos asociados. – Ver enlace aquí.

La historia se repite – “Gripe española”

Los informes de autopsia de la pandemia histórica de 1918 revelaron que las máscaras obligatorias mataron a aproximadamente 30 millones de personas. Así que no fue la “gripe” lo que los mató durante la “gripe española”.

En un artículo escrito en coautoría por Anthony Fauci en el Journal of Infectious Diseases en 2008, revela que Fauci sabía que las máscaras mataron a millones de personas en la “pandemia” de 1918. Los informes de la autopsia expusieron la neumonía bacteriana secundaria causada por bacterias comunes del tracto respiratorio superior como la principal causa de muerte, no la “gripe”. A pesar de esto, el señor Fauci todavía imponía de forma coercitiva máscaras al pueblo estadounidense sabiendo que se enfermarían por las máscaras y lo están. – Ver enlace aquí.

Recomiendo leer “Las vacunas causaron la“ gripe española ”de 1918 que mató a millones” ya que ahora se están repitiendo genocidios históricos ”- Ver enlace aquí

También recomiendo ver “Pandemia histórica”. Vea el video aquí.

Finalmente, los dejo con esta recopilación de videos explosivos de expertos médicos censurados que advierten a la humanidad publicada en diciembre: “Pregunte a los expertos: ¡los médicos y los científicos hablan sobre el engaño de COVID-19 y el peligro de VAX!” – Ver video aquí.

••••

About the Author: Ariyana Love is a Goodwill Ambassador to Palestine (ICSPR), Chairwoman of an international foundation, a Human Rights Defender, Journalist and an Activist. Find out more about Ariyana by visiting her Blog (where this article originated) at Ambassador Love.

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

EVIDENCE OF GENOCIDE: The Mask Psyop

Repost from Aryana Love at The Liberty Beacon

Here’s a compilation of evidence from peer-reviewed scientific journals, medical experts and media explicitly proving that masks are not only ineffective at containing the spread of infectious diseases, viruses and influenza but masks are also extremely dangerous to health.

Masks Do Not Work. There is no such study that has proven the efficacy of masks in stopping viral or influenza infectious spread. THERE ARE NO EXCEPTIONS. Large meta-analyses, and all the RCT, prove that there is no such relative benefit. Masks and respirators do not work. Mandating masks constitutes Crime Against Humanity and child abuse.

Timeline 2020

February 

Here is a WILEY study released in February: “Effectiveness of N95 respirators versus surgical masks against influenza: A systematic review and meta-analysis.”

CONCLUSION: “A total of six RCTs involving 9,171 participants were included. There were no statistically significant differences in preventing laboratory-confirmed influenza, laboratory-confirmed respiratory viral infections, laboratory-confirmed respiratory infection, and influenza-like illness using N95 respirators and surgical Masks. Meta-analysis indicated a protective effect of N95 respirators against laboratory-confirmed bacterial colonization (RR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.43-0.78). The use of N95 respirators compared with surgical masks is not associated with a lower risk of laboratory-confirmed influenza.”

Essentially, neither N95 or surgical masks are effective in protecting against influenza. — See link here.

March

The Independent published a story where one of England’s most senior doctors warned that members of the public could be putting themselves more at risk from contracting coronavirus by wearing face masks: “Coronavirus: Face masks could increase risk of infection, medical chief warns”— See link here.

April

Denis G. Rancourt, PhD Researcher for Ontario Civil Liberties Associationproduced an abstract summary providing a list of Medical Literature proving that Masks and respirators do not work: “Masks Don’t Work A review of science relevant to COVID-19 social policy” — See link here.

Dr Rashid Buttar was one of the very first medical experts to speak up with medical facts in the face of a sea of mainstream media disinformation. I highly recommend watching this London Reel interview with Dr Rashid Buttar where he explains in depthwhat Coronavirus is based on sound science without a political agenda. Dr Buttar also dives into the harms of mask-wearing: “THE CORONAVIRUS AGENDA – WHAT THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA DON’T WANT YOU TO KNOW” — See video here.

May

The Event 201 Coronavirus live simulation exercise to prepare public and private leaders of a pandemic response, was launched in October of 2019. We have been in a training exercise orchestrated by the elites. — See link here.

Governments were clear from the start of this training exercise that nobody should be wearing a mask but by June, they did an about face. — See video here.

Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC)openly states on its website that there is little evidence that wearing a mask will protect you when you are healthy. — See link here.

CDC released a report in May saying that wearing face masks, washing hands and sanitizing surfaces are useless in preventing one’s susceptibility to Covid19 — See link here.

New England Journal of Medicine released a peer-reviewed study: “Universal Masking in Hospitals in the Covid-19 Era”.

CONCLUSION: “We know that wearing a mask outside health care facilities offers little, if any, protection from infection.” — See link here.

In May 2020, Technocracy News and Trends published: “Blaylock: Face Masks Pose Serious Risks To The Healthy”. Dr. Russell Blaylock warns that not only do face masks fail to protect the healthy from getting sick, but they also create serious health risks to the wearer. The bottom line is that if you are not sick, you should not wear a face mask:

“It gets even more frightening. Newer evidence suggests that in some cases the virus can enter the brain. In most instances it enters the brain by way of the olfactory nerves (smell nerves), which connect directly with the area of the brain dealing with recent memory and memory consolidation. By wearing a mask, the exhaled viruses will not be able to escape and will concentrate in the nasal passages, enter the olfactory nerves and travel into the brain.” — See article here.

