Chlorine dioxide (Dióxido de cloro)

 

ABAJO LES DEJO TODOS LOS LINKS DE LOS ESTUDIOS CIENTÍFICOS Y PATENTES A FAVOR DEL DIÓXIDO DE CLORO, ASÍ COMO LOS DATOS NECESARIOS PARA INTERPRETARLOS. EL SENADO DE BOLIVIA APROBÓ UNA LEY PARA LA PRODUCCIÓN CONTROLADA Y LA DISTRIBUCIÓN GRATUITA DE DIÓXIDO DE CLORO A LA POBLACIÓN PARA CURAR Y PREVENIR EL COVID-19 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Idf2gnHOV5Q&t=11s
LOS GOBIERNOS CORRUPTOS Y LAS GRANDES FARMACÉUTICAS ESTÁN CENSURÁNDOLO POR LOS ENORMES INTERESES ECONÓMICOS QUE HAY DETRÁS.
LA DOSIS RECOMENDADA PARA EVITAR EL CONTAGIO ES LA SIGUIENTE; TOMAR 10 MILILITROS DE UNA SOLUCIÓN DE MEDIO LITRO DE DIÓXIDO DE CLORO CON AGUA QUE ESTÁ A 3000 PPM (PARTES POR MILLÓN), Y AGREGARLA A UN LITRO DE AGUA (ESOS 10 MILILITROS EQUIVALEN A 30 PPM), EL LITRO DE AGUA DIVIDIRLO EN 10 TOMAS, Y HACER UNA TOMA CADA HORA (ESTO ES, CADA TOMA TIENE 3 PPM DE DIÓXIDO DE CLORO EN 100 MILILITROS DE AGUA, LO QUE EQUIVALE AL 1% DEL TOTAL DE LA TOMA DE DIÓXIDO DE CLORO; ESTO ES BAJÍSIMO. PARA CURAR COVID-19 RECOMIENDAN DE 15 A 50 MILILITROS DE ESA SOLUCIÓN DE DIÓXIDO DE CLORO CON AGUA DEPENDIENDO DE LA GRAVEDAD DEL PACIENTE.
LES ANEXO LA LISTA DE ESTUDIOS CIENTÍFICOS PUBLICADOS EN DIVERSAS REVISTAS DE MEDICINA SOBRE LA EFECTIVIDAD DEL DIÓXIDO DE CLORO PARA ELIMINAR PATÓGENOS (BACTERIAS, VIRUS Y HONGOS), TANTO EN PLANTAS, ANIMALES Y HUMANOS, ASÍ COMO ESTUDIOS QUE DEMUESTRAN QUE NO ES TÓXICO EN HUMANOS EN ALTAS DOSIS SUMINISTRADAS DURANTE MESES DIARIAMENTE (3 Y 5 MESES); ADEMÁS ACREDITAN QUE EL MODO DE ACCIÓN DEL DIÓXIDO DE CLORO EN EL ORGANISMO ES SELECTIVO, ES DECIR QUE NO ATACA LAS CÉLULAS “BENIGNAS” DEL CUERPO HUMANO, Y TAMBIÉN DEMUESTRAN QUE DESACTIVA VIRUS Y ELIMINA BACTERIAS Y PARÁSITOS PEQUEÑOS EN EL AGUA Y EN EL AIRE DISPERSADO EN SU FORMA NATURAL DE GAS.
LA DOSIS TÓXICA DE DIÓXIDO DE CLORO INGERIDO CON AGUA, EN MONOS VERDES, ES DE 292 MILILITROS DE SOLUCIÓN DE DIÓXIDO DE CLORO EN AGUA, AL DÍA POR KILOGRAMO DE PESO DEL ANIMAL; ES DECIR, SI EL ANIMAL PESA 20 KILOS = 292 x 20 = 5,840 MILILITROS DE SOLUCIÓN DE DIÓXIDO DE CLORO; ESTO ES ALTÍSISISISISMO EN COMPARACIÓN CON LAS DOSIS RECOMENDADAS DE 10 MILILITROS DE DICHA SOLUCIÓN AL DÍA.

 

 

