Empty Hospitals; Doctor’s furlough = Fake Virus

The hospital is empty like most people’s brains are empty when they listen to the media.

The same thing happened in NY. People were recording at these so-called “ground zero” hospitals just to find the hospitals were empty or having a “business as usual” day. Meanwhile, MSM was blowing up the lies on TV. The same thing was said about funeral homes. Check out Lincoln Karim on YT. Show him some support. He’s got lots of videos exposing this BS in NYC. From day one I knew NY was getting played. Now when I drive down the roads I see signs on the highway saying “ NY strong”…..more like “NY got suckered again”

My friend’s wife is a nurse and she is laid off collecting unemployment during this plandemic !

A little late to the party, but people were filming empty hospitals back in March/April all over the country under the hashtag #filmyourhospital & #emptyhospitals. I remember youtube was taking down the videos as they were going up but they were all over twitter. I shared as many as I could back then.

Living under constant threat has serious health consequences. Physical health. Fear weakens our immune system and can cause cardiovascular damage, gastrointestinal problems such as ulcers and irritable bowel syndrome, and decreased fertility. It can lead to accelerated aging and even premature death.

Wake up sheeple you’re being lied to so everyone in the world gets vaccinated into the digital currency and social credit score and tracking system and the new normal (NWO).

The Second greatest trick Satan ever pulled was convincing the Sheeple that COVID-19/Corona Virus is real so you all run to get the Mark Of the Beast Vaccine.

ITALY – COVID19, CORONAVIRUS, WOMAN WALKING THROUGH THE BOLOGNA HOSPITAL WHERE MEDIA SAYS ITS FULL WITH INFECTED PEOPLE, PEOPLE DYING IN WAITING ROOMS AND ETC.

I went to a couple hospitals and testing sites to see if these places were as busy as mainstream media is making us believe. So far I’ve been to a total of over 9 hospitals and testing sites and it is not close to what they are showing on the news. I’ve gone from Community Hospitals to City hospitals. Including Boston Medical Center. I spoke to many people in the medical field that work at hospitals all the way from nurses, medical assistance, EMTs and even supporting staff that works at hospitals such as administrative assistants. All of them have told me the hospitals are not busy at all they are actually being sent home or there shifts are being canceled. Most are starting to realize they might be getting laid off themselves and I are going to fall into the non-essential workers. This is starting to wake the masses up because it is affecting them personally. I hope everybody starts to research and realize what it’s actually going on. It’s time to wake up people!!!

Hospital in Norwich, Connecticut same thing. A tent with people dressed for Chernobyl, and no one in the tent. No lines, no hysteria. An hour and a half from New York, the epicenter of us, and it’s just another day here. But the news makes it sound like the zombie apocalypse is upon us.

 

Overwhelmed? Empty hospitals across U.S. and in Europe

FAIR USE NOTICE This video may contain copyrighted material; the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available for the purposes of criticism, comment, review and news reporting which constitute the fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. Not withstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work for purposes such as criticism, comment, review and news reporting is not an infringement of copyright.

#FireDrFauci: List of Mistakes and Lies

1-Fauci says he warned Trump in January that the US was in real trouble but that is not what he said publicly.

TRENDING: Fauci Tells Sharpton He Warned Trump Admin in Mid to Late January “We Were in Real Trouble” from Coronavirus

In January Dr. Anthony Fauci told Newsmax TV that the United States “did not have to worry” about the coronavirus and that it was “not a major threat.

2) warned of an apocalyptic coronavirus pandemic — then just weeks later he later compared the coronavirus to a bad flu.

3.) Dr. Fauci based all of his predictions on garbage IHME models that were OFF BY MILLIONS and then told reporters this past week, “You can’t really rely on models.”

“It is hard to imagine a more stupid or more dangerous way of making decisions than by putting those decisions in the hands of people who pay no price for being wrong.”

― Thomas Sowell

4.) On March 20th Dr. Fauci jumped in and “corrected” the president during a press briefing on hydroxychloroquine treatment for coronavirus saying, “You got to be careful when you say ‘fairly effective.’ It was never done in a clinical trial… It was given to individuals and felt that maybe it worked.”

pushed these garbage models every step of the way.

5) Three weeks ago Dr. Fauci claimed 1 million to 2 million Americans would die from coronavirus. Then he said 100,000 to 200,000 Americans will die from the virus. Then last week he agreed 81,766 Americans would die from the coronavirus. Then by Wednesday, the experts cut the number of deaths to 60,415 projected deaths.

6.)  On Sunday Dr. Fauci said President Trump should have shut down the economy in February.

The president was a bit pre-occupied in February with the Democrat impeachment sham.

That’s not what Dr. Fauci said ON FEBRUARY 29th

But in late February  Fauci told the TODAY Show on February 29 that you don’t need to “change anything you’re doing.”:

*************

Challenging Anthony Fauci

“I don’t think you are the one person who gets to make a decision.  We can listen to your advice but there are people on the other side saying there’s not going to be a surge and we can safely open the economy.”

The speaker was Sen. Rand Paul, in the hearing with the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions on Tuesday.  Sen. Paul, a medical doctor, was addressing Dr. Anthony Fauci of the president’s coronavirus task force.  Dr. Fauci did not appreciate the challenge.

“I’m a scientist, a physician and a public health official,” Fauci said.  The millions of Americans struggling to get their lives back might quibble with the order, and a key part of the description is missing.

Anthony Fauci earned a medical degree from Cornell University in 1966.  He does not list advanced degrees in molecular biology so, strictly speaking, Anthony Fauci is not a virologist.

In 1984, a full 36 years ago, Fauci hired on with the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID).

There Fauci made a name for himself with the claim that AIDS would ravage the heterosexual community.  That turned out to be wrong; for background, see The Myth of Heterosexual AIDS by Michael Fumento and Inventing the AIDS Virus by Peter Duesberg, who is a molecular biologist.

On Fauci’s watch, NIAID became a major funder of research for what is now known as HIV/AIDS.  Dr. Fauci could often be found testifying before Congress, which is where the money comes from.  Lately, his ability to get things wrong has been on full display.

In January of 2020, Dr. Fauci said it was unclear whether the coronavirus could spread person to person and cited a very low risk to the United States.  Fauci said people need not wear masks and then contended they should.  No more shaking hands, but according to Fauci, it’s okay to have sex with strangers you meet online.

In press conferences, Fauci avoided the most important fact about COVID-19 — the true mortality rate.  Instead, Fauci showed fondness for various “models” of how the virus might spread.  In early April, Fauci said the coronavirus might become “seasonal” with a resurgence later in the year.  On Tuesday, the good doctor held to that line.

“If some areas — cities states or what have you — jump over those barriers, checkpoints and prematurely open up without having the capability of being able to respond effectively and efficiently,” Fauci testified, “my concern is that we will start to see little spikes that might turn into outbreaks.”

So maybe the kids would not be returning to school in fall, and their embattled parents not returning to work.  That brought on the pushback from Rand Paul, who cited varying mortality figures and rejected a singular approach for the entire country.

In his response, Dr. Fauci said it was not his business to address economic concerns.  That comes something as a surprise to the millions now unemployed due to the lockdown approach Fauci advances.

Prophecy and fear-mongering are not science, so Dr. Fauci’s claim to be first and foremost a scientist needs some qualification.  Fauci, 79, is indeed a public health official, but also a politician of sorts.

Dr. Anthony Fauci has held forth at NIAID for 36 years, making decisions that affect millions of people, without once having to face the vote of the people.  If the people thought he should have been shown the door years ago, it would be hard to blame them.

Lloyd Billingsley is a policy fellow at the Independent Institute.

Source:

Deep State Doctor Fauci: Here’s A List Of Mistakes and Lies

Read more: https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2020/05/challenging_anthony_fauci.html#ixzz6UNqRdWng
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook

Fair Use Notice: Images/logos/graphics on this page contains some copyrighted material whose use has not been authorized by the copyright owners. We believe that this not-for-profit, educational, and/or criticism or commentary use on the Web constitutes a fair use of the copyrighted material (as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law).

Doctors for the Truth Speak Out in Madrid, Denounce Covid-19 “False Pandemic”

With the participation of hundreds of professionals from all over the world, “Doctors for the Truth” stated that Covid-19 is a false pandemic created for political purposes. They urged doctors, the media and political authorities to stop the operation, by spreading the truth.

In a context of great excitement and worldwide expectation, the Doctors for Truth Association was presented at a press conference on Saturday, July 25 in Madrid.

The group, led by doctors Natalia Prego Cancelo and Angel Luis Valdepeñas, made a direct connection with the extra-parliamentary commission of doctors from Germany, the Epidemiologists group from Argentina, and doctors from the United States and Argentina.

The event began with the intervention of Heiko Schöning, representative of the German Extra-Parliamentary Commission for the Study of the Coronavirus. There were online interventions by professionals from Argentina and the United States. It concluded with a review of the 4 fundamental points of interpellation to the Government and Spanish authorities by the Association of Doctors for Truth.

The presentation, in an event room of the Madrid Press Palace, was attended by more than 400 people, including general and alternative media, doctors, and assistants. Data, figures, analysis and reflections were exposed that show the incoherent and harmful nature of the measures that are being applied worldwide pertaining to Covid-19.

“A world dictatorship with a sanitary excuse.”

“This is a world dictatorship with a sanitary excuse,” was stressed at the end of the meeting. Doctors agreed that:

  • Coronavirus victims did not outnumber last year’s seasonal flu deaths.
  • Figures were exaggerated by altering medical protocols.
  • The confinement of the healthy and the forced use of masks have no scientific basis.
  • The disease known as Covid-19 does not have a single infectious pattern, but a combination of them.

“There are crossed toxic patterns,” said Angel Luis Valdepeñas. “On the one hand, the electromagnetic contamination of fi5v-ghee, and on the other, the influence of influenza vaccination. There is an interaction and empowerment, which must be investigated”.

Angel Luis Valdepeñas underlined at the end of the meeting:

“We must tell our governments that they NEVER OCCUR to compel us to vaccinate, or even recommend it, for the slightest sense of prudence.”

Valdepeñas concluded his final intervention asking the press for “an effort of responsibility that we have not seen so far”, and criticized the “continuous bombardment of information on the pandemic, without weighing neither the quantity nor the quality of the information”. The doctor indicated that when the media talk about “new outbreaks”, they should clarify that these are only positive tests, but that 98 percent [of the population] are “healthy, asymptomatic people.”

At the end of the event, the panelists took to the streets followed by the numerous attendees to the cry of Freedom!

Together they walked to the Plaza de Callao, the usual meeting place for the 2020 Movement. There they chatted, for more than 2 hours, with attendees and people who had not been able to access the room.

However, this too may get the chop, when the ‘fact-checkers’ decide something here is not in line with Govt. policy.

*

Note to readers: please click the share buttons above or below. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet forums. etc.

This was originally published by Contra información on July 26, 2020. Translated by Mark Taliano

Fair Use Notice: Images/logos/graphics on this page contains some copyrighted material whose use has not been authorized by the copyright owners. We believe that this not-for-profit, educational, and/or criticism or commentary use on the Web constitutes a fair use of the copyrighted material (as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law).

#TrustStamp: Biometric Digital Identity

Huge foreign loans are given to sovereign nations by the World Bank, IMF and the likes. But the conditions that come attached to these loans are seldom told by governments to their citizens. A recent case in Belarus has exposed the conditions laid by these agencies for loans being provided for COVID-19. The President of Belarus has exposed that the World Bank coronavirus aid comes with conditions for imposing extreme lockdown measures, to model their coronavirus response on that of Italy and even changes in the economic policies which he refused as being “unacceptable”.

World Bank Coronavirus Aid Comes With Conditions For Imposing Extreme Lockdown, Reveals Belarus President
EXPOSED: World Bank Coronavirus Aid Comes With Conditions For Imposing Extreme Lockdown, Reveals Belarus President

Additional conditions which do not apply to the financial part are unacceptable for Belarus, Belarus President Aleksandr Lukashenko said when speaking about external lending during a meeting to discuss support measures for the real economic sector on the part of the banking system, reported Belarusian Telegraph Agency, BelTA.

Aleksandr Lukashenko asked the participants of the meeting how things were with the provision of foreign credit assistance to Belarus. “What are our partners’ requirements? It was announced that they can provide Belarus with $940 million in so-called rapid financing. How are things here?” the head of state inquired.

At the same time, he stressed that additional conditions which do not apply to the financial part are unacceptable for the country.

“We hear the demands, for example, to model our coronavirus response on that of Italy. I do not want to see the Italian situation to repeat in Belarus. We have our own country and our own situation,” the president said.

According to the president, the World Bank has showed interest in Belarus’ coronavirus response practices.

“It is ready to fund us ten times more than it offered initially as a token of commendation for our efficient fight against this virus. The World Bank has even asked the Healthcare Ministry to share the experience. Meanwhile, the IMF continues to demand from us quarantine measures, isolation, a curfew. This is nonsense. We will not dance to anyone’s tune,” said the president.

Belarus is one of the only European countries that has not implemented strict coronavirus containment measures. The no-restriction situation is such that even the non-essential services remain open. The football league of Belarus is still being played. The only restriction kind-of step that Belarus took till now is that the school holidays have been extended.

Lukashenko is of the opinion that a complete lockdown was completely unnecessary. Similar, views have been expressed by many renowned scientists as well. Recently, an Indian doctor has debunked the official narrative on Coronavirus. He emphasizes that ‘stress affects health’ and said that fear isn’t necessary because eventually people will develop natural immunity to this virus. He is one of the few people to advocate the opinion that life must continue uninterrupted.

The President of Belarus is not the first one to have exposed the pressure exerted by global agencies amidst the coronavirus crisis to further their agenda. Earlier, in a shocking development the President of Madagascar made a sensational claim that the WHO offered him $20m bribe to poison COVID-19 cure called COVID-19 Organics made from Artemisia.

The Tanzanian President kicked out WHO from the country after Goat and Papaya samples came COVID-19 positive. Days after the Tanzanian move, Burundi also kicked out WHO Coronavirus Team from the country for interference in internal matters.

It was also revealed in an intercepted human intelligence report that Bill Gates offered $10 million bribe for a forced Coronavirus vaccination program in Nigeria. After which, an Italian politician demanded the arrest of Bill Gates in the Italian parliament. She also exposed Bill Gates’ agenda in India and Africa, along with the plans to chip the human race through the digital identification program ID2020.

Source:

EXPOSED: World Bank Coronavirus Aid Comes With Conditions For Imposing Extreme Lockdown, Reveals Belarus President

Fair Use Notice: Images/logos/graphics on this page contains some copyrighted material whose use has not been authorized by the copyright owners. We believe that this not-for-profit, educational, and/or criticism or commentary use on the Web constitutes a fair use of the copyrighted material (as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law).