“By wearing a mask, the exhaled viruses will not be able to escape & will concentrate in the nasal passages, enter the olfactory nerves & travel into the brain… the bulk of the evidence points toward hypoxia and/or hypercapnia as the cause. That is, a reduction in blood oxygenation (hypoxia) or an elevation in blood C02 (hypercapnia).”

“It is known that the N95 mask, if worn for hours, can reduce blood oxygenation as much as 20%, which can lead to a loss of consciousness, as happened to the hapless fellow driving around alone in his car wearing an N95 mask, causing him to pass out, and to crash his car and sustain injuries. I am sure that we have several cases of elderly individuals or any person with poor lung function passing out, hitting their head. This, of course, can lead to death.”

“The importance of these findings is that a drop in oxygen levels (hypoxia) is associated with an impairment in immunity. Studies have shown that hypoxia can inhibit the type of main immune cells used to fight viral infections called the CD4+ T-lymphocyte. This occurs because the hypoxia increases the level of a compound called hypoxia-inducible factor-1 (HIF-1), which inhibits T-lymphocytes and stimulates a powerful immune inhibitor cell called the Tregs. This sets the stage for contracting any infection, including COVID-19 and making the consequences of that infection much graver. In essence, your mask may very well put you at an increased risk of infections and if so, having a much worse outcome.”

Also in May, Global Research emphasized in that masks lead to under-oxygenation, a forerunner to fatigue, weakness and serious diseases like cancer. The decrease of oxygen in one’s body always increases acidity. Cancer thrives in acidic conditions: “Unmasking the Truth: Studies Show Dehumanizing Masks Weaken You and Don’t Protect You” — See link here.

June

In June, River Cities Reader‘s provides a vital list of peer-reviewed studies and Medical Literature on masks, providing key anchor points to the extensive scientific literature that establishes that wearing surgical masks and respirators (e.g., “N95”) does not reduce the risk of contracting a verified illness: “Masks Don’t Work: A Review of Science Relevant to COVID-19 Social Policy” — See link here.

July

A month later, CNN released this article: “Coronavirus pandemic could cause wave of brain damage, scientists warn” — See link here.

Dr. Rashid Buttar was among the first medical experts to speak out against masks and he has been tyrannically censored by big tech social media platforms. He explains that the pores of the fibers of masks are so much bigger than the particles people are fearfully trying to keep out.

Dr Buttar: Masks Are a SCAM & Tyrannical Abuse

https://www.bitchute.com/embed/AEPXedXb72ym/

Dr. Buttar explains that masks are a scam and tyrannical abuse. If anybody tells you to wear a face mask all you have to say is that you have a medical exemption. If they ask you what your medical condition is they are violating your HIPAA rights and your American Disability Rights if you are in the US. Nobody has the right to ask you what is your medical condition or force you to wear a mask. Nobody.

August

Global Research reveals masks are conditioning people to accept mandatory vaccinations: “Masks – psychological operation towards mandatory vaccines”— See link here.

September

Bigtree introduced his 11-year old son who wore an N95 mask and tested the carbon dioxide (CO2) levels inside of it that can cause toxicity or oxygen deprivation when CO2 rises to 5000 ppm, which is the limit for daily workplace exposures, according to OSHA. The meter registered more than 10,000 ppm and stopped, all within a few seconds. A paper mask and a bandana both registered over 9000 ppm, and a plastic face shield registered at 1500 ppm. Indoor CO2 air levels should be no higher than 1100 ppm inside of classrooms.https://d-4072647693542875860.ampproject.net/2011252111003/frame.html

Global Research further stated a case that mandated or coerced mask wearing by governments is psychological terrorism aka warfare: “COVID-19: Continuous Wearing of Mask Aggravates Risk of Infection. “Psychological Terrorism”?” — See linkhere.

October

Dr Buttar gave another urgent warning in a TV interview: “Expect Mass Deaths From Coronavirus Vaccines – Dr Rashid Buttar on Second Wave” — See video here.

Global Research released “COVID-19 Masks Are a Crime Against Humanity and Child Abuse” — See link here.

November

World Doctors Alliance confirmed that two 14-year-old boys from Germany died due to wearing masks. Mainstream media censored it. Ireland’s chief Virologist, Dollores Cahill, says that after one minute of wearing a mask you are in a toxic environment. An employer who forces you to wear a mask is liable for any fatalities from masks which are causing serious harm to people. — See link here.

OffGaurdian published this: “Face Masks: A Danger to Our Planet, Our Children & Ourselves” — See link here.

The Last American Vagabond did an excellent news report: “Health Risks of Masks” — See link here.

In November a medical Doctor in the US slammed masks.

Medical Doctor: Truth About Masks And Their Futility

https://www.bitchute.com/embed/77yae4jeu3So/

December

Dr Merritt has researched Bioweapons and face masks and says masks don’t work. Professionals pushing masks are either being “paid or played”. — See video here.

Cancer and Masks

In Highwire’s: “MASK WHISTLEBLOWERS TELL ALL”, government trained OSHA mask experts Tammy Clark & Kristen Meghan joined Del in-studio to break down vital info on masks, PPE, and their role in Covid-19 prevention. They reveal that mask wearing can lead to heart attacks and cancer. Every adult on this planet wearing a mask needs to hear this riveting discussion. — See link here.

If work requires you to wear a face mask, OSHA requires that your employer verifies you are receiving a minimum of 19.5% oxygen level by law! Sustained stress levels during unlawful Lockdown and by the wearing of masks compromise the human immune system. Cortisone is released by the immune system in response to stress, suppressing & weakening your Immune System. This is corporate manslaughter by governments and intentional genocide.