EL SIGUIENTE ESTUDIO REALIZADO EN 2013, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3818415/ ESTABLECE QUE, INGERIDO ORALMENTE DISUELTO EN AGUA, EL MODO DE ACCIÓN DEL DIÓXIDO DE CLORO ES SELECTIVO ESTO ES, QUE NO ATACA A LAS CÉLULAS “BENIGNAS” DEL CUERPO.
EL DIÓXIDO DE CLORO NO ES TÓXICO EN LAS DOSIS RECOMENDADAS; PARA MUESTRA, UN BOTÓN (DE MUCHÍSIMOS QUE HAY) https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10934520600657016?journalCode=lesa20
Y ESTE ÚLTIMO LINK ES DE UN ESTUDIO QUE SE ESTABA REALIZANDO EN COLOMBIA ESPECÍFICAMENTE PARA COMBATIR COVID-19, PERO LO SABOTEÓ UNA TELEVISORA COLOMBIANA, Y DE PRONTO YA NO SE PUBLICARÁN RESULTADOS
.
POR OTRA PARTE, LES ANEXO UN LINK PARA DESCARGAR un documento de la ATSDR Agency for Toxic Substances & Disease Registry de los Estados Unidos, en donde realizaron el perfil toxicológico del Dióxido de Cloro y del Clorito de Sodio y sus subproductos en agua, a partir de muchísimos estudios científicos realizados en ratas, monos y humanos, publicados desde 1940 a 2004; está muy completo y muy interesante (está en inglés pero vale la pena). AVALA QUE LAS DOSIS DE DIÓXIDO DE CLORO RECOMENDADAS SON SEGURAS EN HUMANOS (NO LO DIGO YO, LO DICE LA AGENCIA FEDERAL DE SUBSTANCIAS TÓXICAS Y CONTROL DE ENFERMEDADES DEL GOBIERNO DE ESTADOS UNIDOS; EN CONTRAPOSICIÓN DE LO QUE DICE LA FDA FEDERAL DRUG ADMINISTRATION DE ESTADOS UNIDOS, SIN UN SOLO ESTUDIO CIENTÍFICO NI CASO DE MUERTE REPORTADO QUE AVALE TODO LO NEGATIVO QUE DICE SOBRE EL DIÓXIDO DE CLORO PARA COMBATIR LA PANDEMIA). Checar las páginas 30 a 67 del PDF documento.
LES COMPARTO MÁS ESTUDIOS DE LA NO TOXICIDAD DEL DIÓXIDO DE CLORO EN LAS DOSIS RECOMENDADAS (Apenas algunos que se pueden encontrar buscando sin esfuerzo):
1º La misma OMS tiene publicado en 2002 que no es tóxico en humanos en bajas dosis en este estudio:
2º Evaluaciones clínicas controladas de dióxido de cloro, clorito y clorato en el hombre. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1569027/ a dosis bajas
3º Estudio hecho en ratones https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5369164/ no notaron cambios en hasta 40ppm ingesta por meses.
4º Uno de los estudios mas importantes explica porque NO DAÑA CELULAS ANIMALES (HUMANOS INCLUIDOS) https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3818415/
5º La misma EPA cuenta el método de absorción del dióxido de cloro a sangre. https://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/iris/iris_documents/documents/toxreviews/0648tr.pdf
ADEMÁS LES ANEXO UNOS LINKS PARA QUE DESCARGUEN PATENTES DE DIÓXIDO DE CLORO OTORGADAS EN CHINA CONTRA EL CÁNCER; PARA COMBATIR TUMORES CANCERIGENOS COMO INDUCTOR DE APOPTOSIS, ASÍ COMO TUMORES CANCERÍGENOS DISTALES Y METÁSTASIS, Y SU PREVENCIÓN; ASIMISMO, OTRAS PATENTES OTORGADAS AL REDEDOR DEL MUNDO PARA COMBATIR ALZHEIMER, ESCLEROSIS MÚLTIPLE, ESCLEROSIS LATERAL AMIOTRÓFICA Y TODA CLASE DE ENFERMEDADES INFECCIOSAS.
FINALMENTE, LES COMPARTO ALGUNOS TESTIMONIOS Y PETICIONES DE MÉDICOS y PERSONAL MÉDICO EN TODA LATINOAMÉRICA (SON MILES, ESTOS SON SÓLO ALGUNOS), PARA QUE SE INVESTIGUE Y UTILICE EL DIÓXIDO DE CLORO COMO MEDICAMENTO CONTRA EL COVID-19 (DAN NOMBRE COMPLETO Y NÚMERO DE CÉDULA PROFESIONAL) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N4FFyerdAT4
Fair Use Notice: Images/logos/graphics on this page contains some copyrighted material whose use has not been authorized by the copyright owners. We believe that this not-for-profit, educational, and/or criticism or commentary use on the Web constitutes a fair use of the copyrighted material (as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law).

Vaccinaties – Vaccinations

Heel veel mensen weten niet dat vaccineren een keuze is en dat het doorlopen van kinderziektes ook een belangrijke functie heeft. Bovendien bevatten vaccins heel veel lichaamsvreemde stoffen die meer schade aanrichten dan goeds. En hoezo kan de samenleving pas weer terug naar normaal als er een corona-vaccin is?! 👉Kijk live mee of later terug door op ‘herinnering ontvangen’ te klikken. Van maandag 27 juli t/m zondag 2 augustus zal Onafhankelijke Pers Nederland in samenwerking met haar media partners een eigen programmering uitzenden. 💌 Ontvang dagelijks een e-mail met daarin de programmering, achtergrondinformatie en alles wat je niet zag op TV via http://www.onafhankelijkepersnederland.nl/week-zonder-tv/ 🙏 Deel deze video met iedereen die toe is aan het nieuwe TV kijken en wil weten wat er echt speelt in de wereld.

De volgende onderwerpen zijn aan bod geweest. Je kunt zelf zappen naar jouw gewenste onderwerp. Veel kijkplezier.

👉 Video over uitleg Corona op 7:20 min
👉 Video DelBegTree – WHO’s authority op 15:15 min (Engelstalig)
👉 Video van Stanley Plotkin ingrediënten vaccins zit op 36:50 min (Engelstalig)
👉 Interview van Eva met Ramon Walter – waarheidsonderzoeker vaccins op 45:15 min
👉 Vaccinatielied op 1:59:40 min
👉 Interview Miss Natural op SBS6 – want niet uitgezonden werd op 2:08:40 min
👉 Ronald Bernard over 5G op 2:23:50 min
👉 Hans Moolenburgh lezing over gezondheid op 2:38:30 min

Fair Use Notice: Images/logos/graphics on this page contains some copyrighted material whose use has not been authorized by the copyright owners. We believe that this not-for-profit, educational, and/or criticism or commentary use on the Web constitutes a fair use of the copyrighted material (as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law).