Make History. Destroy Fake Science

On 14 May, 2020, I personally delivered your and others 100k+ signatures to the President. I received a phone call from the White House and shared all the lies and fraud of Fauci.

I’ve called a debate on July 29th with Fauci at MIT Kendall Square at 12 noon. Our #FireFauci campaign, which WE unleashed – has had a massive impact to awaken the world on Fake Science.

We have less than 35 days to WIN the US SENATE Primary in MA, and we MUST WIN. Our winning will be the equivalent of a nuke going off on the #DeepState, whose headquarters is Massachusetts.

We need to raise $500,000 in the next 5 days to purchase media advertising on TV and RADIO. If each of you donate just $10, we can achieve our goal. Please note, you must be a US resident to donate.

It’s time we move beyond black and white, left and right and unite to WIN Truth Freedom Health.

Make history, destroy fake science.

Be the Light,
Dr.SHIVA

Fair Use Notice: Images/logos/graphics on this page contains some copyrighted material whose use has not been authorized by the copyright owners. We believe that this not-for-profit, educational, and/or criticism or commentary use on the Web constitutes a fair use of the copyrighted material (as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law).fa

RFK JR. DISHES ON DEBATE & CURRENT CENSORSHIP

RFK JR. DISHES ON DEBATE & CURRENT CENSORSHIP HW Special Report: RFK Jr. discusses how his recent debate with Alan Dershowitz on mandatory vaccines struck a chord with yesterday’s censored “Frontline Doctors.”

Fair Use Notice: Images/logos/graphics on this page contains some copyrighted material whose use has not been authorized by the copyright owners. We believe that this not-for-profit, educational, and/or criticism or commentary use on the Web constitutes a fair use of the copyrighted material (as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law).

Why Everyone Was Wrong – CoronaVirus Sars-CoV-2

Absent in the mainstream news is the report from Swiss magazine Die Weltwoche (World Week) published by Dr. Beda M. Stadler, former Director of the Institute for Immunology at the University of Bern in Switzerland, titled, “Why Everyone Is/Was Wrong About the Coronavirus.” Dr. Stadler concludes the vast majority of virologists and epidemiologists have been making erroneous statements since the coronavirus first hit and admits to also making the same incorrect assumptions at first.

A key point in the article is to counter the widely promoted claim that what makes COVID-19 so frightening is as a novel virus, humans have no natural immunity to it. As Dr. Stadler points out:

“Even Anthony Fauci, the most important advisor to the Trump administration, noted at the beginning at every public appearance that the danger of the virus lay in the fact that there was no immunity against it.
Tony and I often sat next to each other at immunology seminars at the National Institute of Health in Bethesda in the US, because we worked in related fields back then. So, for a while I was pretty uncritical of his statements, since he was a respectable colleague of mine.”

Dr. Stadler followed with the fact, “In reality, nobody had a test ready to prove such a statement. That wasn’t science, but pure speculation based on a gut feeling that was then parroted by everyone.”

The “scaremongers” he points out are alarmist doctors, media who constantly put out fear-inducing images and statements, and federal officials who keep insisting on imposing tracing apps, even though they will never work given the ignorance surrounding what it is actually measured in any effective way.

########################################

Note: The original article was published in the Swiss magazine Weltwoche (World Week) on June 10th. The author, Beda M Stadler is the former director of the Institute for Immunology at the University of Bern, a biologist and professor emeritus. Stadler is an important medical professional in Switzerland, he also likes to use provoking language, which should not deter you from the points he makes.

This article is about Switzerland and it does not suggest that the situation is exactly the same globally. I suggest to read to the end, because Stadler makes crucial points about testing for Sars-CoV-2. This is an opinion piece adopted from Medium.com and it does not necessarily reflect that of WHN, this is merely a look at the current situation via a perspective/outlook different from what is being portrayed in the media. Regardless of whether it is correct or not, it does make some good points, and it is, at the very least, a thought provoking interesting read.

Coronavirus: Why everyone was wrong

~The coronavirus is slowly retreating. What actually happened in the past few weeks? The experts have missed basic connections. The immune response against the virus is much stronger than we thought.

Written by: Beda M. Stadler

This is not an accusation, but a ruthless taking stock [of the current situation]. I could slap myself, because I looked at Sars-CoV2- way too long with panic. I am also somewhat annoyed with many of my immunology colleagues who so far have left the discussion about Covid-19 to virologists and epidemiologists. I feel it is time to criticize some of the main and completely wrong public statements about this virus.

Firstly, it was wrong to claim that this virus was novel. Secondly, It was even more wrong to claim that the population would not already have some immunity against this virus. Thirdly, it was the crowning of stupidity to claim that someone could have Covid-19 without any symptoms at all or even to pass the disease along without showing any symptoms whatsoever.

But let’s look at this one by one.

1. A new virus?

At the end of 2019 a coronavirus, which was considered novel, was detected in China. When the gene sequence, i.e. the blueprint of this virus, was identified and was given a similar name to the 2002 identified Sars, i.e. Sars-CoV-2, we should have already asked ourselves then how far [this virus] is related to other coronaviri, which can make human beings sick. But no, instead we discussed from which animal as part of a Chinese menu the virus might have sprung. In the meantime, however, many more people believe the Chinese were so stupid as to release this virus upon themselves in their own country. Now that we’re talking about developing a vaccine against the virus, we suddenly see studies which show that this so-called novel virus is very strongly related to Sars-1 as well as other beta-coronaviri which make us suffer every year in the form of a colds. Apart from the pure homologies in the sequence between the various coronaviri which can make people sick, [scientists] currently work on identifying a number of areas on the virus in the same way as human immune cells identify them. This is no longer about the genetic relationship, but about how our immune system sees this virus, i.e. which parts of other coronaviri could potentially be used in a vaccine.

So: Sars-Cov-2 isn’t all that new, but merely a seasonal cold virus that mutated and disappears in summer, as all cold viri do — which is what we’re observing globally right now. Flu viri mutate significantly more, by the way, and nobody would ever claim that a new flu virus strain was completely novel. Many veterinary doctors were therefore annoyed by this claim of novelty, as they have been vaccinating cats, dogs, pigs, and cows for years against coronaviri.

2. The fairy tale of no immunity

From the World Health Organisation (WHO) to every Facebook-virologist, everyone claimed this virus was particularly dangerous, because there was no immunity against it, because it was a novel virus. Even Anthony Fauci, the most important advisor to the Trump administration noted at the beginning at every public appearance that the danger of the virus lay in the fact that there was no immunity against it. Tony and I often sat next to each other at immunology seminars at the National Institute of Health in Bethesda in the US, because we worked in related fields back then. So for a while I was pretty uncritical of his statements, since he was a respectable colleague of mine. The penny dropped only when I realized that the first commercially available antibody test [for Sars-CoV-2] was put together from an old antibody test that was meant to detect Sars-1. This kind of test evaluates if there are antibodies in someone’s blood and if they came about through an early fight against the virus. [Scientists] even extracted antibodies from a Lama that would detect Sars-1, Sars-CoV-2, and even the Mers virus. It also became known that Sars-CoV-2 had a less significant impact in areas in China where Sars-1 had previously raged. This is clear evidence urgently suggesting that our immune system considers Sars-1 and Sars-Cov-2 at least partially identical and that one virus could probably protect us from the other.

That’s when I realized that the entire world simply claimed that there was no immunity, but in reality, nobody had a test ready to prove such a statement. That wasn’t science, but pure speculation based on a gut feeling that was then parroted by everyone. To this day there isn’t a single antibody test that can describe all possible immunological situations, such as: if someone is immune, since when, what the neutralizing antibodies are targeting and how many structures exist on other coronaviri that can equally lead to immunity.

In mid-April work was published by the group of Andreas Thiel at the Charité Berlin. A paper with 30 authors, amongst them the virologist Christian Drosten. It showed that in 34% of people in Berlin who had never been in contact with the Sars-CoV-2 virus showed nonetheless T-cell immunity against it (T-cell immunity is a different kind of immune reaction, see below). This means that our T-cells, i.e. white blood cells, detect common structures appearing on Sars-CoV-2 and regular cold viri and therefore combat both of them.

A study by John P A Ioannidis of Stanford University — according to the Einstein Foundation in Berlin one of the world’s ten most cited scientists — showed that immunity against Sars-Cov-2, measured in the form of antibodies, is much higher than previously thought. Ioannidis is certainly not a conspiracy theorist who just wants to swim against the stream; nonetheless he is now being criticized, because the antibody tests used were not extremely precise. With that, his critics admit that they do not have such tests yet. And aside, John P A Ioannidis is such a scientific heavy-weight that all German virologists combined are light-weight in comparison.

3. The failure of modellers

Epidemiologists also fell for the myth that there was no immunity in the population. They also didn’t want to believe that coronaviri were seasonal cold viri that would disappear in summer. Otherwise their curve models would have looked differently. When the initial worst case scenarios didn’t come true anywhere, some now still cling to models predicting a second wave. Let’s leave them their hopes — I’ve never seen a scientific branch that manoeuvred itself so much into the offside. I have also not yet understood why epidemiologists were so much more interested in the number of deaths, rather than in the numbers that could be saved.

4. Immunology of common sense

As an immunologist I trust a biological model, namely that of the human organism, which has built a tried and tested, adaptive immune system. At the end of February, driving home from the recording of [a Swiss political TV debate show], I mentioned to Daniel Koch [former head of the Swiss federal section “Communicable Diseases” of the Federal Office of Public Health] that I suspected there was a general immunity in the population against Sars-Cov-2. He argued against my view. I later defended him anyway, when he said that children were not a driving factor in the spread of the pandemic. He suspected that children didn’t have a receptor for the virus, which is of course nonsense. Still, we had to admit that his observations were correct. But the fact that every scientist attacked him afterwards and asked for studies to prove his point, was somewhat ironic. Nobody asked for studies to prove that people in certain at-risk groups were dying. When the first statistics from China and later worldwide data showed the same trend, that is to say that almost no children under ten years old got sick, everyone should have made the argument that children clearly have to be immune. For every other disease that doesn’t afflict a certain group of people, we would come to the conclusion that that group is immune. When people are sadly dying in a retirement home, but in the same place other pensioners with the same risk factors are left entirely unharmed, we should also conclude that they were presumably immune.

But this common sense seems to have eluded many, let’s call them “immunity deniers” just for fun. This new breed of deniers had to observe that the majority of people who tested positive for this virus, i.e. the virus was present in their throats, did not get sick. The term “silent carriers” was conjured out of a hat and it was claimed that one could be sick without having symptoms. Wouldn’t that be something! If this principle from now on gets naturalized into the realm of medicine, health insurers would really have a problem, but also teachers whose students could now claim to have whatever disease to skip school, if at the end of the day one didn’t need symptoms anymore to be sick.

The next joke that some virologists shared was the claim that those who were sick without symptoms could still spread the virus to other people. The “healthy” sick would have so much of the virus in their throats that a normal conversation between two people would be enough for the “healthy one” to infect the other healthy one. At this point we have to dissect what is happening here: If a virus is growing anywhere in the body, also in the throat, it means that human cells decease. When [human] cells decease, the immune system is alerted immediately and an infection is caused. One of five cardinal symptoms of an infection is pain. It is understandable that those afflicted by Covid-19 might not remember that initial scratchy throat and then go on to claim that they didn’t have any symptoms just a few days ago. But for doctors and virologists to twist this into a story of “healthy” sick people, which stokes panic and was often given as a reason for stricter lock down measures, just shows how bad the joke really is. At least the WHO didn’t accept the claim of asymptomatic infections and even challenged this claim on its website.

Here is a succinct and brief summary, especially for the immunity deniers, of how humans are attacked by germs and how we react to them: If there are pathogenic viri in our environment, then all humans — whether immune or not — are attacked by this virus. If someone is immune, the battle with the virus begins. First we try to prevent the virus from binding to our own cells with the help of antibodies. This normally works only partially, not all are blocked and some viri will attach to the appropriate cells. That doesn’t need to lead to symptoms, but it’s also not a disease. Because the second guard of the immune system is now called into action. That’s the above mentioned T-cells, white blood cells, which can determine from the outside in which other cells the virus is now hiding to multiply. These cells, which are now incubating the virus, are searched throughout the entire body and killed by the T-cells until the last virus is dead.

So if we do a PCR corona test on an immune person, it is not a virus that is detected, but a small shattered part of the viral genome. The test comes back positive for as long as there are tiny shattered parts of the virus left. Correct: Even if the infectious viri are long dead, a corona test can come back positive, because the PCR method multiplies even a tiny fraction of the viral genetic material enough [to be detected]. That’s exactly what happened, when there was the global news, even shared by the WHO, that 200 Koreans who already went through Covid-19 were infected a second time and that there was therefore probably no immunity against this virus. The explanation of what really happened and an apology came only later, when it was clear that the immune Koreans were perfectly healthy and only had a short battle with the virus. The crux was that the virus debris registered with the overly sensitive test and therefore came back as “positive”. It is likely that a large number of the daily reported infection numbers are purely due to viral debris.

The PCR test with its extreme sensitivity was initially perfect to find out where the virus could be. But this test can not identify whether the virus is still alive, i.e. still infectious. Unfortunately, this also led some virologists to equate the strength of a test result with viral load, i.e. the amount of virus someone can breathe out. Luckily, our day care centres stayed open nonetheless. Since German virologists missed that part, because, out of principle, they do not look at what other countries are doing, even if other countries’ case numbers are falling more rapidly.

5. The problem with corona immunity

What does this all mean in real life? The extremely long incubation time of two to 14 days — and reports of 22 to 27 days — should wake up any immunologist. As well as the claim that most patients would no longer secrete the virus after five days. Both [claims] in turn actually lead to the conclusion that there is — sort of in the background — a base immunity that contorts the events, compared to an expected cycle [of a viral infection] — i.e. leads to a long incubation period and quick immunity. This immunity also seems to be the problem for patients with a severe course of the disease. Our antibody titre, i.e. the accuracy of our defense system, is reduced the older we get. But also people with a bad diet or who are malnourished may have a weakened immune system, which is why this virus does not only reveal the medical problems of a country, but also social issues.

If an infected person does not have enough antibodies, i.e. a weak immune response, the virus slowly spreads out across the entire body. Now that there are not enough antibodies, there is only the second, supporting leg of our immune response left: The T-cells begin to attack the virus-infested cells all over the body. This can lead to an exaggerated immune response, basically to a massive slaughter; this is called a Cytokine Storm. Very rarely this can also happen in small children, in that case called Kawasaki Syndrome. This very rare occurrence in children was also used in our country to stoke panic. It’s interesting, however, that this syndrome is very easily cured. The [affected] children get antibodies from healthy blood donors, i.e. people who went through coronavirus colds. This means that the hushed-up [supposedly non-existent] immunity in the population is in fact used therapeutically.