Dr. Otto Warburg has also exposed these truths about cancer:

“All normal cells have an absolute requirement for Oxygen, but cancer cells can live without Oxygen – a rule without exception… Deprive a cell 35% of its Oxygen for 48 hours and it may become cancerous.”

The typical blue mask most people are wearing, contains Teflon and other chemicals that cause cancer. Masks are “sterilized” with Ethylene Oxide — a knowncarcinogen. Many teachers in various school boards have been experiencing significant symptoms as a direct result of the effects of this chemical. 2. The masks contain (not sprayed with) PTFE which makes up Teflon along with other chemicals that also cause cancer. — See link here.

Lockdowns

US Senator Rand Paul says Lockdowns are unlawful. Rand Paul: No Scientific Evidence ‘Tyrannical’ Lockdowns Work — See link here.

Know Your Rights

In November David Kurten published a Notice of Liability for Schools, drafted by Legal Counsel for the World Freedom Alliance in the UK with regard to mask-wearing. This document will put your schools on notice for personal liability for associated risks. — See link here.

History repeats – “Spanish Flu”

Autopsy reports from the historic pandemic of 1918 revealed that mandated masks killed an estimated 30 million people. So it was not the “flu” that killed them at all during the “Spanish Flu”.

In a paper co-authored by Anthony Fauci in the Journal of Infectious Diseases in 2008 it reveals that Mr Fauci knew masks killed millions of people in the 1918 “pandemic.” Autopsy reports exposed secondary bacterial pneumonia caused by common upper respiratory-tract bacteria as the main cause of death, not the “flu”. Despite this, Mr Fauci still coercively mandated masks on the American people knowing they would get sick from the masks and they are. — See link here.

I recommend reading “Vaccines Caused 1918 “Spanish Flu” Which Killed Millions” since historic genocides are now repeating” — See link here.

I also recommend watching “Historic Pandemic” — See video here.

Finally, I will leave you with this explosive video compilation of censored medical experts warning to humanity released in December: “Ask The Experts – Doctors and Scientist speak up about the hoax of COVID-19 and the danger of VAX!” — See video here.

••••

About the Author: Ariyana Love is a Goodwill Ambassador to Palestine (ICSPR), Chairwoman of an international foundation, a Human Rights Defender, Journalist and an Activist. Find out more about Ariyana by visiting her Blog (where this article originated) at Ambassador Love.

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

COVID-1984 AND THE AGENDAS TO COME WITH JAMES PERLOFF

Interview by Spiro Skouras

As we approach the final days of 2020, Spiro is joined by author, journalist and recently retired registered nurse, James Perloff, to reflect on what is widely considered to be the wildest and worst year perhaps in our lifetimes.

The media and the governments around the world would like us to believe this is all by chance and we must blindly follow their mandates and restrictions in order to mitigate this crisis.

Spiro and Perloff delve beyond the surface of this crisis to explore potential motives behind what appears to be a pre planned agenda attached to the current crisis in order to facilitate the most significant transition in human history.

James Perloff shares information from his new book titled ‘COVID-19 and the Agendas to Come, Red-Pilled’ which reveals what the social engineers have in store for the future of humanity.

James Peloff Website 
Jamesperloff.com

James Perloff’s new book
https://jamesperloff.com/covid-19-and-the-agendas-to-come-red-pilled/

New WHO Herd Immunity Definition
https://www.who.int/news-room/q-a-detail/coronavirus-disease-covid-19-serology

Original WHO Herd Immunity Definition 
https://web.archive.org/web/20201101161006/https://www.who.int/news-room/q-a-detail/coronavirus-disease-covid-19-serology

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

NIH and Moderna Phase 1 Clinical Trial

Repost from  The Highwire with Del Bigtree

After months of objections, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and Moderna have capitulated and provided ICAN a copy of their internal 322-page Safety Summary Report for the Phase I trial of their COVID-19 vaccine (mRNA-1273). A full copy of this report is available below and this is the first time it is being made available to the public.

On May 18, 2020, Moderna issued a press release claiming the data from its Phase I trial “substantiate our belief that mRNA-1273 has the potential to prevent COVID-19 disease.” Since this trial was actually conducted by the NIH, ICAN submitted a FOIA request on May 22, 2020 to NIH for: “All safety and efficacy data and information regarding mRNA-1273, including from the Phase I clinical trial of this experimental vaccine conducted by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.” ICAN requested that NIH grant expedited processing for this request. 

On June 8, 2020, NIH recognized the “compelling need” to expeditiously release to the public the information ICAN sought by granting its request for expedited processing. But then NIH failed to produce anything. Therefore, ICAN sued the NIH on August 13, 2020 in federal court to force NIH to release this data. NIH then finally sent a “final response” to ICAN stating: “The safety data for this study comprises 1,093 pages. I have determined to withhold those records in their entirety pursuant to [exemptions that] protect information that constitutes trade secret information and information that is confidential and commercial or financial in nature.” 

ICAN did not accept this objection and its attorneys, led by Aaron Siri, informed the court that we would argue for the documents via briefs to the court. NIH’s opening brief – explaining why it should not produce this data – was set to be due to the Court on October 30, 2020. Eight days before that due date, on October 22, 2020, NIH and Moderna abruptly reversed their position and advised that they would produce all of the data. 