#TrustStamp: Biometric Digital Identity

Huge foreign loans are given to sovereign nations by the World Bank, IMF and the likes. But the conditions that come attached to these loans are seldom told by governments to their citizens. A recent case in Belarus has exposed the conditions laid by these agencies for loans being provided for COVID-19. The President of Belarus has exposed that the World Bank coronavirus aid comes with conditions for imposing extreme lockdown measures, to model their coronavirus response on that of Italy and even changes in the economic policies which he refused as being “unacceptable”.

World Bank Coronavirus Aid Comes With Conditions For Imposing Extreme Lockdown, Reveals Belarus President
EXPOSED: World Bank Coronavirus Aid Comes With Conditions For Imposing Extreme Lockdown, Reveals Belarus President

Additional conditions which do not apply to the financial part are unacceptable for Belarus, Belarus President Aleksandr Lukashenko said when speaking about external lending during a meeting to discuss support measures for the real economic sector on the part of the banking system, reported Belarusian Telegraph Agency, BelTA.

Aleksandr Lukashenko asked the participants of the meeting how things were with the provision of foreign credit assistance to Belarus. “What are our partners’ requirements? It was announced that they can provide Belarus with $940 million in so-called rapid financing. How are things here?” the head of state inquired.

At the same time, he stressed that additional conditions which do not apply to the financial part are unacceptable for the country.

“We hear the demands, for example, to model our coronavirus response on that of Italy. I do not want to see the Italian situation to repeat in Belarus. We have our own country and our own situation,” the president said.

According to the president, the World Bank has showed interest in Belarus’ coronavirus response practices.

“It is ready to fund us ten times more than it offered initially as a token of commendation for our efficient fight against this virus. The World Bank has even asked the Healthcare Ministry to share the experience. Meanwhile, the IMF continues to demand from us quarantine measures, isolation, a curfew. This is nonsense. We will not dance to anyone’s tune,” said the president.

Belarus is one of the only European countries that has not implemented strict coronavirus containment measures. The no-restriction situation is such that even the non-essential services remain open. The football league of Belarus is still being played. The only restriction kind-of step that Belarus took till now is that the school holidays have been extended.

Lukashenko is of the opinion that a complete lockdown was completely unnecessary. Similar, views have been expressed by many renowned scientists as well. Recently, an Indian doctor has debunked the official narrative on Coronavirus. He emphasizes that ‘stress affects health’ and said that fear isn’t necessary because eventually people will develop natural immunity to this virus. He is one of the few people to advocate the opinion that life must continue uninterrupted.

The President of Belarus is not the first one to have exposed the pressure exerted by global agencies amidst the coronavirus crisis to further their agenda. Earlier, in a shocking development the President of Madagascar made a sensational claim that the WHO offered him $20m bribe to poison COVID-19 cure called COVID-19 Organics made from Artemisia.

The Tanzanian President kicked out WHO from the country after Goat and Papaya samples came COVID-19 positive. Days after the Tanzanian move, Burundi also kicked out WHO Coronavirus Team from the country for interference in internal matters.

It was also revealed in an intercepted human intelligence report that Bill Gates offered $10 million bribe for a forced Coronavirus vaccination program in Nigeria. After which, an Italian politician demanded the arrest of Bill Gates in the Italian parliament. She also exposed Bill Gates’ agenda in India and Africa, along with the plans to chip the human race through the digital identification program ID2020.

Source:

EXPOSED: World Bank Coronavirus Aid Comes With Conditions For Imposing Extreme Lockdown, Reveals Belarus President

Fair Use Notice: Images/logos/graphics on this page contains some copyrighted material whose use has not been authorized by the copyright owners. We believe that this not-for-profit, educational, and/or criticism or commentary use on the Web constitutes a fair use of the copyrighted material (as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law).

URGENT: Frontline doctors censored

Reposted by permission from Liberty Counsel Action

Today, Facebook, Google, Apple, and Amazon CEOs are all scheduled to testify before the U.S. House. Now is our chance to hold Big Tech accountable for the shocking and horrific censorship of America’s Frontline Doctors and the major studies and medical information they tried to give the American people yesterday.

Send your urgent fax right now to put the pressure on these Tech giants. – Mat

About a dozen medical experts gathered on Capitol Hill yesterday to give a press conference discussing medical research and their personal experiences as doctors on the frontlines of COVID-19. They exposed explosive details about how relevant information has been censored.

But rather than allowing you to view the press conference and decide for yourself, YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, and Squarespace censored and silenced these medical experts because their opinions did not align with the political agenda of these Big Tech and Pharma companies.

This is the equivalent of the phone company having the power to turn off your service because the company disagrees with what you are saying. These tech corporations are actively working to control you by censoring information. This is chilling.

I’ll expose what these doctors shared below, but first, Liberty Counsel Action has created a two-step plan to break this censorship. We need your help to demand a solution. President Trump already asked the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to make rules to regulate the companies that are censoring social media. The FCC needs to hear from you.

In addition, there is bipartisan support in Congress to repeal the law that provides legal immunity to Big Tech social media and internet companies. Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act was passed when the internet and social media were in their infancy. They operated as neutral providers. But, now, Big Tech is censoring, and should be held liable when their censorship causes harm. Section 230 should be repealed.

I urge you to take action today. Demand the FCC and Congress to act to protect our freedom of speech. If we don’t protect the freedom to speak the truth in America, all of our freedoms will be at risk.

Send your fax to demand that Big Tech corporations face consequences for hiding the truth from Americans.

The press conference in front of the Supreme Court building with the medical experts from America’s Frontline Doctors immediately went viral. When that happened, Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, and Google censored the video.