What now?

The virus is gone for now. It will probably come back in winter, but it won’t be a second wave, but just a cold. Those young and healthy people who currently walk around with a mask on their faces would be better off wearing a helmet instead, because the risk of something falling on their head is greater than that of getting a serious case of Covid-19.

If we observe a significant rise in infections in 14 days [after the Swiss relaxed the lock down], we’d at least know that one of the measures was useful. Other than that I recommend reading John P A Ioannidis’ latest work in which he describes the global situation based on data on May 1st 2020: People below 65 years old make up only 0.6 to 2.6 % of all fatal Covid cases. To get on top of the pandemic, we need a strategy merely concentrating on the protection of at-risk people over 65. If that’s the opinion of a top expert, a second lock down is simply a no-go.

On our way back to normal, it would be good for us citizens if a few scaremongers apologized. Such as doctors who wanted a triage of over 80 year old Covid patients in order to stop ventilating them. Also the media that kept showing alarmist videos of Italian hospitals to illustrate a situation that as such didn’t exist. All politicians calling for “testing, testing, testing” without even knowing what the test actually measures. And the federal government for an app they’ll never get to work and will warn me if someone near me is positive, even if they’re not infectious.

In winter, when the flu and other colds make the rounds again, we can then go back to kissing each other a little less, and we should wash our hands even without a virus present. And people who’ll get sick nonetheless can then don their masks to show others what they have learned from this pandemic. And if we still haven’t learned to protect our at-risk groups, we’ll have to wait for a vaccine that will hopefully also be effective in at-risk people.

Gerald Celente

https://www.worldhealth.net/news/why-everyone-was-wrong/

https://www.weltwoche.ch/ausgaben/2020-24/inland/warum-alle-falsch-lagen-die-weltwoche-ausgabe-24-2020.html

Fair Use Notice: Images/logos/graphics on this page contains some copyrighted material whose use has not been authorized by the copyright owners. We believe that this not-for-profit, educational, and/or criticism or commentary use on the Web constitutes a fair use of the copyrighted material (as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law).

#ExposeBillGates AND Gates Questioned on Vaccines!

By Derrick Broze

The Conscious Resistance Network and a coalition of alternative/indy media outlets present:

#ExposeBillGates International Day of Action on August 8, 2020! Do what you can to spread the truth about Gates’ control agenda.

This is the moment Gates made it his life’s goal to depopulate the Earth.

Source:

Image: Spiro Skouras

#ExposeBillGates Day of Action 2, AND Gates Questioned on Vaccines!

Fair Use Notice: Images/logos/graphics on this page contains some copyrighted material whose use has not been authorized by the copyright owners. We believe that this not-for-profit, educational, and/or criticism or commentary use on the Web constitutes a fair use of the copyrighted material (as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law).

FATHER OF ANTI-VACCINE MOVEMENT STRIKES AGAIN

Dr. Andrew Wakefield, joins Del to discuss his new bombshell film, “1986: The Act,” an in-depth forensic examination of the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act and its consequences that will indeed carry over into the “warp speed” Covid-19 vaccine on the horizon.

1986: The Act

 

https://youtu.be/hU1f7t3CTh4

The Corbett Report: https://www.corbettreport.com/lies-damned-lies-and-coronavirus-statistics/

https://www.corbettreport.com/lies-damned-lies-and-global-warming-statistics/

Fall of the Cabal Full Documentary by Janet Ossebaard — Truth is Getting Out

https://youtu.be/anC7k3am5RI

Out of Shadows – outofshadows.org

The Out of The Shadows documentary lifts the mask on how the mainstream media & Hollywood manipulate & control the masses by spreading propaganda throughout their content.

 Our goal is to wake up the general public by shedding light on how we all have been lied to & brainwashed by a hidden enemy with a sinister agenda.

This project is the result of two years of blood, sweat, and tears by a team of woke professionals. It’s been independently produced and funded and is available on many different platforms for free for anyone to watch.

Patriots made this documentary with the sole purpose of getting the truth out there. If you like the documentary, please share this video.

You can support our team and future projects making a donation at outofshadows.org

Fair Use Notice: Images/logos/graphics on this page contains some copyrighted material whose use has not been authorized by the copyright owners. We believe that this not-for-profit, educational, and/or criticism or commentary use on the Web constitutes a fair use of the copyrighted material (as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law).

FAUCI’S QUESTIONABLE PRIORITIES AND CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The rapidity with which normal life has ground to a halt as a result of coronavirus-related edicts has stunned citizens around the world, generating massive social and economic upheaval. Meanwhile, media coverage of COVID-19 has whipped up unprecedented levels of public anxiety and fear, laying the psychological groundwork for people to eagerly embrace “magic bullet” medical solutions, no matter how experimental. In the U.S., the World Health Organization (WHO) is now compounding the domestic panic, warning that America could become the new coronavirus “epicenter.”

Across the country, a debate is raging about the nation’s medical response and how best to apportion available resources. Many argue, quite reasonably, for the importance of identifying safe, effective and affordable therapies that can provide immediate help to those who are sick. On March 22, The New York Times reported that there are at least 69 existing drugs or compounds that might be effective in treating the coronavirus. In China, researchers are studying intravenous vitamin C as a potential nontoxic treatment, while a paper published by French researchers on March 20 described promising COVID-19 results from the off-label use of hydroxychloroquine (an antimalarial) and azithromycin (an antibiotic).

The head of the French team, Didier Raoult, MD, PhD, is one of the world’s top infectious disease and virology experts, with roughly 2,000 peer-reviewed publications and multiple awards to his name. Raoult and coauthors point out that a major advantage of “repositioning” older drugs for this coronavirus is that their safety profile, side effects, dosing and drug interactions are already well documented. However, Ian Lipkin, MD, of Columbia University recently told MSNBC, with a grin, that investments tend to go toward treatments that are “sexy and new and patentable” rather than to “tried-and-true, classical sort of methods repurposing drugs and strategies that have already been shown to work.”

Fauci’s tired rhetoric

For biopharma companies that are poised to profit from COVID-19-related misfortune, older drugs that have outlived their patent terms are not terribly helpful for the bottom line. Could this be why leading White House coronavirus advisor Anthony Fauci, MD, long-time head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), recently pooh-poohed the published chloroquine evidence as merely “anecdotal”? Fauci is a stalwart enthusiast of “patentable” vaccines, skilled in attracting massive government funding for vaccines that either never materialize or are spectacularly ineffective or unsafe.

For example, Fauci once shilled for the fast-tracked H1N1 influenza (“swine flu”) vaccine on YouTube, reassuring viewers in 2009 that serious adverse events were “very, very, very rare.” Shortly thereafter, the vaccine went on to wreak havoc in multiple countries, increasing miscarriage risks in pregnant women in the U.S., provoking a spike in adolescent narcolepsy in Scandinavia and causing febrile convulsions in one in every 110 vaccinated children in Australia—prompting the latter to suspend its influenza vaccination program in under-fives.

In 2010, then-Senator and physician Tom Coburn, MD, called out Fauci for misleadingly touting “significant progress in HIV vaccine research.” Coburn stated , “The study [Fauci] referred to was a clinical trial in Thailand finding a vaccine to be 31% effective at preventing HIV infection. Unfortunately, the results of this study have been found to be statistically insignificant and the findings of the study have received much skepticism. [. . .] Most scientists involved in AIDS research believe that an HIV vaccine is further away than ever . . . and may never be possible. . . .” Senator Coburn also noted that Fauci’s agency had spent over $5.2 million over a four-year period on lavish “HIV vaccine awareness” events.

Without the least hint of embarrassment, however, Fauci reappeared on YouTube in 2016 to once again push his HIV vaccine agenda, even citing the unimpressive Thailand trial. Fauci’s mobilization of billions for a never-completed Zika vaccine followed a similar playbook. And now, Fauci is predictably shining a spotlight on risky and uncertain coronavirus vaccines that may not be available for two years, rather than prioritizing the short-term therapies that patients need right now….

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/dr-fauci-and-covid-19-priorities-therapeutics-now-or-vaccines-later/

 

Serious concerns arise with Dr. Anthony Fauci and his connections to Gilead Sciences drug Remdesivir, and the VA study that stated hydroxychloroquine was “ineffective.” Is Dr. Fauci compromised? There are many questions that NEED to be answered! Link to full response for VA study by Dr. Didier Raoult: https://www.mediterranee-infection.co…

Source:

Fauci’s questionable priorities and conflicts of interest

Fair Use Notice: Images/logos/graphics on this page contains some copyrighted material whose use has not been authorized by the copyright owners. We believe that this not-for-profit, educational, and/or criticism or commentary use on the Web constitutes a fair use of the copyrighted material (as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law).

How Everyone Will Test Positive

A recent scientific paper explains how “FIVE GRAIN” creates Kuvid like structures within human cells.

Fair Use Notice: Images/logos/graphics on this page contains some copyrighted material whose use has not been authorized by the copyright owners. We believe that this not-for-profit, educational, and/or criticism or commentary use on the Web constitutes a fair use of the copyrighted material (as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law).

Operation Lockstep

– From the Rockefeller playbook –

 

1st Phase: Create and release a super contagious but low-mortality rate virus. Have the media cause mass hysteria about it by blowing death counts out of proportion by falsifying death certificates, by using pre-contaminated test-kits, double-counting/testing, and classifying most nonrelated deaths as COVID-19. A lockdown (total of about 3 months slowly extended over time in multiple intervals) will condition the population to live under draconian measures/restrictions and repeatedly echo that a vaccine is needed. Actively suppress protests and isolate instigators with severe financial/judicial penalties. Keep up the quarantine as long as possible to destroy the region’s economy, break down the supply chain to cause food shortages, civil unrest and more protests. Eventually, end Phase 1 lockdown when public push-back is increasing. Clearly state on MSM that ending this lockdown might be too early but allow it anyways.

 

 

2nd Phase: The lockdown, fear, and social distancing will steadily compromise the population’s immune system, amplified by wearing masks, longer wifi/5G exposure indoors, by diminished exposure to sunlight, fresh air, healthy bacteria and the absence of intimacy and healthy food supplies. When people re-emerge into society more people will fall ill, which will be blamed on COVID-19 and again be emphasized by MSM. Bring up the potential need for a second lockdown, backed-up by overhyped numbers of infection towards august 2020. This will all occur before the vaccination is ready, to justify it. Around October-November a longer (6+ months) and more potent lockdown will follow until everyone takes the vaccine. This time penalties for civil disobedience are increased and fines are replaced with jail-time. Blame the protesters for the second wave. Set up more check-points with military assistance, introduce mandatory Track&Trace apps, and take control over food-/gas supplies and services to which civilians now need permission to access. Keep extending the lockdown, degrading the supply chain, and amplify food shortages. Quell any public outrage using extreme action and force and single out opposition leaders as public enemy number one. Roll out large scale vaccination programs and make health certification mandatory and a prerequisite for entering the new normal. The minority that defies the agenda will be denied access to work or supplies and not be allowed to travel.

 

 

3rd Phase: In case the majority of people resist the vaccine, a weaponized SARS/HIV/MERS virus will be released with a 30%+ higher mortality rate than COVID-19 and again be blamed on protesters. This will be the ultimate push for everyone to accept the vaccination and the rules within the new system. A cryptocurrency system (International Patent: wo/2020/060606) will be implemented in combination with digital ID2020 monitoring body activity, human behavior, and willingness to submit using food/shelter/water as a weapon of enforcement in the new economic system. Basically: do what we want and get rewarded with credits and obtain privileges or go against the system and get penalized and lose access to necessary means to survive.

PS: This is just their plan; the outcome is 100% up to us…

 

**********************************************

from Norbert Häring

Ten years ago, the Rockefeller Foundation published the eerily prescient, autocratic Lock-Step-Scenario and, apparently, has been working to make it true. The most recent initiative in this regard is a cooperation of the Rockefeller-funded GAVI immunization alliance with Mastercard and a biometric ID company named TrustStamp.

Before getting to this cooperation, let me briefly remind you of a selection of the assumptions of the Lock Step scenario builders have made their choices 10 years ago:

  • A virus pandemic with high contagion and high mortality
  • Non-authoritarian response of US-government fails
  • Authoritarian Chinese approach works much better
  • Other nations emulate authoritarian, high surveillance Chinese approach
  • Endurance of more authoritarian rule after pandemic
  • Shocked populations welcoming more surveillance
  • … and authoritarian rule
  • Biometric ID gets a boost
  • A multipolar IT-world with US-dominance emerging
  • Philanthropic foundations becoming part of US external and security policy.

Let me also remind you, that the Rockefeller Foundation has provided the seed funding in 2017 for ID2020, an initiative to get every world citizen a unified biometric identity by 2030. Partners are Microsoft, the immunization alliance GAVI and Accenture. Accenture recently featured on this blog as creator – for the World Economic Forum – of the total-control dystopia The Known Traveller Digital Identity Project.

With this in mind, I would like to draw your attention to the following recent article of Raul Diego of MintPress News:

Africa to Become Testing Ground for “Trust Stamp” Vaccine Record and Payment System

By Paul Diego. A biometric digital identity platform that “evolves just as you evolve” is set to be introduced in “low-income, remote communities” in West Africa thanks to a public-private partnership between the Bill Gates-backed GAVI vaccine alliance, Mastercard and the AI-powered “identity authentication” company, Trust Stamp.

The program, which was first launched in late 2018, will see Trust Stamp’s digital identity platform integrated into the GAVI-Mastercard “Wellness Pass,” a digital vaccination record and identity system that is also linked to Mastercard’s click-to-play system that powered by its AI and machine learning technology called NuData. Mastercard, in addition to professing its commitment to promoting “centralized record keeping of childhood immunization” also describes itself as a leader toward a “World Beyond Cash,” and its partnership with GAVI marks a novel approach towards linking a biometric digital identity system, vaccination records, and a payment system into a single cohesive platform. The effort, since its launch nearly two years ago, has been funded via $3.8 million in GAVI donor funds in addition to a matched donation of the same amount by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

In early June, GAVI reported that Mastercard’s Wellness Pass program would be adapted in response to the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. Around a month later, Mastercard announced that Trust Stamp’s biometric identity platform would be integrated into Wellness Pass as Trust Stamp’s system is capable of providing biometric identity in areas of the world lacking internet access or cellular connectivity and also does not require knowledge of an individual’s legal name or identity to function. The Wellness Program involving GAVI, Mastercard, and Trust Stamp will soon be launched in West Africa and will be coupled with a Covid-19 vaccination program once a vaccine becomes available.