On October 29, 2020, ICAN received the first 332 of 1,093 pages — the remainder of which will be produced shortly. It can be downloaded here. ICAN and its subscribers are the first people in the world, outside of NIH and Moderna, to actually see this data. We will be carefully studying all of the disclosed data but ICAN wanted to widely disseminate it immediately so that others have the opportunity to do the same.  

Despite only receiving a portion of the data, what ICAN has already received provides important information for the public to know in evaluating Moderna’s vaccine. For example, the documents ICAN received reveal that approximately 70% of participants reported unsolicited adverse events, many of which are extremely concerning.  

Just as the pharmaceutical companies will never rest when it comes to promoting and selling their vaccine products, we will never rest in exposing the truth regarding these products or in demanding full transparency and full informed consent for any and all vaccines.

Fair Use: In some instances, we include someone else’s footage that is covered in Fair Use for Documentary and Educational purposes with the intention of driving commentary and allowing freedom of speech.

DEATH DURING COVID VACCINE TRIAL

Repost from The Highwire with Del Bigtree

Over the past month, Covid-19 vaccine trials have repeatedly paused as participants continue to report adverse events, but a recent event revealed a death in AstraZeneca’s trial currently underway in Brazil. With few details being made available to the public, what do you need to know about this latest setback in the race to develop a #Covid19 vaccine? Take a look.

#Placebo #COVID19VAX #TrialDeath #Health #DelBigtree #Astrazeneca #TheHighWire

Death by vaccine -> we do “independent investigation” -> we can’t say anything because of confidentiality, it’s secret -> we continue the trials -> vaccine is again safe and effective!!!

CDC Data PROVES that There Was NEVER a Pandemic repost from Wake the Sheople

***Opinions from the NET***

They ALWAYS control both sides of a conflict, ESPECIALLY one as large as the dictator of America (yes, presidents have been dictators for a very long time now). https://www.bitchute.com/video/6qhO66iy1rL9/ JFK signed the disarmament treaty into law, which was going along with the PLAN. I’m assuming he didn’t know that it included the disarmament of the entire USA, including the people. When he found out (or had a change of heart) he made a speech about secret societies. It was then that he would meet his fate. If Trump really was standing against them, do you really think they couldn’t stop it? Trump is rich, but the “rulers behind the thrones of men” have unlimited funds to draw from because they create money from thin air.

I knew, from the beginning, that this whole thing was either a scam, 5G, or a biological weapon. I now know, with certainty, that it was a scam. The biggest proofs are: 1. Empty hospitals. 2. My own personal experience, as I stopped getting the flu, about 20 years ago, when I stopped getting the flu shot. 3. The CDC data… However, even if they did skew the data (which I had expected), it would make no difference to me, as the first two proofs far outweigh ANY government agency, large corporation, or a small company with a conflict of interest (like how hospitals get 13,000 for every COVID patient).

The CDC also came clean about the FRAUDULENT CONvid-1984 death counts, as recently described in detail by Dr. Andrew Kaufman (also see my comment (click “show more”) on Illinois Director of Health, back on April 19th, explaining in CRYSTAL CLEAR detail how they have been CONNING us on the death stats): Dr Kaufman & CDC confirm OBVIOUS (Birx!): CONvid-1984 death count is BIG FAT LIE, ergo, NO pandemic! https://www.bitchute.com/video/FGCjXTR7kUO2/

They changed the meaning of the word “pandemic” in order to do what they are doing. Like blacks law dictionary they come up with new editions when they change the terms to suit their system. In layman’s terms; shifting the goalposts.

Pandemic meaning as defined in 2020: an outbreak of a disease that occurs over a wide geographic area (such as multiple countries or continents) and typically affects a significant proportion of the population: a pandemic outbreak of a disease.

ES…but, to the SHEOPLE, there is a PANDEMIC…. Honestly, I’m SHOCKED that the CDC isn’t “fudging” the numbers. It is yet another indication of how WELL they know the STUPIDITY of the sheople…

Fair Use: In some instances, we include someone else’s footage that is covered in Fair Use for Documentary and Educational purposes with the intention of driving commentary and allowing freedom of speech.

Public Health England – Covid is a FLU

After October 2020, the Public Heantlh England in UK announced will be treating COVID-19 as a seasonal FLU. They are mixing it with flu…which it is.

Public Health England week 40 PDF downloads says if I read it correctly they are going to add Covid-19 data to FLU data.

Since the 1st wave did not kill us all and they assigned everyone dying from other comorbidity to Covid, their plan for the second wave is to get those annual sick and ill people from the FLU into the COVID column and justify there is a second outbreak. What a clear are these criminals who continue wit the hoax.

For those of us ‘awaken’ keep theming ourselves when the sheeples will wake up from their sleep. It appears most people are in the state of comma. They cannot comprehend what has happened and who is behind the destruction of millions of life for their own benefits. This virus is a political virus. I have said it back in March and I will continue to sustain my believe as recent documents and data have probe me right.

Meanwhile, in the USA, CDCs /FDA own documents on page 39…admitted there is No Covid…https://www.lewrockwell.com/2020/10/jon-rappoport/what-could-they-put-in-the-covid-vaccine/

The rich has gotten richer. The middle class and the small businesses will be destroyed making it easy to control through big conglomerates.

The end goal ? The new world order!

Masks Don’t Work: A Review of Science Relevant to COVID-19 Social Policy

By Denis G. Rancourt, PhD

Masks and respirators do not work.

There have been extensive randomized controlled trial (RCT) studies, and metaanalysis reviews of RCT studies, which all show that masks and respirators do not work to prevent respiratory influenza-like illnesses, or respiratory illnesses believed to be transmitted by droplets and aerosol particles.