The organization then posted a three-hour meeting packed full of information on its website … until SquareSpace (the hosting company) shut that down too. So, I’ll give you the highlights.

One of the medical experts has extensive, firsthand experience using hydroxychloroquine in her home of Africa. She said it is safe for all ages (except people with psoriasis). Here in America she has treated more than 350 COVID-19 patients—some with asthma, diabetes, high blood pressure, as well as elderly people and pregnant women—all with a 100% success rate using hydroxychloroquine, zinc, and Zithromax.

Some of the patients were coming to her with significant breathing problems, convinced they were going to die. This doctor says, “I hug them, and I tell them that it’s going to be okay. You’re going to live. And we treat them, and they leave.” Not one of her patients has died. She said there are 500 articles about hydroxychloroquine worldwide.

In addition, there have been 11 independent studies since February 19, 2020, which, she said, show the effectiveness of treating COVID-19 with some form of hydroxychloroquine. Studies were from France, India, Brazil, Saudi Arabia, Iran, New York, China, and one study that spanned 16 countries. In New York, a nursing home, which had more than a 50 percent death rate, dropped their death rate to less than 6 percent. Studies that did not show improvement involved patients who received the treatment 10 days after the onset of symptoms. Early treatment is very important, she said.

But mentioning real medical studies or clinical experience is not allowed on Facebook, YouTube, or Instagram if some tech geek disagrees.

I am sick of Big Tech censoring and de-platforming speech with which they don’t approve. The FCC must establish protections for speech and Congress must remove legal immunity from Big Tech when they infringe on speech. Send your fax to the FCC and Congress today.

“Actually, in the places where everybody is already taking it [HCQ], they don’t have COVID,” summarized Dr. Richard Urso. He did a comparison which exposed that America’s death rate is 400 times the death rate of impoverished Sub-Sahara Africa, which was also receiving direct flights from China. Often, travelers commonly take hydroxychloroquine prior to traveling to these communities to prevent malaria.

Dr. Urso was so confident in his conclusions that he made an open challenge to Johns Hopkins or anyone that could prove him wrong, that he would give them $200,000. No one has taken him up on that offer. He finished his speech with the statement, “Hydroxychloroquine works.”

Big Tech doesn’t want you to hear alternative viewpoints that can save lives. Let Americans think for themselves.

When I was growing up, the Soviet Union was a world power. Its state-run media was Pravda, which censored everything the people read or saw. I was glad to live in America where we could know the truth. But now we are no different than the state-run media of a communist country, with social media and other traditional media misrepresenting and/or censoring information.

Will we allow censorship—by our silence—when the Soviet Union had to enforce it at the point of a gun? Make your voice heard in the FCC and Congress to end this censorship with your fax now.

No matter whether you agree with these doctors, Americans need to maintain the freedom to hear differing viewpoints and to evaluate all the evidence and decide for themselves what is true.

Send a fax and sign our petition to the FCC and congressional leaders.

It’s our goal at Liberty Counsel Action to build an educated, organized army of peaceful patriots that can fight for our constitutional rights in the halls of Congress and bureaucratic offices all around our nation. We can only do this because of the faithful support of freedom-loving Americans who partner with our vision and support our organization.

As we come to the end of this month, I ask you to partner with us. The battle is intensifying, and, with your help, I want to mount a powerful defense of our freedom of speech and your right to receive information.

I want you to have the ability to see several perspectives and decide for yourself what is the truth. Not to have some computer geek decide what medical information you can and can’t have.

Fair Use Notice: Images/logos/graphics on this page contains some copyrighted material whose use has not been authorized by the copyright owners. We believe that this not-for-profit, educational, and/or criticism or commentary use on the Web constitutes a fair use of the copyrighted material (as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law).

Make History. Destroy Fake Science

On 14 May, 2020, I personally delivered your and others 100k+ signatures to the President. I received a phone call from the White House and shared all the lies and fraud of Fauci.

I’ve called a debate on July 29th with Fauci at MIT Kendall Square at 12 noon. Our #FireFauci campaign, which WE unleashed – has had a massive impact to awaken the world on Fake Science.

We have less than 35 days to WIN the US SENATE Primary in MA, and we MUST WIN. Our winning will be the equivalent of a nuke going off on the #DeepState, whose headquarters is Massachusetts.

We need to raise $500,000 in the next 5 days to purchase media advertising on TV and RADIO. If each of you donate just $10, we can achieve our goal. Please note, you must be a US resident to donate.

It’s time we move beyond black and white, left and right and unite to WIN Truth Freedom Health.

Make history, destroy fake science.

Be the Light,
Dr.SHIVA

Fair Use Notice: Images/logos/graphics on this page contains some copyrighted material whose use has not been authorized by the copyright owners. We believe that this not-for-profit, educational, and/or criticism or commentary use on the Web constitutes a fair use of the copyrighted material (as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law).fa

RFK JR. DISHES ON DEBATE & CURRENT CENSORSHIP

RFK JR. DISHES ON DEBATE & CURRENT CENSORSHIP HW Special Report: RFK Jr. discusses how his recent debate with Alan Dershowitz on mandatory vaccines struck a chord with yesterday’s censored “Frontline Doctors.”

https://www.bitchute.com/video/S2714ylczhMl/

Fair Use Notice: Images/logos/graphics on this page contains some copyrighted material whose use has not been authorized by the copyright owners. We believe that this not-for-profit, educational, and/or criticism or commentary use on the Web constitutes a fair use of the copyrighted material (as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law).

