Tag Archives: CDC gaslighting

DEBORAH BIRX UNMASKED – I BET YOU DON’T KNOW THIS ABOUT THE SCARF LADY

Birx is a pivotal member of the Medical Mafia – here are some stories you might not know about the evil scarf lady. Can you support this channel with a financial gift? Visit my website: https://amazingpolly.net/contact-support.php Birx now says she knew all along that the Covid vaccines wouldn’t work and admitted to subverting the US government (and tricking the world!) in multiple ways while on the COVID-19 Task Force.

Dr. Deborah Birx reveals LIVE who is running the CORONA HOAX

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

 

CDC Director Violates FDA’s Emergency Use Authorizations and Posts Misinformation about COVID-19 Vaccines

While Twitter has suspended and permanently blocked numerous individuals for posting so-called “misinformation” concerning COVID-19 vaccines, it has not done so to “health” authorities – those who arguably should be held to an even higher standard – when they blatantly share inaccurate information.
On June 18, 2022, CDC Director Rochelle Walensky posted a tweet with a video of herself discussing the CDC’s recent recommendation of the COVID-19 shots for children under 5. In the video, Dr. Walensky made the following two claims:
  • “We now know based on rigorous scientific review that the vaccines available here in the United States can be used safely and effectively in children under 5.”
  • “We have taken another important step together on our fight against COVID-19 by making safe and effective vaccines available for our little ones.”
But as Dr. Walensky should certainly be aware, in issuing Emergency Use Authorizations (EUAs), the FDA has not (under its ridiculously low standards) made a finding that these vaccines are “safe and effective.” Instead, the grant of an EUA means only that the FDA has determined “it is reasonable to believe that [each vaccine] may be effective” and that “it is reasonable to conclude, based on the totality of scientific evidence available, that the known and potential benefits of [each vaccine] outweigh the known and potential risks of the vaccine.”

By claiming – two separate times – that these vaccines are “safe and effective,” Dr. Walensky is misleading the public by suggesting these vaccines have met the legal standard required for licensure.

Worse yet, because her tweet is “descriptive printed matter” that is both advertising and promoting Pfizer’s and Moderna’s vaccines, the tweet itself is in violation of both EUAs issued to these companies because it does not “clearly and conspicuously” contain the required disclaimer that these products have not yet been licensed as safe and effective by the FDA.

ICAN, through its attorneys, has sent Dr. Walensky a formal letter demanding that she immediately remove the misleading tweet and we will keep you posted on the CDC’s response.

To share this legal update, please use this link: https://www.icandecide.org/ican_press/cdc-director-violates-fdas-emergency-use-authorizations-and-posts-misinformation-about-covid-19-vaccines/

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

YOU DID NOTHING: TRUTH BOMB ON FDA

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

COVID-19 Vaccine Manufacturers Fail to Properly Investigate Adverse Events Reports

Vaccine manufacturers, like the rest of the public, must submit a FOIA to the FDA to obtain additional information regarding serious adverse events, including deaths, submitted to VAERS. The problem: they are not doing it.
 
At the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) meeting in April 2021, Janssen’s Chief Medical Officer gave a presentation regarding the safety of its J&J COVID-19 vaccine. During his presentation, he indicated that pharma companies, like the public, only gain access to VAERS reports each Friday when they are released, and that, because “there is significant redaction of some of the data fields,” “it is not possible for [vaccine manufacturers] to follow-up for further information,” except that they “can attempt to do so through Freedom of Information [Act] applications.” Implying this was a common practice, Dr. Maree stated that the “FDA has been very supportive in helping [them] try to expedite these requests.”

ICAN set out to determine if vaccine manufacturers were, in fact, investigating VAERS reports of serious injuries by making FOIA requests to the FDA. Through its attorneys, ICAN requested that  the FDA provide copies of all FOIA requests submitted by ModernaJohnson & Johnson, and Pfizer since the inception of the companies’ COVID-19 vaccines.

For those familiar with these companies’ history, the results will not be all that surprising. Based on the FDA’s response so far, two of the three vaccine manufacturers did not submit a single FOIA request to the FDA regarding reports of adverse events to their COVID-19 vaccines.