Furthermore, the relevant known physics and biology, which I review, are such that masks and respirators should not work. It would be a paradox if masks and respirators worked, given what we know about viral respiratory diseases: The main transmission path is
long-residence-time aerosol particles (< 2.5 -m), which are too fine to be blocked, and the minimum-infective dose is smaller than one aerosol particle.

The present paper about masks illustrates the degree to which governments, the mainstream media, and institutional propagandists can decide to operate in a science vacuum or select only incomplete science that serves their interests. Such recklessness is also certainly the case with the current global lockdown of over 1 billion people, an unprecedented experiment
in medical and political history.

Review of the Medical Literature

Here are key anchor points to the extensive scientific literature that establishes that wearingsurgical masks and respirators (e.g., “N95”) does not reduce the risk of contracting a verified illness:
Jacobs, J. L. et al. (2009) “Use of surgical face masks to reduce the incidence of the common cold among health care workers in Japan: A randomized controlled trial,” American Journal of Infection Control, Volume 37, Issue 5, 417 – 419.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19216002
N95-masked health-care workers (HCW) were significantly more likely to experience headaches. Face mask use in HCW was not demonstrated to provide benefit in terms of cold symptoms or getting colds.
Cowling, B. et al. (2010) “Face masks to prevent transmission of influenza virus: A systematic
review,” Epidemiology and Infection, 138(4), 449-456.
https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/epidemiology-and-infection/article/face-masks-toprevent-transmission-of-influenza-virus-a-systematic-review/
64D368496EBDE0AFCC6639CCC9D8BC05
None of the studies reviewed showed a benefit from wearing a mask, in either HCW or
community members in households (H). See summary Tables 1 and 2 therein.
bin-Reza et al. (2012) “The use of masks and respirators to prevent transmission of influenza:
a systematic review of the scientific evidence,” Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses 6(4),
257–267. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/j.1750-2659.2011.00307.x

“There were 17 eligible studies. … None of the studies established a conclusive relationship
between mask/respirator use and protection against influenza infection.”
Smith, J.D. et al. (2016) “Effectiveness of N95 respirators versus surgical masks in protecting
health care workers from acute respiratory infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis,”
CMAJ Mar 2016 https://www.cmaj.ca/content/188/8/567

“We identified six clinical studies … . In the meta-analysis of the clinical studies, we found no
significant difference between N95 respirators and surgical masks in associated risk of (a)
laboratory-confirmed respiratory infection, (b) influenza-like illness, or (c) reported work-place
absenteeism.”
Offeddu, V. et al. (2017) “Effectiveness of Masks and Respirators Against Respiratory
Infections in Healthcare Workers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis,” Clinical Infectious
Diseases, Volume 65, Issue 11, 1 December 2017, Pages 1934–1942,
https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/65/11/1934/4068747

“Self-reported assessment of clinical outcomes was prone to bias. Evidence of a protective
effect of masks or respirators against verified respiratory infection (VRI) was not statistically
significant”; as per Fig. 2c therein:Radonovich, L.J. et al. (2019) “N95 Respirators vs Medical
Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Care Personnel: A Randomized Clinical Trial,”
JAMA. 2019; 322(9): 824–833.
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2749214

“Among 2862 randomized participants, 2371 completed the study and accounted for 5180
HCW-seasons. … Among outpatient health care personnel, N95 respirators vs medical masks
as worn by participants in this trial resulted in no significant difference in the incidence of
laboratory-confirmed influenza.”
Long, Y. et al. (2020) “Effectiveness of N95 respirators versus surgical masks against
influenza: A systematic review and meta-analysis,” J Evid Based Med. 2020; 1- 9.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jebm.12381

“A total of six RCTs involving 9,171 participants were included. There were no statistically
significant differences in preventing laboratory-confirmed influenza, laboratory-confirmed
respiratory viral infections, laboratory-confirmed respiratory infection, and influenza-like illness
using N95 respirators and surgical masks. Meta-analysis indicated a protective effect of N95
respirators against laboratory-confirmed bacterial colonization (RR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.43-0.78).

The use of N95 respirators compared with surgical masks is not associated with a lower risk
of laboratory-confirmed influenza.”
Conclusion Regarding That Masks Do Not Work
No RCT study with verified outcome shows a benefit for HCW or community members in
households to wearing a mask or respirator. There is no such study. There are no exceptions.
Likewise, no study exists that shows a benefit from a broad policy to wear masks in public
Furthermore, if there were any benefit to wearing a mask, because of the blocking power
against droplets and aerosol particles, then there should be more benefit from wearing a
respirator (N95) compared to a surgical mask, yet several large meta-analyses, and all the
RCT, prove that there is no such relative benefit.Masks and respirators do not work.
Precautionary Principle Turned on Its Head with Masks
In light of the medical research, therefore, it is difficult to understand why public-health
authorities are not consistently adamant about this established scientific result, since the
distributed psychological, economic, and environmental harm from a broad recommendation
to wear masks is significant, not to mention the unknown potential harm from concentration
and distribution of pathogens on and from used masks. In this case, public authorities would
be turning the precautionary principle on its head (see below).
Physics and Biology of Viral Respiratory Disease and of Why Masks Do
Not Work

In order to understand why masks cannot possibly work, we must review established
knowledge about viral respiratory diseases, the mechanism of seasonal variation of excess
deaths from pneumonia and influenza, the aerosol mechanism of infectious disease
transmission, the physics and chemistry of aerosols, and the mechanism of the so-called
minimum-infective-dose.