The push to implement biometrics as part of national ID registration systems has been ongoing for many years on the continent and has become a highly politicized issue in several African countries. Opposition to similar projects in Africa often revolves around the costs surrounding them, such as the biometric voter management system that the Electoral Commission of Ghana has been trying to implement ahead of their 2020 general election in December. Bright Simons, honorary VP of the IMANI policy think tank, has questioned the “budgetary allocation” for the new system, claiming that the “unnecessary registration of 17 million people all over again” represents millions of dollars “being blown for reasons that nobody can explain in this country.”

Masking ulterior motives

Trust Stamp’s biometric identity system, largely funded by Mastercard’s massive investment in the company in February, utilizes a technology it calls Evergreen Hash that creates an AI-generated “3D mask” based on a single photo of a person’s face, palm or fingerprint. Once this “mask” is created, much of the original data is discarded and encryption keys are created in place of a person’s name or other more traditional identifiers.

“Only a small percentage of the data that originally existed is in the hash,” Trust Stamp CEO Gareth Genner has stated. “What you have is something safer for storing because it can’t be used to directly identify you. No one would recognize you in this huge jumble of numbers.” The result, according to Genner, is an “irreversible non-personally identifiable information” system that “protects privacy, reduces potential for misuse and allows effective inclusion when there is no other form of legal record.”

Genner also explained in a recent press release that the unique “hash” is capable of “evolving” as a new hash with updated health information is created every time a child or individual gets a vaccine. Trust Stamp’s AI algorithms can accurately determine if different hashes belong to the same individual, meaning that “the hash evolves over time just as you evolve,” said Genner.

It is unclear how much the Wellness Pass initiative is motivated by public health concerns as opposed to free market considerations. Indeed, the GAVI alliance, largely funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates and Rockefeller Foundations, as well as allied governments and the vaccine industry, is principally concerned with improving “the health of markets for vaccines and other immunization products,” rather than the health of individuals, according to its own website. Similarly, Mastercard’s GAVI partnership is directly linked to its “World Beyond Cash” effort, which mainly bolsters its business model that has long depended on a reduction in the use of physical cash.

Dual use tyranny

Trust Stamp also shares this market-focused vision for its digital identity system as the company has stated that it is looking for new commercialization options for its Evergreen Hash technology, specifically with prison systems. Talks with private and public prison systems have revealed an interest in their utilization of Trust Stamp’s technology to provide identification for individuals on parole “without making them pay for pricey ankle bracelets that monitor their every move,” as Trust Stamp’s platform would ostensibly provide that same function but in a “touchless” and less expensive manner.

Trust Stamp’s interest in providing its technology to both COVID-19 response and to law enforcement is part of a growing trend where numerous companies providing digital solutions to  COVID-19 also offer the same solutions to prison systems and law enforcement for the purposes of surveillance and “predictive policing.”

For instance, contact tracing software originally introduced as part of the COVID-19 response has since been used by police departments across the U.S. to track protesters during the country’s recent bouts of protests and civil unrest. Similarly, a controversial Israeli tech firm currently being used in Rhode Island offers AI-powered predictive analytic to identify likely future COVID-19 hotspots and individuals likely to contract COVID-19 in the future, while also offering governments the ability to predict future locations of and participants in riots and civil unrest.

What is perhaps most alarming about this new “Wellness Pass” initiative, is that it links these “dual use” digital solutions to cashless payment solutions that could soon become mandated as anything over than touchless, cashless, methods of payment have been treated as potential modes for contagion by GAVI-aligned groups like the World Health Organization, among others, since the pandemic was first declared earlier this year.

This article was published on July 10, 2020 by MintPressRaul Diego is a MintPress News Staff Writer, independent photojournalist, researcher, writer and documentary filmmaker. MintPress News is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 International License.

Source:

https://rwer.wordpress.com/2020/07/13/rockefeller-foundation-keeps-working-on-their-autocratic-lock-step-scenario/

Fair Use Notice: Images/logos/graphics on this page contains some copyrighted material whose use has not been authorized by the copyright owners. We believe that this not-for-profit, educational, and/or criticism or commentary use on the Web constitutes a fair use of the copyrighted material (as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law).

HEALTH “EXPERT” HYPOCRITES CAN’T BE TRUSTED

Brainwashed by media and politicians that we must believe the flacks and hacks they elevate and feature as “top experts” in the field, be it the scores of military wars they lie us into or the COVID War they launched, their hypocrisy and bias are clearly evidenced in the 11 July New York Times article “Experts Feel Torn on Dangers of Different Protests.”

Indeed, the world is in danger when physicians and health officials openly reveal their scientific insights into the virus pandemic depend on their political opinions, states Gerald Celente.

On 30 May, 300 epidemiologists and public health officials signed a letter supporting those protesting the murder of George Floyd by a policeman in
Minneapolis… despite their previous, dire warnings of the risk of the virus spreading if people gathered in large numbers at close quarters.

In part, their letter stated, “As public health advocates, we do not condemn these gatherings [the Floyd protests] as risky for COVID-19 transmission. We
support them as vital to the national public health.”

These are the same epidemiologist hypocrites who publicly had condemned protests in Michigan, Ohio, and additional states against the shelter-in-place
draconian lockdowns, claiming the mass gathering endangered public health by risking the spread of the coronavirus.

Facts don’t matter!

As evidenced by the pure hypocrisy of mainstream media’s so-called “public health” experts, their diagnoses are politically corrupt.

Source

Gerald Celente Trends

Fair Use Notice: Images/logos/graphics on this page contains some copyrighted material whose use has not been authorized by the copyright owners. We believe that this not-for-profit, educational, and/or criticism or commentary use on the Web constitutes a fair use of the copyrighted material (as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law).

Urgent information on Covid Vacc!ne

Dr Carrie Madej, an Internal Medicine Specialist claims that the V@ccine Could Be Trojan Horse To Patent Humans as it will change your DNA. She is an Internal Medicine Specialist in McDonough, GA and has over 19 years of experience in the medical field. She graduated from Kansas City Univ Of Medicine Bioscience College Of Osteopathic Medicine medical school in 2001.

Vaccine Information on Covid19, nanotechnology, smart phone health apps, rDNA, rRNA, patenting GMO

My last vaccine was the flu shot back in 2010. I had such an allergic reaction they are surprised I did not die. I will never ever have another vaccine no matter what they say.

https://www.theverge.com/2019/7/16/20… https://vaccine.guide https://www.sciencealert.com/an-invis… https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pin… https://www.ageofautism.com/2016/06/w… https://images.app.goo.gl/vupvXgtfp8a… https://healthimpactnews.com/2020/bil…

Recombinant DNA (rDNA) molecules are DNA molecules formed by laboratory methods of genetic recombination (such as molecular cloning) to bring together genetic material from multiple sources, creating sequences that would not otherwise be found in the genome. Immortalized cells (also called continuous cells or cell lines) are primary cells whose telomeres and/or tumour suppressor genes have been altered. Tumour suppressor genes (e.g. p53 and Rb) are important for signalling the cell to stop dividing when the likelihood of DNA damage is higher (i.e. after multiple cell cycles, read more about the cell cycle on our knowledge base). In the case of immortalized cells, these genes have been knocked down or their function inhibited so that the cell is able to keep dividing indefinitely. 

NVIC.org information on vaccines https://www.corvelva.it/en/component/….

Site for Italian report on vaccines https://youtu.be/hTTlT7CWRLQ

hydrogel nanobots https://youtu.be/jzOeY2DVHyE

DARPA video on hydrogel biosensors https://ghr.nlm.nih.gov/primer/testin…

Discusses the law of naturally occurring genes cannot be patented; however, synthetic/Modified genes can be patented

How can you test positive for something that has not been isolated? The RT-PCR is a manufacturing technique to replicate DNA billions of times, NOT a test to diagnose for viruses as the Nobel Peace Prize winner Ph.D Karry Mullis made clear and thus this supposed “TEST” is 100% false positive not 50%.= “The reason is that the intended use of the PCR was, and still is, to apply it as a manufacturing technique, being able to replicate DNA sequences millions and billions of times, and not as a diagnostic tool to detect viruses.” Jun 27, 2020 COVID19 “PCR Tests are Scientifically Meaningless” off-guardian DOT org/2020/06/27/covid19-pcr-tests-are-scientifically-meaningless/
“Masks Don’t Work A review of science relevant to COVID-19 social policy” by D.G. Rancourt (of the Ontario Civil Liberties Union), PHD 24 June 2020 – bitchute DOT com/video/xKHq1ixEYhQ/
youtube DOT com/watch?v=C1ODBTdNiG0 – Anti-Masker: Right or Selfish?
youtube DOT com/watch?v=FX95m5kXMBU Controversial Vaccine Movie Banned by Netflix & Apple – Jul 9 2020
youtube DOT com /watch?v=TPXyrab3oHc – Why Wearing A Mask Is Bad For Your Health – Real Doctors Know This

Fair Use Notice: Images/logos/graphics on this page contains some copyrighted material whose use has not been authorized by the copyright owners. We believe that this not-for-profit, educational, and/or criticism or commentary use on the Web constitutes a fair use of the copyrighted material (as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law).

CDC mask study

Nonpharmaceutical Measures for Pandemic Influenza in Nonhealthcare Settings—Personal Protective and Environmental Measures

Jingyi Xiao1, Eunice Y. C. Shiu1, Huizhi Gao, Jessica Y. Wong, Min W. Fong, Sukhyun Ryu, and Benjamin J. CowlingComments to Author
Author affiliations: University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China

Abstract

There were 3 influenza pandemics in the 20th century, and there has been 1 so far in the 21st century. Local, national, and international health authorities regularly update their plans for mitigating the next influenza pandemic in light of the latest available evidence on the effectiveness of various control measures in reducing transmission. Here, we review the evidence base on the effectiveness of nonpharmaceutical personal protective measures and environmental hygiene measures in nonhealthcare settings and discuss their potential inclusion in pandemic plans. Although mechanistic studies support the potential effect of hand hygiene or face masks, evidence from 14 randomized controlled trials of these measures did not support a substantial effect on transmission of laboratory-confirmed influenza. We similarly found limited evidence on the effectiveness of improved hygiene and environmental cleaning. We identified several major knowledge gaps requiring further research, most fundamentally an improved characterization of the modes of person-to-person transmission.

Influenza pandemics occur at irregular intervals when new strains of influenza A virus spread in humans (1). Influenza pandemics cause considerable health and social impact that exceeds that of typical seasonal (interpandemic) influenza epidemics. One of the characteristics of influenza pandemics is the high incidence of infections in all age groups because of the lack of population immunity. Although influenza vaccines are the cornerstone of seasonal influenza control, specific vaccines for a novel pandemic strain are not expected to be available for the first 5–6 months of the next pandemic. Antiviral drugs will be available in some locations to treat more severe infections but are unlikely to be available in the quantities that might be required to control transmission in the general community. Thus, efforts to control the next pandemic will rely largely on nonpharmaceutical interventions.

Most influenza virus infections cause mild and self-limiting disease; only a small fraction of case-patients require hospitalization. Therefore, influenza virus infections spread mainly in the community. Influenza virus is believed to be transmitted predominantly by respiratory droplets, but the size distribution of particles responsible for transmission remains unclear, and in particular, there is a lack of consensus on the role of fine particle aerosols in transmission (2,3). In healthcare settings, droplet precautions are recommended in addition to standard precautions for healthcare personnel when interacting with influenza patients and for all visitors during influenza seasons (4). Outside healthcare settings, hand hygiene is recommended in most national pandemic plans (5), and medical face masks were a common sight during the influenza pandemic in 2009. Hand hygiene has been proven to prevent many infectious diseases and might be considered a major component in influenza pandemic plans, whether or not it has proven effectiveness against influenza virus transmission, specifically because of its potential to reduce other infections and thereby reduce pressure on healthcare services.

In this article, we review the evidence base for personal protective measures and environmental hygiene measures, and specifically the evidence for the effectiveness of these measures in reducing transmission of laboratory-confirmed influenza in the community. We also discuss the implications of the evidence base for inclusion of these measures in pandemic plans.

Methods and Results

We conducted systematic reviews to evaluate the effectiveness of personal protective measures on influenza virus transmission, including hand hygiene, respiratory etiquette, and face masks, and a systematic review of surface and object cleaning as an environmental measure (Table 1). We searched 4 databases (Medline, PubMed, EMBASE, and CENTRAL) for literature in all languages. We aimed to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of each measure for laboratory-confirmed influenza outcomes for each of the measures because RCTs provide the highest quality of evidence. For respiratory etiquette and surface and object cleaning, because of a lack of RCTs for laboratory-confirmed influenza, we also searched for RCTs reporting effects of these interventions on influenza-like illness (ILI) and respiratory illness outcomes and then for observational studies on laboratory-confirmed influenza, ILI, and respiratory illness outcomes. For each review, 2 authors (E.Y.C.S. and J.X.) screened titles and abstracts and reviewed full texts independently.

We performed meta-analysis for hand hygiene and face mask interventions and estimated the effect of these measures on laboratory-confirmed influenza prevention by risk ratios (RRs). We used a fixed-effects model to estimate the overall effect in a pooled analysis or subgroup analysis. No overall effect would be generated if there was considerable heterogeneity on the basis of I2 statistic >75% (6). We performed quality assessment of evidence on hand hygiene and face mask interventions by using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach (7). We provide additional details of the search strategies, selection of articles, summaries of the selected articles, and quality assessment (Appendix).

Personal Protective Measures
Hand Hygiene

Thumbnail of Meta-analysis of risk ratios for the effect of hand hygiene with or without face mask use on laboratory-confirmed influenza from 10 randomized controlled trials with >11,000 participants. A) Hand hygiene alone; B) hand hygiene and face mask; C) hand hygiene with or without face mask. Pooled estimates were not made if there was high heterogeneity (I2 >75%). Squares indicate risk ratio for each of the included studies, horizontal lines indicate 95% CIs, dashed vertical lines indFigure 1. Meta-analysis of risk ratios for the effect of hand hygiene with or without face mask use on laboratory-confirmed influenza from 10 randomized controlled trials with >11,000 participants. A) Hand hygiene alone;…

We identified a recent systematic review by Wong et al. on RCTs designed to assess the efficacy of hand hygiene interventions against transmission of laboratory-confirmed influenza (8). We used this review as a starting point and then searched for additional literature published after 2013; we found 3 additional eligible articles published during the search period of January 1, 2013–August 13, 2018. In total, we identified 12 articles (920), of which 3 articles were from the updated search and 9 articles from Wong et al. (8). Two articles relied on the same underlying dataset (16,19); therefore, we counted these 2 articles as 1 study, which resulted in 11 RCTs. We further selected 10 studies with >10,000 participants for inclusion in the meta-analysis (Figure 1). We excluded 1 study from the meta-analysis because it provided estimates of infection risks only at the household level, not the individual level (20). We did not generate an overall pooled effect of hand hygiene only or of hand hygiene with or without face mask because of high heterogeneity in individual estimates (I2 87 and 82%, respectively). The effect of hand hygiene combined with face masks on laboratory-confirmed influenza was not statistically significant (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.73–1.13; I2 = 35%, p = 0.39). Some studies reported being underpowered because of limited sample size, and low adherence to hand hygiene interventions was observed in some studies.