Why Everyone Was Wrong – CoronaVirus Sars-CoV-2

Absent in the mainstream news is the report from Swiss magazine Die Weltwoche (World Week) published by Dr. Beda M. Stadler, former Director of the Institute for Immunology at the University of Bern in Switzerland, titled, “Why Everyone Is/Was Wrong About the Coronavirus.” Dr. Stadler concludes the vast majority of virologists and epidemiologists have been making erroneous statements since the coronavirus first hit and admits to also making the same incorrect assumptions at first.

A key point in the article is to counter the widely promoted claim that what makes COVID-19 so frightening is as a novel virus, humans have no natural immunity to it. As Dr. Stadler points out:

“Even Anthony Fauci, the most important advisor to the Trump administration, noted at the beginning at every public appearance that the danger of the virus lay in the fact that there was no immunity against it.
Tony and I often sat next to each other at immunology seminars at the National Institute of Health in Bethesda in the US, because we worked in related fields back then. So, for a while I was pretty uncritical of his statements, since he was a respectable colleague of mine.”

Dr. Stadler followed with the fact, “In reality, nobody had a test ready to prove such a statement. That wasn’t science, but pure speculation based on a gut feeling that was then parroted by everyone.”

The “scaremongers” he points out are alarmist doctors, media who constantly put out fear-inducing images and statements, and federal officials who keep insisting on imposing tracing apps, even though they will never work given the ignorance surrounding what it is actually measured in any effective way.

########################################

Note: The original article was published in the Swiss magazine Weltwoche (World Week) on June 10th. The author, Beda M Stadler is the former director of the Institute for Immunology at the University of Bern, a biologist and professor emeritus. Stadler is an important medical professional in Switzerland, he also likes to use provoking language, which should not deter you from the points he makes.

This article is about Switzerland and it does not suggest that the situation is exactly the same globally. I suggest to read to the end, because Stadler makes crucial points about testing for Sars-CoV-2. This is an opinion piece adopted from Medium.com and it does not necessarily reflect that of WHN, this is merely a look at the current situation via a perspective/outlook different from what is being portrayed in the media. Regardless of whether it is correct or not, it does make some good points, and it is, at the very least, a thought provoking interesting read.

Coronavirus: Why everyone was wrong

~The coronavirus is slowly retreating. What actually happened in the past few weeks? The experts have missed basic connections. The immune response against the virus is much stronger than we thought.

Written by: Beda M. Stadler

This is not an accusation, but a ruthless taking stock [of the current situation]. I could slap myself, because I looked at Sars-CoV2- way too long with panic. I am also somewhat annoyed with many of my immunology colleagues who so far have left the discussion about Covid-19 to virologists and epidemiologists. I feel it is time to criticize some of the main and completely wrong public statements about this virus.

Firstly, it was wrong to claim that this virus was novel. Secondly, It was even more wrong to claim that the population would not already have some immunity against this virus. Thirdly, it was the crowning of stupidity to claim that someone could have Covid-19 without any symptoms at all or even to pass the disease along without showing any symptoms whatsoever.

But let’s look at this one by one.

1. A new virus?

At the end of 2019 a coronavirus, which was considered novel, was detected in China. When the gene sequence, i.e. the blueprint of this virus, was identified and was given a similar name to the 2002 identified Sars, i.e. Sars-CoV-2, we should have already asked ourselves then how far [this virus] is related to other coronaviri, which can make human beings sick. But no, instead we discussed from which animal as part of a Chinese menu the virus might have sprung. In the meantime, however, many more people believe the Chinese were so stupid as to release this virus upon themselves in their own country. Now that we’re talking about developing a vaccine against the virus, we suddenly see studies which show that this so-called novel virus is very strongly related to Sars-1 as well as other beta-coronaviri which make us suffer every year in the form of a colds. Apart from the pure homologies in the sequence between the various coronaviri which can make people sick, [scientists] currently work on identifying a number of areas on the virus in the same way as human immune cells identify them. This is no longer about the genetic relationship, but about how our immune system sees this virus, i.e. which parts of other coronaviri could potentially be used in a vaccine.

So: Sars-Cov-2 isn’t all that new, but merely a seasonal cold virus that mutated and disappears in summer, as all cold viri do — which is what we’re observing globally right now. Flu viri mutate significantly more, by the way, and nobody would ever claim that a new flu virus strain was completely novel. Many veterinary doctors were therefore annoyed by this claim of novelty, as they have been vaccinating cats, dogs, pigs, and cows for years against coronaviri.

2. The fairy tale of no immunity

From the World Health Organisation (WHO) to every Facebook-virologist, everyone claimed this virus was particularly dangerous, because there was no immunity against it, because it was a novel virus. Even Anthony Fauci, the most important advisor to the Trump administration noted at the beginning at every public appearance that the danger of the virus lay in the fact that there was no immunity against it. Tony and I often sat next to each other at immunology seminars at the National Institute of Health in Bethesda in the US, because we worked in related fields back then. So for a while I was pretty uncritical of his statements, since he was a respectable colleague of mine. The penny dropped only when I realized that the first commercially available antibody test [for Sars-CoV-2] was put together from an old antibody test that was meant to detect Sars-1. This kind of test evaluates if there are antibodies in someone’s blood and if they came about through an early fight against the virus. [Scientists] even extracted antibodies from a Lama that would detect Sars-1, Sars-CoV-2, and even the Mers virus. It also became known that Sars-CoV-2 had a less significant impact in areas in China where Sars-1 had previously raged. This is clear evidence urgently suggesting that our immune system considers Sars-1 and Sars-Cov-2 at least partially identical and that one virus could probably protect us from the other.