In addition to pandemics that can occur anytime, in the temperate latitudes there is an extra
burden of respiratory-disease mortality that is seasonal, and that is caused by viruses. For
example, see the review of influenza by Paules and Subbarao (2017). This has been known
for a long time, and the seasonal pattern is exceedingly regular. (Publisher’s note: All links to
source references to studies here forward are found at the end of this article.)

For example, see Figure 1 of Viboud (2010), which has “Weekly time series of the ratio of
deaths from pneumonia and influenza to all deaths, based on the 122 cities surveillance in the
US (blue line). The red line represents the expected baseline ratio in the absence of influenza
activity,” here:The seasonality of the phenomenon was largely not understood until a decade
ago. Until recently, it was debated whether the pattern arose primarily because of seasonal
change in virulence of the pathogens, or because of seasonal change in susceptibility of the
host (such as from dry air causing tissue irritation, or diminished daylight causing vitamin
deficiency or hormonal stress). For example, see Dowell (2001).

In a landmark study, Shaman et al. (2010) showed that the seasonal pattern of extra
respiratory-disease mortality can be explained quantitatively on the sole basis of absolute
humidity, and its direct controlling impact on transmission of airborne pathogens.
Lowen et al. (2007) demonstrated the phenomenon of humidity-dependent airborne-virus
virulence in actual disease transmission between guinea pigs, and discussed potential
underlying mechanisms for the measured controlling effect of humidity.
The underlying mechanism is that the pathogen-laden aerosol particles or droplets are
neutralized within a half-life that monotonically and significantly decreases with increasing
ambient humidity. This is based on the seminal work of Harper (1961). Harper experimentally

showed that viral-pathogen-carrying droplets were inactivated within shorter and shorter
times, as ambient humidity was increased.Harper argued that the viruses themselves were
made inoperative by the humidity (“viable decay”), however, he admitted that the effect could
be from humidity-enhanced physical removal or sedimentation of the droplets (“physical
loss”): “Aerosol viabilities reported in this paper are based on the ratio of virus titre to
radioactive count in suspension and cloud samples, and can be criticized on the ground that
test and tracer materials were not physically identical.”
The latter (“physical loss”) seems more plausible to me, since humidity would have a
universal physical effect of causing particle/droplet growth and sedimentation, and all tested
viral pathogens have essentially the same humidity-driven “decay.” Furthermore, it is difficult
to understand how a virion (of all virus types) in a droplet would be molecularly or structurally
attacked or damaged by an increase in ambient humidity. A “virion” is the complete, ineffective
form of a virus outside a host cell, with a core of RNA or DNA and a capsid. The actual
mechanism of such humidity-driven intra-droplet “viable decay” of a virion has not been
explained or studied.
In any case, the explanation and model of Shaman et al. (2010) is not dependent on the
particular mechanism of the humidity-driven decay of virions in aerosol/droplets. Shaman’s
quantitatively demonstrated model of seasonal regional viral epidemiology is valid for either
mechanism (or combination of mechanisms), whether “viable decay” or “physical loss.”
The breakthrough achieved by Shaman et al. is not merely some academic point. Rather, it
has profound health-policy implications, which have been entirely ignored or overlooked in the
current coronavirus pandemic.
In particular, Shaman’s work necessarily implies that, rather than being a fixed number
(dependent solely on the spatial-temporal structure of social interactions in a completely
susceptible population, and on the viral strain), the epidemic’s basic reproduction number
(R0) is highly or predominantly dependent on ambient absolute humidity.

For a definition of R0, see HealthKnowlege-UK (2020): R0 is “the average number of
secondary infections produced by a typical case of an infection in a population where
everyone is susceptible.” The average R0 for influenza is said to be 1.28 (1.19–1.37); see the
comprehensive review by Biggerstaff et al. (2014).
In fact, Shaman et al. showed that R0 must be understood to seasonally vary between humidsummer values of just larger than “1” and dry-winter values typically as large as “4” (for
example, see their Table 2). In other words, the seasonal infectious viral respiratory diseases
that plague temperate latitudes every year go from being intrinsically mildly contagious to
virulently contagious, due simply to the bio-physical mode of transmission controlled by
atmospheric humidity, irrespective of any other consideration.

Therefore, all the epidemiological mathematical modeling of the benefits of mediating policies
(such as social distancing), which assumes humidity-independent R0 values, has a large
likelihood of being of little value, on this basis alone. For studies about modeling and
regarding mediation effects on the effective reproduction number, see Coburn (2009) and
Tracht (2010)

 

To put it simply, the “second wave” of an epidemic is not a consequence of human sin
regarding mask wearing and hand shaking. Rather, the “second wave” is an inescapable
consequence of an air-dryness-driven many-fold increase in disease contagiousness, in a
population that has not yet attained immunity.
If my view of the mechanism is correct (i.e., “physical loss”), then Shaman’s work further
necessarily implies that the dryness-driven high transmissibility (large R0) arises from small
aerosol particles fluidly suspended in the air; as opposed to large droplets that are quickly
gravitationally removed from the air.

Such small aerosol particles fluidly suspended in air, of biological origin, are of every variety
and are everywhere, including down to virion-sizes (Despres, 2012). It is not entirely unlikely
that viruses can thereby be physically transported over inter-continental distances (e.g.,
Hammond, 1989).