We further analyzed the effect of hand hygiene by setting because transmission routes might vary in different settings. We found 6 studies in household settings examining the effect of hand hygiene with or without face masks, but the overall pooled effect was not statistically significant (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.86–1.27; I2 = 57%, p = 0.65) (Appendix Figure 4) (1115,17). The findings of 2 studies in school settings were different (Appendix Figure 5). A study conducted in the United States (16) showed no major effect of hand hygiene, whereas a study in Egypt (18) reported that hand hygiene reduced the risk for influenza by >50%. A pooled analysis of 2 studies in university residential halls reported a marginally significant protective effect of a combination of hand hygiene plus face masks worn by all residents (RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.21–1.08; I2 = 0%, p = 0.08) (Appendix Figure 6) (9,10).

In support of hand hygiene as an effective measure, experimental studies have reported that influenza virus could survive on human hands for a short time and could transmit between hands and contaminated surfaces (2,21). Some field studies reported that influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 and influenza A(H3N2) virus RNA and viable influenza virus could be detected on the hands of persons with laboratory-confirmed influenza (22,23), supporting the potential of direct and indirect contact transmission to play a role in the spread of influenza. Other experimental studies also demonstrated that hand hygiene could reduce or remove infectious influenza virus from human hands (24,25). However, results from our meta-analysis on RCTs did not provide evidence to support a protective effect of hand hygiene against transmission of laboratory-confirmed influenza. One study did report a major effect, but in this trial of hand hygiene in schools in Egypt, running water had to be installed and soap and hand-drying material had to be introduced into the intervention schools as part of the project (18). Therefore, the impact of hand hygiene might also be a reflection of the introduction of soap and running water into primary schools in a lower-income setting. If one considers all of the evidence from RCTs together, it is useful to note that some studies might have underestimated the true effect of hand hygiene because of the complexity of implementing these intervention studies. For instance, the control group would not typically have zero knowledge or use of hand hygiene, and the intervention group might not adhere to optimal hand hygiene practices (11,13,15).

Hand hygiene is also effective in preventing other infectious diseases, including diarrheal diseases and some respiratory diseases (8,26). The need for hand hygiene in disease prevention is well recognized among most communities. Hand hygiene has been accepted as a personal protective measure in >50% of national preparedness plans for pandemic influenza (5). Hand hygiene practice is commonly performed with soap and water, alcohol-based hand rub, or other waterless hand disinfectants, all of which are easily accessible, available, affordable, and well accepted in most communities. However, resource limitations in some areas are a concern when clean running water or alcohol-based hand rub are not available. There are few adverse effects of hand hygiene except for skin irritation caused by some hand hygiene products (27). However, because of certain social or religious practices, alcohol-based hand sanitizers might not be permitted in some locations (28). Compliance with proper hand hygiene practice tends to be low because habitual behaviors are difficult to change (29). Therefore, hand hygiene promotion programs are needed to advocate and encourage proper and effective hand hygiene.

Respiratory Etiquette

Respiratory etiquette is defined as covering the nose and mouth with a tissue or a mask (but not a hand) when coughing or sneezing, followed by proper disposal of used tissues, and proper hand hygiene after contact with respiratory secretions (30). Other descriptions of this measure have included turning the head and covering the mouth when coughing and coughing or sneezing into a sleeve or elbow, rather than a hand. The rationale for not coughing into hands is to prevent subsequent contamination of other surfaces or objects (31). We conducted a search on November 6, 2018, and identified literature that was available in the databases during 1946–November 5, 2018. We did not identify any published research on the effectiveness of respiratory etiquette in reducing the risk for laboratory-confirmed influenza or ILI. One observational study reported a similar incidence rate of self-reported respiratory illness (defined by >1 symptoms: cough, congestion, sore throat, sneezing, or breathing problems) among US pilgrims with or without practicing respiratory etiquette during the Hajj (32). The authors did not specify the type of respiratory etiquette used by participants in the study. A laboratory-based study reported that common respiratory etiquette, including covering the mouth by hands, tissue, or sleeve/arm, was fairly ineffective in blocking the release and dispersion of droplets into the surrounding environment on the basis of measurement of emitted droplets with a laser diffraction system (31).

Respiratory etiquette is often listed as a preventive measure for respiratory infections. However, there is a lack of scientific evidence to support this measure. Whether respiratory etiquette is an effective nonpharmaceutical intervention in preventing influenza virus transmission remains questionable, and worthy of further research.

Face Masks

Thumbnail of Meta-analysis of risk ratios for the effect of face mask use with or without enhanced hand hygiene on laboratory-confirmed influenza from 10 randomized controlled trials with >6,500 participants. A) Face mask use alone; B) face mask and hand hygiene; C) face mask with or without hand hygiene. Pooled estimates were not made if there was high heterogeneity (I2 >75%). Squares indicate risk ratio for each of the included studies, horizontal lines indicate 95% CIs, dashed vertical Figure 2. Meta-analysis of risk ratios for the effect of face mask use with or without enhanced hand hygiene on laboratory-confirmed influenza from 10 randomized controlled trials with >6,500 participants. A) Face mask…

In our systematic review, we identified 10 RCTs that reported estimates of the effectiveness of face masks in reducing laboratory-confirmed influenza virus infections in the community from literature published during 1946–July 27, 2018. In pooled analysis, we found no significant reduction in influenza transmission with the use of face masks (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.51–1.20; I2 = 30%, p = 0.25) (Figure 2). One study evaluated the use of masks among pilgrims from Australia during the Hajj pilgrimage and reported no major difference in the risk for laboratory-confirmed influenza virus infection in the control or mask group (33). Two studies in university settings assessed the effectiveness of face masks for primary protection by monitoring the incidence of laboratory-confirmed influenza among student hall residents for 5 months (9,10). The overall reduction in ILI or laboratory-confirmed influenza cases in the face mask group was not significant in either studies (9,10). Study designs in the 7 household studies were slightly different: 1 study provided face masks and P2 respirators for household contacts only (34), another study evaluated face mask use as a source control for infected persons only (35), and the remaining studies provided masks for the infected persons as well as their close contacts (1113,15,17). None of the household studies reported a significant reduction in secondary laboratory-confirmed influenza virus infections in the face mask group (1113,15,17,34,35). Most studies were underpowered because of limited sample size, and some studies also reported suboptimal adherence in the face mask group.

Disposable medical masks (also known as surgical masks) are loose-fitting devices that were designed to be worn by medical personnel to protect accidental contamination of patient wounds, and to protect the wearer against splashes or sprays of bodily fluids (36). There is limited evidence for their effectiveness in preventing influenza virus transmission either when worn by the infected person for source control or when worn by uninfected persons to reduce exposure. Our systematic review found no significant effect of face masks on transmission of laboratory-confirmed influenza.

We did not consider the use of respirators in the community. Respirators are tight-fitting masks that can protect the wearer from fine particles (37) and should provide better protection against influenza virus exposures when properly worn because of higher filtration efficiency. However, respirators, such as N95 and P2 masks, work best when they are fit-tested, and these masks will be in limited supply during the next pandemic. These specialist devices should be reserved for use in healthcare settings or in special subpopulations such as immunocompromised persons in the community, first responders, and those performing other critical community functions, as supplies permit.

In lower-income settings, it is more likely that reusable cloth masks will be used rather than disposable medical masks because of cost and availability (38). There are still few uncertainties in the practice of face mask use, such as who should wear the mask and how long it should be used for. In theory, transmission should be reduced the most if both infected members and other contacts wear masks, but compliance in uninfected close contacts could be a problem (12,34). Proper use of face masks is essential because improper use might increase the risk for transmission (39). Thus, education on the proper use and disposal of used face masks, including hand hygiene, is also needed.

Environmental Measures
Surface and Object Cleaning

For the search period from 1946 through October 14, 2018, we identified 2 RCTs and 1 observational study about surface and object cleaning measures for inclusion in our systematic review (4042). One RCT conducted in day care nurseries found that biweekly cleaning and disinfection of toys and linen reduced the detection of multiple viruses, including adenovirus, rhinovirus, and respiratory syncytial virus in the environment, but this intervention was not significant in reducing detection of influenza virus, and it had no major protective effect on acute respiratory illness (41). Another RCT found that hand hygiene with hand sanitizer together with surface disinfection reduced absenteeism related to gastrointestinal illness in elementary schools, but there was no major reduction in absenteeism related to respiratory illness (42). A cross-sectional study found that passive contact with bleach was associated with a major increase in self-reported influenza (40).

Given that influenza virus can survive on some surfaces for prolonged periods (43), and that cleaning or disinfection procedures can effectively reduce or inactivate influenza virus from surfaces and objects in experimental studies (44), there is a theoretical basis to believe that environmental cleaning could reduce influenza transmission. As an illustration of this proposal, a modeling study estimated that cleaning of extensively touched surfaces could reduce influenza A infection by 2% (45). However, most studies of influenza virus in the environment are based on detection of virus RNA by PCR, and few studies reported detection of viable virus.

Although we found no evidence that surface and object cleaning could reduce influenza transmission, this measure does have an established impact on prevention of other infectious diseases (42). It should be feasible to implement this measure in most settings, subject to the availability of water and cleaning products. Although irritation caused by cleaning products is limited, safety remains a concern because some cleaning products can be toxic or cause allergies (40).

Top

Discussion

In this review, we did not find evidence to support a protective effect of personal protective measures or environmental measures in reducing influenza transmission. Although these measures have mechanistic support based on our knowledge of how influenza is transmitted from person to person, randomized trials of hand hygiene and face masks have not demonstrated protection against laboratory-confirmed influenza, with 1 exception (18). We identified only 2 RCTs on environmental cleaning and no RCTs on cough etiquette.

Hand hygiene is a widely used intervention and has been shown to effectively reduce the transmission of gastrointestinal infections and respiratory infections (26). However, in our systematic review, updating the findings of Wong et al. (8), we did not find evidence of a major effect of hand hygiene on laboratory-confirmed influenza virus transmission (Figure 1). Nevertheless, hand hygiene might be included in influenza pandemic plans as part of general hygiene and infection prevention.

We did not find evidence that surgical-type face masks are effective in reducing laboratory-confirmed influenza transmission, either when worn by infected persons (source control) or by persons in the general community to reduce their susceptibility (Figure 2). However, as with hand hygiene, face masks might be able to reduce the transmission of other infections and therefore have value in an influenza pandemic when healthcare resources are stretched.

It is essential to note that the mechanisms of person-to-person transmission in the community have not been fully determined. Controversy remains over the role of transmission through fine-particle aerosols (3,46). Transmission by indirect contact requires transfer of viable virus from respiratory mucosa onto hands and other surfaces, survival on those surfaces, and successful inoculation into the respiratory mucosa of another person. All of these components of the transmission route have not been studied extensively. The impact of environmental factors, such as temperature and humidity, on influenza transmission is also uncertain (47). These uncertainties over basic transmission modes and mechanisms hinder the optimization of control measures.

In this review, we focused on 3 personal protective measures and 1 environmental measure. Other potential environmental measures include humidification in dry environments (48), increasing ventilation (49), and use of upper-room UV light (50), but there is limited evidence to support these measures. Further investigations on the effectiveness of respiratory etiquette and surface cleaning through conducting RCTs would be helpful to provide evidence with higher quality; evaluation of the effectiveness of these measures targeting specific population groups, such as immunocompromised persons, would also be beneficial (Table 2). Future cost-effectiveness evaluations could provide more support for the potential use of these measures. Further research on transmission modes and alternative interventions to reduce influenza transmission would be valuable in improving pandemic preparedness. Finally, although our review focused on nonpharmaceutical measures to be taken during influenza pandemics, the findings could also apply to severe seasonal influenza epidemics. Evidence from RCTs of hand hygiene or face masks did not support a substantial effect on transmission of laboratory-confirmed influenza, and limited evidence was available on other environmental measures.

Top

Ms. Xiao is a postgraduate student at the School of Public Health, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China. Her primary research interests are influenza epidemiology and the dynamics of person-to-person transmission.

Top

Acknowledgments

This study was conducted in preparation for the development of guidelines by the World Health Organization on the use of nonpharmaceutical interventions for pandemic influenza in nonmedical settings.

This study was supported by the World Health Organization. J.X. and M.W.F. were supported by the Collaborative Research Fund from the University Grants Committee of Hong Kong (project no. C7025-16G).