  • Moderna filed one single FOIA request in April 2021 for a copy of the FDA’s site visit report of its facility in Massachusetts – but not a single FOIA about an adverse event following vaccination.
  • Johnson & Johnson submitted one single FOIA request in July 2021 for the FDA’s risk assessment regarding benzene levels in aerosol sunscreen – but again, not a single FOIA about an adverse event following vaccination.
  • Pfizer submitted only four FOIA requests for VAERS reports related to its COVID-19 vaccine between December 18, 2020 and February 7, 2021, at least three of which were apparently at the FDA’s prompting. Two of Pfizer’s requests related to anaphylaxis and syncope indicated they were in response to an FDA “query,” that specifically told Pfizer it “may request a copy of redacted VAERS report[s] via FOIA.”  Pfizer has not filed a single FOIA request since February 2021, nor has it filed any requests related to any other adverse event following vaccination, including myocarditis.
Unfortunately, as the experiences of many vaccine-injured individuals have proven, these companies do not appear to be adhering to their claims of taking adverse events to their products seriously. ICAN, however, does and we will continue to hold these companies accountable.

To share this legal update, please use this link: https://www.icandecide.org/ican_press/covid-19-vaccine-manufacturers-fail-to-properly-investigate-adverse-events-reports/

Source: https://www.icandecide.org

MONKEYPOX – WE HAVE TWO DAYS TO PROVE TO EVERYBODY THAT THIS IS AN AGENDA AGAIN! – DR DAVE MARTIN

Fauci’s NIAID Received $10M MONKEYPOX Research Grant Last Year: Report https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HEWSPTnNeb4

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

 

This is a serial killer

This is a serial killer

She KNOWS what she’s doing, that’s the scary part of it

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

Aborted fetal cells: It is now clear who is actually spreading “myths.”

FDA Incompetence and Ammunition Against Senator Richard Pan in One Fell Swoop

Because politicians and other high profile individuals were claiming that vaccines do not contain aborted fetal material, ICAN made a simple request to the FDA for “[d]ocuments sufficient to show that the MMR, Varicella and Hepatitis A vaccines contain material from the cell line of aborted fetal tissue.”

After 238 days, the FDA finally confirmed that there is material from aborted fetal tissue in these vaccines by referring ICAN to the package inserts for these products.

With that admission, someone should inform Dr. Richard Pan (California State Senator) and Stephen Sweeney (former New Jersey State Senator and Senate President), because both of them asserted that vaccines do not contain such aborted fetal material, including during their quest to eliminate religious exemptions to vaccination!

Dr. Pan even stated on the floor of the California Senate that “vaccines are not made from aborted fetal cells, that unfortunately is a myth” and that “the continuing production of those vaccines do not involve aborted fetal cells.” Dr. Pan’s website similarly states that it is a “MYTH” to claim that aborted fetal tissue or cells are present in the vaccines.

It is now clear who is actually spreading “myths.”

To share this legal update, please use this link: https://www.icandecide.org/ican_press/fda-incompetence-and-ammunition-against-senator-richard-pan-in-one-fell-swoop/

Source: https://www.icandecide.org

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

#SCIENTIFICFRAUD: PFIZER AND CDC COMMITTED FRAUD

PFIZER AND CDC COMMITTED FRAUD BY WITHHOLDING CRITICAL DATA RESULTING IN HARM AND DEATH TO MILLIONS!

There are people out in the world that legitimately believe that they need me to get a vaccine in order for their 4 vaccine shots to work.

I randomly think about that sometimes and laugh out loud – Candace Owens.

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

Remdesivir: A Child Sacrifice

Child Sacrifice: The FDA Approved Remdesivir Based on a Trial in Which 3 out of 53 Children Died

The trial was conducted by Gilead, the developer of remdesivir, and there was no control group.

The mortality rate of children with no treatment against COVID is 0.005% (1 in 20,000 die).

Based on this trial, the mortality rate of children with remdesivir treatment is 5.66% (1 in 17.7 die).

Dr. Meryl Nass: “Over 70% had an adverse reaction, 21% had a serious adverse event, and three of the children died. Because there was no control group, it’s unclear how either Gilead or the FDA determined that the drug benefited children, because there’s nothing to compare it to.”

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

CDC & FDA: Whistle-blower employees say they feared ‘retaliation’ if they spoke up

At this point, people who follow and comply with the main stream narrative are complicit in the agenda being rolled out.

CDC and FDA ‘altered’ Covid guidance and even ‘suppressed’ findings while under political pressure, bombshell report suggests: Whistle-blower employees say they feared ‘retaliation’ if they spoke up

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-10759403/CDC-FDA-altered-Covid-guidance-pressure-bombshell-report-claims.html

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.