More to the point, indoor airborne virus concentrations have been shown to exist (in day-care
facilities, health centers, and on-board airplanes) primarily as aerosol particles of diameters
smaller than 2.5 -m, such as in the work of Yang et al. (2011):
“Half of the 16 samples were positive, and their total virus −3 concentrations ranged from
5800 to 37 000 genome copies m . On average, 64 per cent of the viral genome copies were
associated with fine particles smaller than 2.5 -m, which can remain suspended for hours.
Modeling of virus concentrations indoors suggested a source strength of 1.6 ± 1.2 × 105
genome copies m−3 air h−1 and a deposition flux onto surfaces of 13 ± 7 genome copies
m−2 h−1 by Brownian motion. Over one hour, the inhalation dose was estimated to be 30 ±
18 median tissue culture infectious dose (TCID50), adequate to induce infection. These
results provide quantitative support for the idea that the aerosol route could be an important
mode of influenza transmission.”
Such small particles (< 2.5 -m) are part of air fluidity, are not subject to gravitational
sedimentation, and would not be stopped by long-range inertial impact. This means that the
slightest (even momentary) facial misfit of a mask or respirator renders the design filtration
norm of the mask or respirator entirely irrelevant. In any case, the filtration material itself of
N95 (average pore size ~0.3−0.5 -m) does not block virion penetration, not to mention
surgical masks. For example, see Balazy et al. (2006).
Mask stoppage efficiency and host inhalation are only half of the equation, however, because
the minimal ineffective dose (MID) must also be considered. For example, if a large number of
pathogen-laden particles must be delivered to the lung within a certain time for the illness to
take hold, then partial blocking by any mask or cloth can be enough to make a significant
difference.

On the other hand, if the MID is amply surpassed by the virions carried in a single aerosol
particle able to evade mask-capture, then the mask is of no practical utility, which is the
case.Yezli and Otter (2011), in their review of the MID, point out relevant features:
1. Most respiratory viruses are as infective in humans as in tissue culture having optimal
laboratory susceptibility

2. It is believed that a single virion can be enough to induce illness in the host
3. The 50-percent probability MID (“TCID50”) has variably been found to be in the range
100−1000 virions
4. There are typically 10 to 3rd power − 10 to 7th power virions per aerolized influenza
droplet with diameter 1 -m − 10 -m
5. The 50-percent probability MID easily fits into a single (one) aerolized droplet
6. For further background:
7. A classic description of dose-response assessment is provided by Haas (1993).
8. Zwart et al. (2009) provided the first laboratory proof, in a virus-insect system, that the
action of a single virion can be sufficient to cause disease.
9. Baccam et al. (2006) calculated from empirical data that, with influenza A in humans,“we
estimate that after a delay of ~6 h, infected cells begin producing influenza virus and continue
to do so for ~5 h. The average lifetime of infected cells is ~11 h, and the half-life of free
infectious virus is ~3 h. We calculated the [in-body] basic reproductive number, R0, which
indicated that a single infected cell could produce ~22 new productive infections.”
10. Brooke et al. (2013) showed that, contrary to prior modeling assumptions, although not all
influenza-A-infected cells in the human body produce infectious progeny (virions),
nonetheless, 90 percent of infected cell are significantly impacted, rather than simply
surviving unharmed.
All of this to say that: if anything gets through (and it always does, irrespective of the mask),
then you are going to be infected. Masks cannot possibly work. It is not surprising, therefore,
that no bias-free study has ever found a benefit from wearing a mask or respirator in this
application.
Therefore, the studies that show partial stopping power of masks, or that show that masks
can capture many large droplets produced by a sneezing or coughing mask-wearer, in light of
the above-described features of the problem, are irrelevant. For example, such studies as
these: Leung (2020), Davies (2013), Lai (2012), and Sande (2008).
Why There Can Never Be an Empirical Test of a Nation-Wide Mask-Wearing Policy
As mentioned above, no study exists that shows a benefit from a broad policy to wear masks
in public. There is good reason for this. It would be impossible to obtain unambiguous and
bias-free results [because]:
1. Any benefit from mask-wearing would have to be a small effect, since undetected in
controlled experiments, which would be swamped by the larger effects, notably the large
effect from changing atmospheric humidity.
2. Mask compliance and mask adjustment habits would be unknown.
3. Mask-wearing is associated (correlated) with several other health behaviors; see Wada
(2012).
4. The results would not be transferable, because of differing cultural habits.

5. Compliance is achieved by fear, and individuals can habituate to fear-based propaganda,
and can have disparate basic responses.
6. Monitoring and compliance measurement are near-impossible, and subject to large errors.
7. Self-reporting (such as in surveys) is notoriously biased, because individuals have the selfinterested belief that their efforts are useful.
8. Progression of the epidemic is not verified with reliable tests on large population samples,
and generally relies on non-representative hospital visits or
admissions.
9. Several different pathogens (viruses and strains of viruses) causing respiratory illness
generally act together, in the same population and/or in individuals, and are not resolved,
while having different epidemiological characteristics.
Unknown Aspects of Mask Wearing
Many potential harms may arise from broad public policies to wear masks, and the following
unanswered questions arise:
1. Do used and loaded masks become sources of enhanced transmission, for the wearer and
others?
2. Do masks become collectors and retainers of pathogens that the mask wearer would
otherwise avoid when breathing without a mask?
3. Are large droplets captured by a mask atomized or aerolized into breathable components?
Can virions escape an evaporating droplet stuck to a mask fiber?
4. What are the dangers of bacterial growth on a used and loaded mask?
5. How do pathogen-laden droplets interact with environmental dust and aerosols captured
on the mask?
6. What are long-term health effects on HCW, such as headaches, arising from impeded
breathing?
7. Are there negative social consequences to a masked society?
8. Are there negative psychological consequences to wearing a mask, as a fear-based
behavioral modification?
9. What are the environmental consequences of mask manufacturing and disposal?
10.Do the masks shed fibers or substances that are harmful when inhaled?