Top

References

  1. Uyeki  TMKatz  JMJernigan  DBNovel influenza A viruses and pandemic threats. Lancet2017;389:21724DOIExternal LinkPubMedExternal Link
  2. Bean  BMoore  BMSterner  BPeterson  LRGerding  DNBalfour  HH JrSurvival of influenza viruses on environmental surfaces. J Infect Dis1982;146:4751DOIExternal LinkPubMedExternal Link
  3. Tellier  RAerosol transmission of influenza A virus: a review of new studies. J R Soc Interface2009;6(Suppl 6):S78390DOIExternal LinkPubMedExternal Link
  4. Siegel  JDRhinehart  EJackson  MChiarello  LHealth Care Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. 2007 guideline for isolation precautions: preventing transmission of infectious agents in health care settings: Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2007.
  5. World Health Organization. Comparative analysis of national pandemic influenza preparedness plans, 2011 [cited 2019 Jun 25]. https://www.who.int/influenza/resources/documents/comparative_analysis_php_2011_en.pdfExternal Link
  6. Guyatt  GHOxman  ADKunz  RWoodcock  JBrozek  JHelfand  Met al.GRADE Working GroupGRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence—inconsistency. J Clin Epidemiol2011;64:1294302DOIExternal LinkPubMedExternal Link
  7. Guyatt  GOxman  ADAkl  EAKunz  RVist  GBrozek  Jet al. GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. J Clin Epidemiol2011;64:38394DOIExternal LinkPubMedExternal Link
  8. Wong  VWCowling  BJAiello  AEHand hygiene and risk of influenza virus infections in the community: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Epidemiol Infect2014;142:92232DOIExternal LinkPubMedExternal Link
  9. Aiello  AEMurray  GFPerez  VCoulborn  RMDavis  BMUddin  Met al. Mask use, hand hygiene, and seasonal influenza-like illness among young adults: a randomized intervention trial. J Infect Dis2010;201:4918DOIExternal LinkPubMedExternal Link
  10. Aiello  AEPerez  VCoulborn  RMDavis  BMUddin  MMonto  ASFacemasks, hand hygiene, and influenza among young adults: a randomized intervention trial. PLoS One2012;7:e29744. DOIExternal LinkPubMedExternal Link
  11. Cowling  BJChan  KHFang  VJCheng  CKFung  ROWai  Wet al. Facemasks and hand hygiene to prevent influenza transmission in households: a cluster randomized trial. Ann Intern Med2009;151:43746DOIExternal LinkPubMedExternal Link
  12. Cowling  BJFung  ROCheng  CKFang  VJChan  KHSeto  WHet al. Preliminary findings of a randomized trial of non-pharmaceutical interventions to prevent influenza transmission in households. PLoS One2008;3:e2101. DOIExternal LinkPubMedExternal Link
  13. Larson  ELFerng  YHWong-McLoughlin  JWang  SHaber  MMorse  SSImpact of non-pharmaceutical interventions on URIs and influenza in crowded, urban households. Public Health Rep2010;125:17891DOIExternal LinkPubMedExternal Link
  14. Ram  PKDiVita  MAKhatun-e-Jannat  KIslam  MKrytus  KCercone  Eet al. Impact of intensive handwashing promotion on secondary household influenza-like illness in rural bangladesh: findings from a randomized controlled trial. PLoS One2015;10:e0125200. DOIExternal LinkPubMedExternal Link
  15. Simmerman  JMSuntarattiwong  PLevy  JJarman  RGKaewchana  SGibbons  RVet al. Findings from a household randomized controlled trial of hand washing and face masks to reduce influenza transmission in Bangkok, Thailand. Influenza Other Respir Viruses2011;5:25667DOIExternal LinkPubMedExternal Link
  16. Stebbins  SCummings  DAStark  JHVukotich  CMitruka  KThompson  Wet al. Reduction in the incidence of influenza A but not influenza B associated with use of hand sanitizer and cough hygiene in schools: a randomized controlled trial. Pediatr Infect Dis J2011;30:9216DOIExternal LinkPubMedExternal Link
  17. Suess  TRemschmidt  CSchink  SBSchweiger  BNitsche  ASchroeder  Ket al. The role of facemasks and hand hygiene in the prevention of influenza transmission in households: results from a cluster randomised trial; Berlin, Germany, 2009-2011. BMC Infect Dis2012;12:26DOIExternal LinkPubMedExternal Link
  18. Talaat  MAfifi  SDueger  EEl-Ashry  NMarfin  AKandeel  Aet al. Effects of hand hygiene campaigns on incidence of laboratory-confirmed influenza and absenteeism in schoolchildren, Cairo, Egypt. Emerg Infect Dis2011;17:61925DOIExternal LinkPubMedExternal Link
  19. Azman  ASStark  JHAlthouse  BMVukotich  CJ JrStebbins  SBurke  DSet al. Household transmission of influenza A and B in a school-based study of non-pharmaceutical interventions. Epidemics2013;5:1816DOIExternal LinkPubMedExternal Link
  20. Levy  JWSuntarattiwong  PSimmerman  JMJarman  RGJohnson  KOlsen  SJet al. Increased hand washing reduces influenza virus surface contamination in Bangkok households, 2009-2010. Influenza Other Respir Viruses2014;8:136DOIExternal LinkPubMedExternal Link
  21. Mukherjee  DVCohen  BBovino  MEDesai  SWhittier  SLarson  ELSurvival of influenza virus on hands and fomites in community and laboratory settings. Am J Infect Control2012;40:5904DOIExternal LinkPubMedExternal Link
  22. Macias  AEde la Torre  AMoreno-Espinosa  SLeal  PEBourlon  MTRuiz-Palacios  GMControlling the novel A (H1N1) influenza virus: don’t touch your face! J Hosp Infect2009;73:2801DOIExternal LinkPubMedExternal Link
  23. Simmerman  JMSuntarattiwong  PLevy  JGibbons  RVCruz  CShaman  Jet al. Influenza virus contamination of common household surfaces during the 2009 influenza A (H1N1) pandemic in Bangkok, Thailand: implications for contact transmission. Clin Infect Dis2010;51:105361DOIExternal LinkPubMedExternal Link
  24. Grayson  MLMelvani  SDruce  JBarr  IGBallard  SAJohnson  PDet al. Efficacy of soap and water and alcohol-based hand-rub preparations against live H1N1 influenza virus on the hands of human volunteers. Clin Infect Dis2009;48:28591DOIExternal LinkPubMedExternal Link
  25. Larson  ELCohen  BBaxter  KAAnalysis of alcohol-based hand sanitizer delivery systems: efficacy of foam, gel, and wipes against influenza A (H1N1) virus on hands. Am J Infect Control2012;40:8069DOIExternal LinkPubMedExternal Link
  26. Aiello  AECoulborn  RMPerez  VLarson  ELEffect of hand hygiene on infectious disease risk in the community setting: a meta-analysis. Am J Public Health2008;98:137281DOIExternal LinkPubMedExternal Link
  27. Löffler  HKampf  GHand disinfection: how irritant are alcohols? J Hosp Infect2008;70(Suppl 1):448DOIExternal LinkPubMedExternal Link
  28. Ahmed  QAMemish  ZAAllegranzi  BPittet  DGlobal Patient Safety Challenge  WHOWHO Global Patient Safety ChallengeMuslim health-care workers and alcohol-based handrubs. Lancet2006;367:10257DOIExternal LinkPubMedExternal Link
  29. Pittet  DImproving adherence to hand hygiene practice: a multidisciplinary approach. Emerg Infect Dis2001;7:23440DOIExternal LinkPubMedExternal Link
  30. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Respiratory hygiene/cough etiquette in healthcare settings, 2009 [cited 2019 Jul 8]. https://www.cdc.gov/flu/professionals/infectioncontrol/resphygiene.htm
  31. Zayas  GChiang  MCWong  EMacDonald  FLange  CFSenthilselvan  Aet al. Effectiveness of cough etiquette maneuvers in disrupting the chain of transmission of infectious respiratory diseases. BMC Public Health2013;13:811DOIExternal LinkPubMedExternal Link
  32. Balaban  VStauffer  WMHammad  AAfgarshe  MAbd-Alla  MAhmed  Qet al. Protective practices and respiratory illness among US travelers to the 2009 Hajj. J Travel Med2012;19:1638DOIExternal LinkPubMedExternal Link
  33. Barasheed  OAlmasri  NBadahdah  AMHeron  LTaylor  JMcPhee  Ket al.Hajj Research TeamPilot randomised controlled trial to test effectiveness of facemasks in preventing influenza-like illness transmission among Australian Hajj pilgrims in 2011. Infect Disord Drug Targets2014;14:1106DOIExternal LinkPubMedExternal Link
  34. MacIntyre  CRCauchemez  SDwyer  DESeale  HCheung  PBrowne  Get al. Face mask use and control of respiratory virus transmission in households. Emerg Infect Dis2009;15:23341DOIExternal LinkPubMedExternal Link
  35. MacIntyre  CRZhang  YChughtai  AASeale  HZhang  DChu  Yet al. Cluster randomised controlled trial to examine medical mask use as source control for people with respiratory illness. BMJ Open2016;6:e012330. DOIExternal LinkPubMedExternal Link
  36. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Respirator fact sheet, 2012 [cited 2019 Jul 10]. https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/npptl/topics/respirators/factsheets/respsars.html
  37. Chughtai  AASeale  HMacIntyre  CRUse of cloth masks in the practice of infection control—evidence and policy gaps. Int J Infect Control. 2013;9:112DOIExternal Link
  38. World Health Organization. Advice on the use of masks in the community setting in Influenza A (H1N1) outbreaks, 2009 [cited 2019 Jul 10]. http://www.who.int/csr/resources/publications/Adviceusemaskscommunityrevised.pdfExternal Link
  39. Casas  LEspinosa  ABorràs-Santos  AJacobs  JKrop  EHeederik  Det al. Domestic use of bleach and infections in children: a multicentre cross-sectional study. Occup Environ Med2015;72:6024DOIExternal LinkPubMedExternal Link
  40. Ibfelt  TEngelund  EHSchultz  ACAndersen  LPEffect of cleaning and disinfection of toys on infectious diseases and micro-organisms in daycare nurseries. J Hosp Infect2015;89:10915DOIExternal LinkPubMedExternal Link
  41. Sandora  TJShih  MCGoldmann  DAReducing absenteeism from gastrointestinal and respiratory illness in elementary school students: a randomized, controlled trial of an infection-control intervention. Pediatrics2008;121:e155562DOIExternal LinkPubMedExternal Link
  42. Oxford  JBerezin  ENCourvalin  PDwyer  DEExner  MJana  LAet al. The survival of influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 virus on 4 household surfaces. Am J Infect Control2014;42:4235DOIExternal LinkPubMedExternal Link
  43. Tuladhar  EHazeleger  WCKoopmans  MZwietering  MHBeumer  RRDuizer  EResidual viral and bacterial contamination of surfaces after cleaning and disinfection. Appl Environ Microbiol2012;78:776975DOIExternal LinkPubMedExternal Link
  44. Zhang  NLi  YTransmission of influenza A in a student office based on realistic person-to-person contact and surface touch behaviour. Int J Environ Res Public Health2018;15:E1699. DOIExternal LinkPubMedExternal Link
  45. Shiu  EYCLeung  NHLCowling  BJControversy around airborne versus droplet transmission of respiratory viruses: implication for infection prevention. Curr Opin Infect Dis2019;32:3729DOIExternal LinkPubMedExternal Link
  46. Marr  LCTang  JWVan Mullekom  JLakdawala  SSMechanistic insights into the effect of humidity on airborne influenza virus survival, transmission and incidence. J R Soc Interface2019;16:20180298. DOIExternal LinkPubMedExternal Link
  47. Reiman  JMDas  BSindberg  GMUrban  MDHammerlund  MEMLee  HBet al. Humidity as a non-pharmaceutical intervention for influenza A. PLoS One2018;13:e0204337. DOIExternal LinkPubMedExternal Link
  48. Gao  XWei  JCowling  BJLi  YPotential impact of a ventilation intervention for influenza in the context of a dense indoor contact network in Hong Kong. Sci Total Environ2016;569-570:37381DOIExternal LinkPubMedExternal Link
  49. McDevitt  JJRudnick  SNRadonovich  LJAerosol susceptibility of influenza virus to UV-C light. Appl Environ Microbiol2012;78:16669DOIExternal LinkPubMedExternal Link

Top

Figures
Tables

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid2605.190994

Original Publication Date: February 06, 2020

1These first authors contributed equally to this article.

Table of Contents – Volume 26, Number 5—May 2020

Source:
ID Xiao J, Shiu E, Gao H, Wong JY, Fong MW, Ryu S, et al. Nonpharmaceutical Measures for Pandemic Influenza in Nonhealthcare Settings—Personal Protective and Environmental Measures. Emerg Infect Dis. 2020;26(5):967-975. https://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid2605.190994
AMA Xiao J, Shiu E, Gao H, et al. Nonpharmaceutical Measures for Pandemic Influenza in Nonhealthcare Settings—Personal Protective and Environmental Measures. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 2020;26(5):967-975. doi:10.3201/eid2605.190994.
APA Xiao, J., Shiu, E., Gao, H., Wong, J. Y., Fong, M. W., Ryu, S….Cowling, B. J. (2020). Nonpharmaceutical Measures for Pandemic Influenza in Nonhealthcare Settings—Personal Protective and Environmental Measures. Emerging Infectious Diseases26(5), 967-975. https://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid2605.190994.

AN INCONVENIENT COVID TRUTH

AN INCONVENIENT COVID TRUTH MIT, Duke, and Medical University of South Carolina graduate Dr. Andrew Kaufman, MD, joins Del for a mind-blowing discussion detailing what we actually know about the #COVID19 virus itself, and the very inconvenient truth every American needs to know.

#WhatIsCovid #InconvenientTruth #Covid #Coronavirus #TheHighWire #DelBigtree #AndrewKaufman

Time to end this scamdemic. No more masks, social distancing, vaccines, contact tracing.

Trump is on record saying: “The military will be giving the vaccine.” WHY IN THE HELL IS THE MILITARY GIVING THE VACCINE??

Need facts without fear
Del Bigtree, The Highwire
Ivor Cummins, The Fat Emperor, of Ireland
Cole Vernon, old man in a chair, Brit doctor speaking out
Pamela Popper, forgive the vegan propaganda, is calm and logical on the stupidity
Perspectives of the Pandemic
Knut Wittkowski
John Ioannidis
Dr David Brownstein, Vitamin C, melatonin, and Iodine treat the bugs
Doris Loh, ascorbic acid and melatonin, plenty and liberal. 10 to 100 grams C, divided doses, a day
10 mg to 100mg melatonin a day, divided doses, during illness. An excellent cytokine prevention. I have a kid with kidney disease and the M does wonders for getting her through fevers and viral illness
What the media is doing to Trump, made me a trumper. What Cuomo did to New York, forcing nursing homes to take diagnosed covid elderly, is appalling. The murders by ventilators, Dr Mark Sydell, ventilators were and are not proper treatment
Michael Levitt, interview on London Real
Zach Bush interview on London Real
Ben Crenshaw
senator Scott Jenson in USA
Dr Paul Marik, Vit C Therapy for ARDS
Eric Nepute
Dr Rashid Buttar
UnHerd , youtube channel
Hoover Institution, youtube, on covid, if certain videos weren’t deleted
One American News on youtube
Ron Paul Liberty Report
MRCTV youtube
and
PragerU / Candace Owens (Candace isn’t covid, just a super smart woman that the world needs to know about!!)
I could go on…

This coronavirus is the strangest virus I’ve ever heard of.

It’s very dangerous in the way it spreads. It is so mysterious the way it lurks in schools, but then dies at Home Depot. It can wreak havoc in churches; praying people are exceptionally vulnerable! Although it’s mind-boggling how it vanishes when people stand close together holding signs, destroying businesses, homes, property, monuments, etc. Yet, standing to watch a marathon or a concert triggers its wrath.

It is sneaky. It can spread when buying clothes at Kohl’s but not at Target. It is non-alcoholic. It can’t spread when you are buying beer. It lives for two days on Amazon boxes, you must wait 48 hours to touch them but it can’t survive on Dunkin Donuts coffee cups, so enjoying a hot cup of joe is safe.