That’s when I realized that the entire world simply claimed that there was no immunity, but in reality, nobody had a test ready to prove such a statement. That wasn’t science, but pure speculation based on a gut feeling that was then parroted by everyone. To this day there isn’t a single antibody test that can describe all possible immunological situations, such as: if someone is immune, since when, what the neutralizing antibodies are targeting and how many structures exist on other coronaviri that can equally lead to immunity.

In mid-April work was published by the group of Andreas Thiel at the Charité Berlin. A paper with 30 authors, amongst them the virologist Christian Drosten. It showed that in 34% of people in Berlin who had never been in contact with the Sars-CoV-2 virus showed nonetheless T-cell immunity against it (T-cell immunity is a different kind of immune reaction, see below). This means that our T-cells, i.e. white blood cells, detect common structures appearing on Sars-CoV-2 and regular cold viri and therefore combat both of them.

A study by John P A Ioannidis of Stanford University — according to the Einstein Foundation in Berlin one of the world’s ten most cited scientists — showed that immunity against Sars-Cov-2, measured in the form of antibodies, is much higher than previously thought. Ioannidis is certainly not a conspiracy theorist who just wants to swim against the stream; nonetheless he is now being criticized, because the antibody tests used were not extremely precise. With that, his critics admit that they do not have such tests yet. And aside, John P A Ioannidis is such a scientific heavy-weight that all German virologists combined are light-weight in comparison.

3. The failure of modellers

Epidemiologists also fell for the myth that there was no immunity in the population. They also didn’t want to believe that coronaviri were seasonal cold viri that would disappear in summer. Otherwise their curve models would have looked differently. When the initial worst case scenarios didn’t come true anywhere, some now still cling to models predicting a second wave. Let’s leave them their hopes — I’ve never seen a scientific branch that manoeuvred itself so much into the offside. I have also not yet understood why epidemiologists were so much more interested in the number of deaths, rather than in the numbers that could be saved.

4. Immunology of common sense

As an immunologist I trust a biological model, namely that of the human organism, which has built a tried and tested, adaptive immune system. At the end of February, driving home from the recording of [a Swiss political TV debate show], I mentioned to Daniel Koch [former head of the Swiss federal section “Communicable Diseases” of the Federal Office of Public Health] that I suspected there was a general immunity in the population against Sars-Cov-2. He argued against my view. I later defended him anyway, when he said that children were not a driving factor in the spread of the pandemic. He suspected that children didn’t have a receptor for the virus, which is of course nonsense. Still, we had to admit that his observations were correct. But the fact that every scientist attacked him afterwards and asked for studies to prove his point, was somewhat ironic. Nobody asked for studies to prove that people in certain at-risk groups were dying. When the first statistics from China and later worldwide data showed the same trend, that is to say that almost no children under ten years old got sick, everyone should have made the argument that children clearly have to be immune. For every other disease that doesn’t afflict a certain group of people, we would come to the conclusion that that group is immune. When people are sadly dying in a retirement home, but in the same place other pensioners with the same risk factors are left entirely unharmed, we should also conclude that they were presumably immune.

But this common sense seems to have eluded many, let’s call them “immunity deniers” just for fun. This new breed of deniers had to observe that the majority of people who tested positive for this virus, i.e. the virus was present in their throats, did not get sick. The term “silent carriers” was conjured out of a hat and it was claimed that one could be sick without having symptoms. Wouldn’t that be something! If this principle from now on gets naturalized into the realm of medicine, health insurers would really have a problem, but also teachers whose students could now claim to have whatever disease to skip school, if at the end of the day one didn’t need symptoms anymore to be sick.

The next joke that some virologists shared was the claim that those who were sick without symptoms could still spread the virus to other people. The “healthy” sick would have so much of the virus in their throats that a normal conversation between two people would be enough for the “healthy one” to infect the other healthy one. At this point we have to dissect what is happening here: If a virus is growing anywhere in the body, also in the throat, it means that human cells decease. When [human] cells decease, the immune system is alerted immediately and an infection is caused. One of five cardinal symptoms of an infection is pain. It is understandable that those afflicted by Covid-19 might not remember that initial scratchy throat and then go on to claim that they didn’t have any symptoms just a few days ago. But for doctors and virologists to twist this into a story of “healthy” sick people, which stokes panic and was often given as a reason for stricter lock down measures, just shows how bad the joke really is. At least the WHO didn’t accept the claim of asymptomatic infections and even challenged this claim on its website.

Here is a succinct and brief summary, especially for the immunity deniers, of how humans are attacked by germs and how we react to them: If there are pathogenic viri in our environment, then all humans — whether immune or not — are attacked by this virus. If someone is immune, the battle with the virus begins. First we try to prevent the virus from binding to our own cells with the help of antibodies. This normally works only partially, not all are blocked and some viri will attach to the appropriate cells. That doesn’t need to lead to symptoms, but it’s also not a disease. Because the second guard of the immune system is now called into action. That’s the above mentioned T-cells, white blood cells, which can determine from the outside in which other cells the virus is now hiding to multiply. These cells, which are now incubating the virus, are searched throughout the entire body and killed by the T-cells until the last virus is dead.

So if we do a PCR corona test on an immune person, it is not a virus that is detected, but a small shattered part of the viral genome. The test comes back positive for as long as there are tiny shattered parts of the virus left. Correct: Even if the infectious viri are long dead, a corona test can come back positive, because the PCR method multiplies even a tiny fraction of the viral genetic material enough [to be detected]. That’s exactly what happened, when there was the global news, even shared by the WHO, that 200 Koreans who already went through Covid-19 were infected a second time and that there was therefore probably no immunity against this virus. The explanation of what really happened and an apology came only later, when it was clear that the immune Koreans were perfectly healthy and only had a short battle with the virus. The crux was that the virus debris registered with the overly sensitive test and therefore came back as “positive”. It is likely that a large number of the daily reported infection numbers are purely due to viral debris.