Conclusion
By making mask-wearing recommendations and policies for the general public, or by
expressly condoning the practice, governments have both ignored the scientific evidence and
done the opposite of following the precautionary principle. In an absence of knowledge,
governments should not make policies that have a hypothetical potential to cause harm. The
government has an onus barrier before it instigates a broad social-engineering intervention, or
allows corporations to exploit fear-based sentiments.

Furthermore, individuals should know that there is no known benefit arising from
wearing a mask in a viral respiratory illness epidemic, and that scientific studies have shown
that any benefit must be residually small, compared to other and determinative factors.
Otherwise, what is the point of publicly funded science?

The present paper about masks illustrates the degree to which governments, the
mainstream media, and institutional propagandists can decide to operate in a science
vacuum, or select only incomplete science that serves their interests. Such recklessness is
also certainly the case with the current global lockdown of over 1 billion people, an
unprecedented experiment in medical and political history.

Denis G. Rancourt is a researcher at the Ontario Civil Liberties Association (OCLA.ca) and is
formerly a tenured professor at the University of Ottawa, Canada. This paper was originally
published at Rancourt’s account on ResearchGate.net.

As of June 5, 2020, this paper was
removed from his profile by its administrators at Rese archgate.net/profile/D_Rancourt . At
Rancourt’s blog ActivistTeacher . blogspot.com , he recounts the notification and responses
he received from ResearchGate.net and states, “This is censorship of my scientific work like I
have never experienced before.”

The original April 2020 white paper in .pdf format is available here, complete with
charts that have not been reprinted in the Reader print or web versions.

Fair Use: In some instances, we include someone else’s footage that is covered in Fair Use for Documentary and Educational purposes with the intention of driving commentary and allowing freedom of speech.

Lies, Lies and more Lies – Quack Hack

A voluntary vaccination that is required to travel, go to school, or even just leave your home is not actually “voluntary” at all, especially, when many of the most advanced COVID-19 vaccines include aborted fetal cell lines.

Humanity Is Being Deceived. Viruses, Natural or Man-Made can be controlled in the Cells with Angstrom Mineral Solution of Copper and in the Bloodstream with Colloidal Silver.

Angstrom is the size of the minerals which can enter the cells & Colloidal Minerals are too large to enter the cells, but kill viruses & diseases in the bloodstream. Humanity is led to believe there is no Hope or Cure, when there is Hope & Natural Cures, Not Profitable To The Medical Pharmaceuticals Industries.

COVID-19 like most Life-Threatening Diseases is “ANAEROBIC”, which can be Effectively Killed With “Ozone” & other Oxygen Therapies, which are Suppressed by the FDA, AMA, Medical/Pharmaceuticals Industries.

Newsweek 06/29/2020 suggested a 50% False Positive Rate for COVID-19 TESTS. This is the Science they want you to Trust & Believe In.

Read, This Is A Bio-Attack Alert, by Dr Robert B Strecker.

Look Up: 1. Angstrom Mineral Solution of Copper 2. Colloidal Silver 3. Oxygen Therapies 4. Ozone Generators 5. Essential Oils 6. Food Grade Hydrogen Peroxide 7. Dr Robert B Strecker on Archive dot org. 8.Murder By Injection, Eustace Mullins

Vaccine advocates use deceptive language saying the injections will be “voluntary,” but that is likely only if you volunteer to stay home, give up grocery shopping, attending school, going to work, eating in restaurants, or traveling.

During the last three months, more than 105,000,000 posts have been deleted or grayed-out that were discussing COVID-19. To put this in perspective, that’s almost 1.2 million posts censored every day—or 48,000 posts about COVID-19 censored EVERY HOUR of the day!

So, despite now-overwhelming medical evidence, FB censors think they know best what you can say and should receive

It is time to rise up and defend free speech. We cannot let lies and fake news control us. These Big Tech censors demand that you live in fear while they contribute to ignorance. They need to be held accountable.

FDA’s War on Silver and Your Health. FDA, FTC and DOJ have decided that their job is to hack (electronically attack) and send official Warning Letters to legitimate health information and product suppliers.

This is not the first time the US Government has attacked us for telling the truth about the supportive actions of Nano Silver 10 PPM. Remember Ebola? In 2014 , as the Ebola outbreak killed thousands in West Africa, the Natural Solutions Foundation was able to get several hundred bottles of Nano Silver to one of the hardest-hit countries, Sierra Leone. The Hon. Alpha Kanu, Minister of Information, was very grateful and let the world know that Nano Silver supported strong immune system response.

Source:

Yale University. National Institutes of Health: U.S. National Library of Medicine. COVID-19 Vaccine Messaging, Part 1. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04460703. (Accessed: 2020, August 19).

U.S. House Subcommittee on Antitrust, Commercial, and Administrative Law. Online Platforms and Market Power, Part 6: Examining the Dominance of Amazon, Apple, Facebook, and Google. (2020, July 29).

Fair Use Notice: Images/logos/graphics on this page contains some copyrighted material whose use has not been authorized by the copyright owners. We believe that this not-for-profit, educational, and/or criticism or commentary use on the Web constitutes a fair use of the copyrighted material (as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law).