It is the most curious thing, how it lives on basketballs, baseball bats and ballet bars, but dies on WWE ropes and Walmart shopping carts. It is spread by hair stylists, dog groomers, and dentists, but not by bank tellers, cashiers, and fast food workers.

It’s so smart. It won’t bother the first 10 people gathered but it knows when the 11th person shows up, so be careful if that’s you.! It even knows what you want vs. what you need. If you want a massage or your nails done it is very actively on the prowl and not even a mask can stop it, but if you need a plumber, it is weak, and a mask will keep it away. It also seems to be most dangerous after 5:30pm so businesses must start to close before the virus comes out of hiding and wreaks havoc upon the populations. It also requires dine-in restaurants to have a shorter menu and you use real plates but only plastic forks and spoons.

Whoever heard of such a clever, sneaky virus?!?

 Author Unknown

Fair Use Notice: Images/logos/graphics on this page contains some copyrighted material whose use has not been authorized by the copyright owners. We believe that this not-for-profit, educational, and/or criticism or commentary use on the Web constitutes a fair use of the copyrighted material (as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law).

It is just a 😷 masks! It is just a vaccine 💉

Why are we allowing a FEW people to manipulate SO MANY. When will the SO MANY rise up and say ENOUGH?

This coronavirus is the strangest virus I’ve ever heard of.

It’s very dangerous in the way it spreads. It is so mysterious the way it lurks in schools, but then dies at Home Depot. It can wreak havoc in churches; praying people are exceptionally vulnerable! Although it’s mind-boggling how it vanishes when people stand close together holding signs, destroying businesses, homes, property, monuments, etc. Yet, standing to watch a marathon or a concert triggers its wrath.

It is sneaky. It can spread when buying clothes at Kohl’s but not at Target. It is non-alcoholic. It can’t spread when you are buying beer. It lives for two days on Amazon boxes, you must wait 48 hours to touch them but it can’t survive on Dunkin Donuts coffee cups, so enjoying a hot cup of joe is safe.

It is the most curious thing, how it lives on basketballs, baseball bats and ballet bars, but dies on WWE ropes and Walmart shopping carts. It is spread by hair stylists, dog groomers, and dentists, but not by bank tellers, cashiers, and fast food workers.

It’s so smart. It won’t bother the first 10 people gathered but it knows when the 11th person shows up, so be careful if that’s you.! It even knows what you want vs. what you need. If you want a massage or your nails done it is very actively on the prowl and not even a mask can stop it, but if you need a plumber, it is weak, and a mask will keep it away. It also seems to be most dangerous after 5:30pm so businesses must start to close before the virus comes out of hiding and wreaks havoc upon the populations. It also requires dine-in restaurants to have a shorter menu and you use real plates but only plastic forks and spoons.

Whoever heard of such a clever, sneaky virus?!?

 Author Unknown

 

Fair Use Notice: Images/logos/graphics on this page contains some copyrighted material whose use has not been authorized by the copyright owners. We believe that this not-for-profit, educational, and/or criticism or commentary use on the Web constitutes a fair use of the copyrighted material (as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law).

Tekst van Ana Akkermann

Tekst van Ana Akkermann: Geloof me niet, doe je eigen onderzoek.

“Het is inmiddels overduidelijk dat Hugo de Jonge ons snel wil laten vaccineren tegen een virus dat gelijk staat aan een griep. Daarmee wil ik niet zeggen dat Corona een onschuldige ziekte is maar, de jaarlijkse griep heeft tot nu toe meer slachtoffers geeist. Ieder slachtoffer is er in alle gevallen één te veel.

Vaccineren tegen een virus dat muteert is sowieso zinloos. Is het ook niet vreemd dat het vaccin al zo snel ontwikkeld wordt?

Miljoenen worden er aan dit vaccin besteed terwijl dit geld ook besteed had kunnen worden aan het optimaliseren van de zorg. Of voor het ontwikkelen van ventilatie systemen. Óf aan een landelijke campagne om je immuunsysteem op peil te houden.

Je hoeft geen complotdenker te zijn om je te realiseren dat hier iets vreemds aan de hand is. Dus een vaccin i.p.v. al langer en eerder, veel goedkopere medicatie die met name in de beginfase doeltreffend blijkt te zijn. Ook zeer vreemd dat berichten met tips voor een goede gezondheid op sm verwijderd worden.

Tot slot een laatste feit: de entstof is een staatsgeheim. Huh…….. we worden min of meer verplicht ons te laten injecteren met een vloeistof waarvan wij de samenstelling niet mogen weten. En dan ook nog eens te bedenken dat de fabrikant van dit vaccin bewezen onbetrouwbaar is. En is er ook nog eens sprake van belangenverstrengeling daar de broer van Hugo voor dit bedrijf werkt.

Bovenstaande opsomming zal toch bij ieder weldenkend mens weerstand moeten oproepen. Ik kan mij werkelijk niet voorstellen dat jij jezelf of je kinderen hieraan zult blootstellen. Tja, tenzij de criminele brainwash vanuit de geïnstrueerde media jou te pakken heeft.

Moet je er nu tegen vechten of boos zijn? Nee, dat hoeft niet. Alles waar je tegen vecht krijgt macht en kracht. En deze kracht kun je beter bij jezelf houden. Dit doe je door te beseffen dat alle macht bij jou ligt. Je hebt keuze vrijheid, hoe lastig ook. Het is jouw kind en jouw goddelijke lijf. Niemand heeft het recht om over of voor jou te beslissen. Wanneer er dwang op staat is het namelijk ook nog eens een misdaad tegen de menselijkheid.

Je hoeft alleen maar “NEE” te zeggen. Als we dat allemaal doen kan Hugo de voorraad in zijn donkere kelder opslaan.
17 miljoen mensen die “NEE” zeggen en de rest van de snode plannen kunnen ook niet uitgerold worden. Want er zit nog meer in de planning… De vaccinatie was pas het begin van een wereldwijde ‘onderdrukking’ van de mensheid.

Wij draaien de piramide nu eindelijk om. Dat doen we heel simpel door wakker te worden aan de werkelijkheid, en onszelf onafhankelijk van het heersende systeem te maken.

Geen vaccinatie, niet vliegen? Oké, dan niet vliegen toch? Geen Covi paspoort, geen baan? Oké, dan niet werken. Moet je eens opletten hoe ze dan in paniek raken. Draai het om lieve mensen. Wij zijn machtiger dan het topje van de piramide.

Don’t believe me, do your own research.

Text by Ana Akkermann:

“It has become abundantly clear that Hugo de Jonge wants to get us vaccinated quickly against a virus that is equivalent to the flu. This is not to say that Corona is a harmless disease, but the annual flu has caused more victims so far. In every case, every victim is one too many.

Vaccination against a mutating virus is useless anyway. Isn’t it strange that the vaccine is being developed so quickly?

Millions are spent on this vaccine, while this money could also have been spent on optimizing care. Or for the development of ventilation systems. Or a national campaign to maintain your immune system.

You don’t have to be a conspiracy thinker to realize that something strange is going on here. So a vaccine instead of longer and earlier, much cheaper medication that proves to be effective, especially in the initial phase. Also very strange that messages with tips for good health are deleted on sm.

Finally, a final fact: the vaccine is a state secret. Huh …….. we are more or less obliged to be injected with a liquid of which we are not allowed to know the composition. And to think of the fact that the manufacturer of this vaccine is proven to be unreliable. And there is also a conflict of interest as Hugo’s brother works for this company.

The above summary will have to evoke resistance from every sensible person. I really cannot imagine that you will expose yourself or your children to this. Well, unless the criminal brainwash from the instructed media catches you.

Should you fight it now or be angry? No that is not necessary. Everything you fight gets power and strength. And you better keep this power to yourself. You do this by realizing that all power lies with you. You have freedom of choice, no matter how difficult. It is your child and your divine body. No one has the right to decide on or for you. When it is forced, it is also a crime against humanity.

You just have to say “NO”. If we all do that, Hugo can store the stock in his dark basement.
17 million people who say “NO” and the rest of the nefarious plans cannot be rolled out either. Because there is more in the planning … The vaccination was only the beginning of a global “oppression” of humanity.

We are finally turning the pyramid. We do this very simply by waking up to reality and making ourselves independent of the ruling system.

No vaccination, no flying? Okay, then don’t fly right? No Covi passport, no job? Okay, then don’t work. Look how they panic. It’s all about lovely people. We are more powerful than the tip of the pyramid.

Source:

https://www.youtube.com/post/UgxFZmT9txeeWvXrVyt4AaABCQ

Fair Use Notice: Images/logos/graphics on this page contains some copyrighted material whose use has not been authorized by the copyright owners. We believe that this not-for-profit, educational, and/or criticism or commentary use on the Web constitutes a fair use of the copyrighted material (as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law).

Challenging The Medical Mafia

Senator of Minnesota, Scott Jensen – He’s refusing to follow the orders of the new world system. So now they’re trying to destroy his life

Challenging the Medical Mafia will cause your job and livelihood…

Instead of allowing you to take a drug that has a proven track record as being extremely safe and effective over 90 of the time which costs 40 times less, this is an important discussion, because I was talking to a medical researcher today, who just can’t see The political conspiracy angle of all this, she is well intended a generation younger than I am, but sees no good motive for hospitals to hide the truth.
Well, here a couple of examples: I’m still reporting from just outside the four challenging the medical establishment, maybe the medical, deep state and exposing a massive flaw in our covert response.
My next two guests have found themselves on the wrong side of that medical mafia.
Here now is Scott Jenson, physician, Minnesota state, senator and Stephen Smith, founder of the Smith Center for infectious diseases and urban health Jensen.
02:47
You found legitimate flaws in the CDC’s guidelines now you’re being targeted by your state’s Health Board.
Explain briefly, basically, I’m being told that, because I questioned the Department of Health and the CDC’s communications that I’ve been spreading misinformation, I think this is ludicrous if you want to know who’s spreading misinformation.
If the governor comes out and tells Minnesotans they’re gonna have 74,000 deaths and then later on, reduces it to 29,000 deaths and then later on.
It gives us another statistic and says in mid-july, which is next week, we’re gonna have a thousand deaths per day.
To me that would be more misinformation than me saying: hey, listen, that certificates are serious thing and we should be doing it right.
Smith, you’ve been turned into a pariah of sorts by your own Hospital because of your advocacy for in use of successfully.
I might add, hydroxychloroquine tell us about it.
In the beginning, when I started adopted the French regimen, which was 600 milligrams a day, as opposed to the 2400 milligram lower dose that people were using the CDC actually the FDA had endorsed.
I got media push back from the CMO one of the hospitals.
We go into immediate, like we’ll, take it from here.
So even after I sent them the article, I said what give it a Saturday.
I was still Hospital working.
My tail off, I said: no, you won’t touch my patients since then I mean I don’t know why.
I had to be, I thought I know what’s creating controversy, I thought was just following the data like I always do and there’s a safe drug, a cheap drug and I got another working with the the CMO of the system.
He thought he said.
If we give everybody six hundred milligrams a day which is only you know, e6000 and supposed to 2400 milligrams, we’re gonna run out of a hydrogen Clerk, and I said I don’t believe him he hung up.
I mean that was after I yeah.
04:42
Maybe it’s three hours and taking care of 50 of his patients.
Well, today, earlier today, pouchy was asked: if we can control Co vyd without a vaccine watch, I think we can get it under control, but keeping it under control is gonna be the real problem.
This virus, to our dismay, is spectacularly efficient in transmitting from person to person.
That makes me skeptical whether we would get permanent, sustained control of this without having a vaccine.
Okay, Jenson the translation get ready to be locked down until Biden’s elected.
I’M sorry, I I hear that and my blood boils it is a virus.
05:33
It’S a bad virus, but most people do fine with it.
Could this be with us forever and vaccines are 100
useful anyway.
In most cases, I would ask Fauci why in the world he would use the word spectacularly.
That sounds like just fear-mongering, and I would ask him what RNA viruses have we been successful at in terms of creating a vaccine?
That really does what we want.
We know that, with our influenza vaccines, we frequently face just terribly mediocre results and if you look at other corona viruses, whether you’re talking about SARS or MERS, we don’t have a great track record.
So the fact of the matter is if a vaccine comes along to help us that’s great, but we’re far more realistically leaning into herd immunity, yeah the Henry Ford Health System, study on Hydrox ease come under fire.
Not only was the study not randomized, outside experts noting, but patients who received hydroxy were also more likely to get steroids Smith.
You’Ve read the study.

 

Source:

Fair Use Notice: Images/logos/graphics on this page contains some copyrighted material whose use has not been authorized by the copyright owners. We believe that this not-for-profit, educational, and/or criticism or commentary use on the Web constitutes a fair use of the copyrighted material (as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law).

La F4RSA del Virus

FORGERY & FRAUD AT THE CDC

COVID CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY? John Ziegler Goes Viral Over Lockdown; CA Mayor Defies Newsom Mask Order; Dr. Zelenko’s HCQ Protocol Saving Lives; Kids & Masks: Are They Safe?; ICAN Sues NIH…Again!

Dr Robert O. Young speaks out about COVID & other matters

PROFESIONALES DE ALEMANIA Y AUSTRIA REVELAN LA F4RSA

Profesionales de la comisión de investigación extra-parlamentaria de Alemania y Austria revelan la farsa.

Fair Use Notice: Images/logos/graphics on this page contains some copyrighted material whose use has not been authorized by the copyright owners. We believe that this not-for-profit, educational, and/or criticism or commentary use on the Web constitutes a fair use of the copyrighted material (as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law).

 

Censorship, DisInformation and MisInformation: Event 201

5 years ago, the idea that all the world’s elite were involved in a pedophile ring was considered to be a crazy conspiracy theory. Then we found out about Epstein.

Why are people so upset about .04% of the population dying?

And just for the record, is Bill Gates a doctor? Is he a politician? Can we charge Bill Gates with practicing medicine without a license?

The fact that vaccine makers are demanding immunity from civil liability is telling you everything you need to know about the efficacy of vaccines. We can be for transparency in vaccines without being conspiracy nuts!

All you need to know about the PLAN-DEMIC is here. Listen to how they KNEW WE will not believe their nonsense plandemic and how they have worked closely with social media to censor the TRUTH.

In recent weeks, many well-known YouTube channels have disappeared. Where did freedom of speech go?

It has become obvious to anyone paying attention and doing their own research that soon, there will be no other misinformation and disinformation (false information)  than the lies from governments and mainstream media.

They are working 24/7 to censor the truth. Soon, there will be no other narrative than their version of the story. Today is COVID, tomorrow mandatory vaccines. We live in a dangerous time.

Distrust the government, avoid mass media, fight the lies.

Misinformation is more contagious than the coronavirus!