The PCR test with its extreme sensitivity was initially perfect to find out where the virus could be. But this test can not identify whether the virus is still alive, i.e. still infectious. Unfortunately, this also led some virologists to equate the strength of a test result with viral load, i.e. the amount of virus someone can breathe out. Luckily, our day care centres stayed open nonetheless. Since German virologists missed that part, because, out of principle, they do not look at what other countries are doing, even if other countries’ case numbers are falling more rapidly.

5. The problem with corona immunity

What does this all mean in real life? The extremely long incubation time of two to 14 days — and reports of 22 to 27 days — should wake up any immunologist. As well as the claim that most patients would no longer secrete the virus after five days. Both [claims] in turn actually lead to the conclusion that there is — sort of in the background — a base immunity that contorts the events, compared to an expected cycle [of a viral infection] — i.e. leads to a long incubation period and quick immunity. This immunity also seems to be the problem for patients with a severe course of the disease. Our antibody titre, i.e. the accuracy of our defense system, is reduced the older we get. But also people with a bad diet or who are malnourished may have a weakened immune system, which is why this virus does not only reveal the medical problems of a country, but also social issues.

If an infected person does not have enough antibodies, i.e. a weak immune response, the virus slowly spreads out across the entire body. Now that there are not enough antibodies, there is only the second, supporting leg of our immune response left: The T-cells begin to attack the virus-infested cells all over the body. This can lead to an exaggerated immune response, basically to a massive slaughter; this is called a Cytokine Storm. Very rarely this can also happen in small children, in that case called Kawasaki Syndrome. This very rare occurrence in children was also used in our country to stoke panic. It’s interesting, however, that this syndrome is very easily cured. The [affected] children get antibodies from healthy blood donors, i.e. people who went through coronavirus colds. This means that the hushed-up [supposedly non-existent] immunity in the population is in fact used therapeutically.

What now?

The virus is gone for now. It will probably come back in winter, but it won’t be a second wave, but just a cold. Those young and healthy people who currently walk around with a mask on their faces would be better off wearing a helmet instead, because the risk of something falling on their head is greater than that of getting a serious case of Covid-19.

If we observe a significant rise in infections in 14 days [after the Swiss relaxed the lock down], we’d at least know that one of the measures was useful. Other than that I recommend reading John P A Ioannidis’ latest work in which he describes the global situation based on data on May 1st 2020: People below 65 years old make up only 0.6 to 2.6 % of all fatal Covid cases. To get on top of the pandemic, we need a strategy merely concentrating on the protection of at-risk people over 65. If that’s the opinion of a top expert, a second lock down is simply a no-go.

On our way back to normal, it would be good for us citizens if a few scaremongers apologized. Such as doctors who wanted a triage of over 80 year old Covid patients in order to stop ventilating them. Also the media that kept showing alarmist videos of Italian hospitals to illustrate a situation that as such didn’t exist. All politicians calling for “testing, testing, testing” without even knowing what the test actually measures. And the federal government for an app they’ll never get to work and will warn me if someone near me is positive, even if they’re not infectious.

In winter, when the flu and other colds make the rounds again, we can then go back to kissing each other a little less, and we should wash our hands even without a virus present. And people who’ll get sick nonetheless can then don their masks to show others what they have learned from this pandemic. And if we still haven’t learned to protect our at-risk groups, we’ll have to wait for a vaccine that will hopefully also be effective in at-risk people.

Gerald Celente

https://www.worldhealth.net/news/why-everyone-was-wrong/

https://www.weltwoche.ch/ausgaben/2020-24/inland/warum-alle-falsch-lagen-die-weltwoche-ausgabe-24-2020.html

Fair Use Notice: Images/logos/graphics on this page contains some copyrighted material whose use has not been authorized by the copyright owners. We believe that this not-for-profit, educational, and/or criticism or commentary use on the Web constitutes a fair use of the copyrighted material (as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law).

Leaked Documents Show DHS Is Afraid That Masks Will Make Facial Recognition Useless

By John Vibes

As the general public in the United States argues about whether or not we should be wearing masks to prevent the spread of the COVID-19 coronavirus, law enforcement officials are concerned that facial recognition software could be thwarted, and possibly even broken by people wearing masks.

In a collection of law enforcement documents released by Blueleaks, researchers found a Department of Homeland Security intelligence memo where the agency expressed concern about the potential problems that mask-wearing could cause for facial recognition technology.

The note, which was published on May 22nd, discussed what the agency described as “the potential impacts that widespread use of protective masks could have on security operations that incorporate face recognition systems — such as video cameras, image processing hardware and software, and image recognition algorithms — to monitor public spaces during the ongoing Covid-19 public health emergency and in the months after the pandemic subsides.”

The memo went on to suggest that, “violent extremists and other criminals who have historically maintained an interest in avoiding face recognition are likely to opportunistically seize upon public safety measures recommending the wearing of face masks to hinder the effectiveness of face recognition systems in public spaces by security partners.”

The agency admitted that its concerns were based on the fact that activists have traditionally expressed desires to thwart facial recognition, and not on any recent events during the ongoing protests. The report concluded that facial recognition could become increasingly worthless if mask-wearing becomes normalized.

“We assess face recognition systems used to support security operations in public spaces will be less effective while widespread public use of facemasks, including partial and full face covering, is practiced by the public to limit the spread of Covid-19,” the report stated.

Homeland Security’s Customs and Border Protection, which uses facial recognition screening on international travelers, has also claimed that its technology works on masked faces.

In recent months, some companies have claimed that they are developing facial recognition technology that will work with masks. However, facial recognition doesn’t even work that well under normal circumstances, so it is hard to imagine a working system for masked faces.

Amazon’s facial recognition technology falsely identified 27 different professional athletes as criminals. While it may be true that professional football players have been known to get in trouble from time to time, this is obviously a failure of the software.

According to a Freedom of Information request filed by Wired, these are actually typical numbers for the facial recognition software used by the South Wales Police. Data from the department showed that there were false-positive rates of 87 percent and 90 percent for different events.

Similar numbers were released by the FBI in 2016, with the agency also admitting that their facial recognition database consisted of mostly innocent people since they use driver’s license and passport photos for their searches, in addition to mug shots. In fact, there is a 50/50 chance that your picture is in a facial recognition database. Also in 2016, another study found that facial recognition software disproportionately targeted people with dark skin.

Source: The Mind Unleashed

Fair Use Notice: Images/logos/graphics on this page contains some copyrighted material whose use has not been authorized by the copyright owners. We believe that this not-for-profit, educational, and/or criticism or commentary use on the Web constitutes a fair use of the copyrighted material (as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law).

Untested Man Informed by State Health Department That He’s COVID-19 Positive

By B.N. Frank

No matter what your opinion is on any aspect of the current Coronavirus Pandemic, it’s not a bad idea to pay attention to what’s happening where you live. For example, a Kentucky couple was recently put on house arrest – complete with electronic ankle monitors – because the wife didn’t want to sign self-quarantine orders.

 

From WAVE3:

After testing positive but without showing any symptoms, Linscott said the health department contacted her and requested she sign documents that will limit her traveling anywhere unless she calls the health department first. She said she chose to not sign the documents.

“My part was if I have to go to the ER, if I have to go to the hospital, I’m not going to wait to get the approval to go,” she said.

But Linscott said she would take necessary precautions if she needed to go to the hospital, like letting workers know she has recently tested positive for COVID-19.

Now a Tennessee man is reporting erroneous as well as troubling actions being taken by another state health department.

From WSMV:

Mt. Juliet man says even with no test, he’s informed he is COVID-19 positive by state

MOUNT JULIET, TN (WSMV) – Brock Ballou expected the first call.

After all, his co-worker had tested positive for COVID-19, so he expected a call from a contact tracer.

He didn’t anticipate, however, what the tracer would tell him.

“She specifically said – I’m looking at it right here – you tested positive – this is a follow up call to see how your symptoms are,” Ballou said.

There was just one major problem – because he hadn’t experienced any symptoms, Ballou hadn’t been tested yet.

Read full article

As luck would have it, contact tracing has been made easier by the widespread installation of 5G technology. Many American elected officials are using the pandemic as an excuse to use 5G as well as speed up additional installation in order to enforce the monitoring and tracking of citizens. 5G has been used for that purpose in China since before the pandemic including for what has been described as “automated racism” with Chinese Muslims (see 12).

https://youtu.be/JHVYPaztk8o

Opposition to 5G is WORLDWIDE for a variety of valid reasons. Cities AS WELL AS entire countries have taken action to ban, delay, halt, and limit 5G installation as well as issue moratoriums (see 1234567891011, 121314). The majority of scientists are opposed to 5G until studies show that it’s safe.

Activist Post reports regularly about unsafe technology. For more information visit our archives.

Fair Use Notice: Images/logos/graphics on this page contains some copyrighted material whose use has not been authorized by the copyright owners. We believe that this not-for-profit, educational, and/or criticism or commentary use on the Web constitutes a fair use of the copyrighted material (as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law).

The Truth About Masks | COVID-19 Facts

Tony Robbins speaks to Senator Scott Jensen, a family physician from Minnesota, to uncover the truth about masks. After initially discouraging the public to wear masks, the CDC now recommends the use of cloth face coverings to slow the spread of coronavirus. But are they really effective? According to Senator Jensen, the answer is no.
 
This interview is part of the “Facts From the Frontlines” episode of #TheTonyRobbinsPodcast, where Tony uncovers the truth about coronavirus with a 7-person panel of highly qualified researchers, an experienced epidemiologist, a Nobel Laureate, and M.D.s testing and treating patients on the frontlines. Together, they reveal the evidence-based research that has come to light in the last two months.
This is one of the most important interviews Tony has ever conducted. It reminds us to stand guard at the door of our mind, practice discernment when determining trustworthy sources, and think critically in order to stay flexible and maintain the ability to pivot in light of new information – especially when lives depend on it.
To hear the full interview, go here: https://www.tonyrobbins.com/podcasts/
 
*COVID-19 Playlist*
 
Do You Fear COVID-19? Take the survey now! https://www.youtube.com/post/Ugw2ngqc
 
0:00 – Intro
0:15 – Senator Scott Jensen, M.D.
0:26 – COVID Particle Size
0:56 – Why we ware surgical masks
1:16 – Outro
Fair Use Notice: Images/logos/graphics on this page contains some copyrighted material whose use has not been authorized by the copyright owners. We believe that this not-for-profit, educational, and/or criticism or commentary use on the Web constitutes a fair use of the copyrighted material (as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law).

Specializing in Pharmaceutical Technologies