Example: If you did not have a television, it wouldn’t be the number of people dying in the street that would scare you. It would be the number of people with masks and gloves all of a sudden.

“If you don’t watch the news you are uninformed. If you do watch the news you are misinformed”. -Denzel Washington.

The tone of the American representatives versus the rest of the world is alarming. The rest of the world seems more concerned with the actual safety and efficacy. The Americans only seem concerned about vaccine perception.

#WHO #UNICEF #HEALTH

CAUGHT ON CAMERA: W.H.O Scientists Question Safety Of Vaccines

2015 World Health Organization’s advice based on weak evidence, Canadian-led study says: “WHO recommendations have been extremely untrustworthy and not evidence-based,” said Dr. Gordon Guyatt, the study’s lead author…. Historically, WHO recommendations have been extremely untrustworthy and not evidence-based… Dr. Guyatt and other critics suggest the issue extends beyond the Geneva-based WHO. Many other health organizations are likely still issuing advice based on flimsy science, the product of an unstructured process humorously dubbed GOBSAT — “good old boys sitting around the table,” he said.”

Fair Use Notice: Images/logos/graphics on this page contains some copyrighted material whose use has not been authorized by the copyright owners. We believe that this not-for-profit, educational, and/or criticism or commentary use on the Web constitutes a fair use of the copyrighted material (as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law).

We are Big Pharma Slaves

Listen to Douglas and Tyla explain why America is in big trouble. This is a shocking finding that you need to scale to your friends and family. Contact your elected representatives immediately and demand that this legislation be terminated.

face mask genocide

Raw audio file: https://aim4truth.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Anthony-Fauci-and-WHO-Control-America.mp3

American Sovereignty is overthrown by the United Nation’s World Health Organization any time they “declare” a pandemic, and thus pull the strings of the CDC (Center for Disease Control and Prevention) and the NIH (National Institutes of Health) bringing all Americans (and the world) to their knees as slaves of bio-terrorism. The WHO hid the truth about COVID-19 as the Chinese knowingly lied and spread the man-made virus world-wide. The UN should be closed down because it is the opposite of what they say they are – the WHO actually spreads illness, poisonous vaccines, and tainted medicines. The WHO (CDC/NIH) now controls the world through a pharmaceutical, bio-war that is the latest of their attempts to destroy American sovereignty and overthrow the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights.

Surprisingly, there are U.S. laws that allow this to happen and to usurp the authority of the president and congress. It will come as a shock to many as they read the selections below, which where taken from government documents. American freedom is lost if we do not immediately rescind these laws and end any association with the United Nations and the public/private government vaccine monopoly called the CDC and its puppet the NIH. It seems that a “National Health Security” declaration of emergency trumps all other U.S. laws – and we are now subjected to the whims of these pharmaceutical overlords. Welcome to pharmaceutical tyranny! Awaken, and help rescind these national and international “laws” that strip American’s of freedom and liberty.

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response

 Public Health Emergency: Public Health and Medical Emergency Support for a Nation

Regulations and Laws That May Apply During a Pandemic

During a pandemic, certain legal authorities External, policies and regulations may apply and serve as the foundation for the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to respond.

Public Health Service Act

The Public Health Service (PHS) Act forms the foundation of the HHS’ legal authority for responding to public emergencies by authorizing the HHS Secretary to take key actions, such as lead all federal public health and medical response, declare a public health emergency, assist states in meeting health emergencies, maintain the Strategic National Stockpile, and control communicable diseases. The PHS Act was amended by the Pandemic and All-Hazards Preparedness Act (PAHPA) of 2006 and the Pandemic and All-Hazards Reauthorization Act (PAHPRA) of 2013 and again in 2019.

Issuing Declarations

Under the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, the President may declare an emergency at the request of the Governor of an affected State, or a Chief Executive of an affected Indian Tribe. The president can also declare an emergency without a Gubernatorial request if the primary responsibility for response rests with the Federal Government in order to provide expedited Federal assistance and support necessary.

The HHS Secretary may, under section 319 of the PHS Act determine that a disease or disorder presents a public health emergency; or that a public health emergency, including significant outbreaks of infectious disease or bioterrorist attacks, otherwise exists.  Following a section 319 declaration, the Secretary can take many actions during an influenza pandemic, including making grants; entering into contracts; and conducting and supporting investigations into the cause, treatment, or prevention of the disease or disorder, and waiving or modifying  certain Medicare, Medicaid, Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) and Health Insurance Portability Accountability Act (HIPAA) requirements. These waivers or modifications are permitted under Section 1135 of the Social Security Act to ensure sufficient health care items and services are available during a public health emergency.

Under the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act (PREP Act) of the PHS Act, the HHS Secretary is also authorized to issue a PREP Act declaration that provides immunity from liability (except for willful misconduct) for claims of loss caused, arising out of, relating to, or resulting from administration or use of countermeasures to diseases, threats and conditions determined by the Secretary to constitute a present, or credible risk of a future public health emergency to entities and individuals involved in the development, manufacture, testing, distribution, administration, and use of such countermeasures.  A PREP Act declaration is different from and not dependent on other emergency declarations.

The Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic (FD&C) Act is the foundation for Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA’s) authority and responsibility to protect and promote the public health by, among other things, ensuring the safety and effectiveness of human and veterinary drugs, biological products, and medical devices; and ensuring the safety and security of our nation’s food supply. Section 564 of the FD&C Act, authorizes the HHS Secretary to declare an emergency justifying the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) of medical countermeasures (MCMs) during public health emergencies. When an EUA is declared, the FDA Commissioner can allow either (a) the use of an unapproved medical product (e.g., drug, vaccine, or diagnostic device) or (b) the unapproved use of an approved medical product during an emergency to diagnose, treat, or prevent a serious or life-threatening disease or condition caused by a chemical, biological, radiological, or nuclear (CBRN) agent. For example, during the 2009 H1N1 influenza pandemic, the FDA approved the emergency use of antivirals for certain patients and health care settings. An EUA declaration can be made only when certain legal criteria are met and when scientific evidence is available to support the use during an emergency.

Public Health Emergency Medical Countermeasures Enterprise

The Public Health Emergency Medical Countermeasures Enterprise (PHEMCE) coordinates Federal efforts to enhance chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear threats (CBRN) and Emerging Infectious Diseases (EID) preparedness from a Medical Countermeasure (MCM) perspective. The PHEMCE is led by the HHS Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response (ASPR) and includes three primary HHS internal agency partners: the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the National Institutes of Health (NIH), as well as several interagency partners: the Department of Defense (DoD), the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA).

Public Health Emergency Declaration

The Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) may, under section 319 of the Public Health Service (PHS) Act, determine that: a) a disease or disorder presents a public health emergency (PHE); or b) that a public health emergency, including significant outbreaks of infectious disease or bioterrorist attacks, otherwise exists.

The declaration lasts for the duration of the emergency or 90 days but may be extended by the Secretary. Congress must be notified of the declaration within 48 hours, and relevant agencies, including the Department of Homeland Security, Department of Justice, and Federal Bureau of Investigation, must be kept informed. Prior to issuing the declaration, the Secretary should consult with public health officials as necessary.

Public Health Service Act

The PHS Act forms the foundation of HHS’ legal authority for responding to public health emergencies. Among other things, it authorizes the HHS Secretary to lead all Federal public health and medical response to public health emergencies and incidents covered by the National Response Framework; to direct the U.S. PHS and other components of the Department to respond to a public health emergency; to declare a Public Health Emergency (PHE) and take such actions as may be appropriate to respond to the PHE consistent with existing authorities; to assist states in meeting health emergencies; to control communicable diseases; to maintain the Strategic National Stockpile; to provide for the operation of the National Disaster Medical System; to establish and maintain a Medical Reserve Corps; and to potentially provide targeted immunity for covered countermeasures to manufacturers, distributors, certain classes of people involved in the administration of a program to deliver covered treatments to patients, and their employees. The PHS Act was amended by the Pandemic and All-Hazards Preparedness Act of 2006 (PAHPA) by the Pandemic and All-Hazards Preparedness Reauthorization Act of 2013 (PAHPRA), the 21st Century Cures Act of 2016, and most recently by the Pandemic and All Hazards Preparedness and Advancing Innovation Act of 2019 (PAHPAIA), which have broad implications for the Department’s preparedness and response activities.

W.H.O. Global One World Order

An epidemic of influenza is different from the dreaded pandemic that scientists and world health officials fear. We might see an epidemic of seasonal influenza during any given year. Flu reached epidemic levels in the U.S. for 10 weeks in a row during the 2004-2005 season. Records kept by the CDC show that during the week ending March 5, 2005, 8.9% of all deaths reported in 122 U.S. cities were due to influenza and pneumonia (a common complication of the flu).

The CDC’s definition of a flu epidemic relates to the percentage of deaths in a given week caused by influenza and pneumonia. The “epidemic threshold” is a certain percentage above what is considered normal for that period. The normal level, or baseline, is statistically determined based on data from past flu seasons.

See: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/COVID19/

cdc table

Seasonal flu epidemics may sicken millions, but those who die are typically a small number of the elderly, very young children, and people with weak immune systems, according to CDC statistics. That’s not the case during the worst influenza pandemics. There are two main features of an influenza pandemic. First, the virus is a new strain that has never infected people before. Second, it’s on a global scale. A pandemic is a global epidemic – an epidemic that spreads to more than one continent.

Influenza pandemics have struck about three times every century since the 1500s, or roughly every 10-50 years. There was one in 1957-1958 and one in 1968-1969. The most infamous pandemic flu of the 20th century, however, was that of 1918-1919. An estimated 40-100 million people died in less than a year, and what made it so different from seasonal flu epidemics is that it killed primarily young people, those aged 20-45.

Pandemic Influenza Preparedness and Response: A WHO Guidance Document.

The W.H.O. Pandemic Phases

The grouping and description of pandemic phases have been revised to make them easier to understand, more precise, and based upon observable phenomena.

The WHO pandemic phases were developed in 1999 and revised in 2005. The phases are applicable to the entire world and provide a global framework to aid countries in pandemic preparedness and response planning. In this revision, WHO has retained the use of a six-phased approach for easy incorporation of new recommendations and approaches into existing national preparedness and response plans. The grouping and description of pandemic phases have been revised to make them easier to understand, more precise, and based upon observable phenomena. Phases 1-3 correlate with preparedness, including capacity development and response planning activities, while Phases 4-6 clearly signal the need for response and mitigation efforts.

Definition of the Phases

In nature, influenza viruses circulate continuously among animals, especially birds. Even though such viruses might theoretically develop into pandemic viruses:

Phase 1, no viruses circulating among animals have been reported to cause infections in humans.

Phase 2, an animal influenza virus circulating among domesticated or wild animals is known to have caused infection in humans and is therefore considered a potential pandemic threat.

Phase 3, an animal or human-animal influenza reassortant virus has caused sporadic cases or small clusters of disease in people but has not resulted in human-to-human transmission sufficient to sustain community-level outbreaks. Limited human-to-human transmission may occur under some circumstances.

Phase 4, is characterized by verified human-to-human transmission of an animal or human-animal influenza reassortant virus able to cause “community-level outbreaks”. The ability to cause sustained disease outbreaks in a community marks a significant upwards shift in the risk of a pandemic. Any country that suspects or has verified such an event should urgently consult with WHO so that the situation can be jointly assessed and a decision made by the affected country if implementation of a rapid pandemic containment operation is warranted. Phase 4 indicates a significant increase in risk of a pandemic but does not necessarily mean that a pandemic is a forgone conclusion.

Phase 5, is characterized by human-to-human spread of the virus into at least two countries in one WHO region. While most countries will not be affected at this stage, the declaration of Phase 5 is a strong signal that a pandemic is imminent and that the time to finalize the organization, communication, and implementation of the planned mitigation measures is short.

Phase 6, the pandemic phase, is characterized by community level outbreaks in at least one other country in a different WHO region in addition to the criteria defined in Phase 5. Designation of this phase will indicate that a global pandemic is under way.

*     *     *

In the post-pandemic period, influenza disease activity will have returned to levels normally seen for seasonal influenza. It is expected that the pandemic virus will behave as a seasonal influenza A virus. At this stage, it is important to maintain surveillance and update pandemic preparedness and response plans accordingly. An intensive phase of recovery and evaluation may be required.

This phased approach is intended to help countries and other stakeholders to anticipate when certain situations will require decisions and decide at which point main actions should be implemented.

Individual State Response to Pandemics

Under the U.S. Constitution’s 10th Amendment and U.S. Supreme Court decisions over nearly 200 years, state governments have the primary authority to control the spread of dangerous diseases within their jurisdictions. The 10th Amendment, which gives states all powers not specifically given to the federal government, allows them the authority to take public health emergency actions, such as setting quarantines and business restrictions.

With states adopting emergency measures, there are several broad public health tools that governors can invoke. They can, for example, order quarantines to separate and restrict the movement of people who were exposed to a contagious disease to see if they become sick. They can also direct that those who are sick with a quarantinable communicable disease be isolated from people who are not sick. Curfews are another tool they can impose.

The power to quarantine and take even more stringent measures in the name of public health has belonged largely to the states for nearly 200 years. In 1824, the Supreme Court drew a clear line in Gibbons v. Ogden between the state and federal governments when it came to regulating activities within and between states. In a unanimous ruling, then-Chief Justice John Marshall cited the 10th Amendment in saying that police powers are largely reserved to states for activities within their borders.

In 1902, the Supreme Court directly addressed a state’s power to quarantine an entire geographical area. In Compagnie Francaise de Navigation a Vapeur v. Louisiana State Board of Health, the justices upheld a Louisiana Supreme Court decision that the state could enact and enforce quarantine laws unless Congress had decided to preempt them. Thus Louisiana could exclude healthy persons from an infested area populated with persons with a contagious or infectious disease (the Port of New Orleans), and that this power applied as well to persons seeking to enter the infected place, whether they came from within the state or not. The decision in Compagnie Francaise remains unchanged, and numerous courts have cited it as authority for state quarantines as recently as the Ebola outbreak.

Isolation and Quarantine 

Isolation and quarantine help protect the public by preventing exposure to people who have or may have a contagious disease. Isolation separates sick people with a quarantinable communicable disease from people who are not sick. Quarantine separates and restricts the movement of people who were exposed to a contagious disease to see if they become sick.

In addition to serving as medical functions, isolation and quarantine also are “police power” functions, derived from the right of the state to take action affecting individuals for the benefit of society.

The federal government derives its authority for isolation and quarantine from the Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution. Under section 361 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S. Code § 264), the U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services is authorized to take measures to prevent the entry and spread of communicable diseases from foreign countries into the United States and between states.

The authority for carrying out these functions on a daily basis has been delegated to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Under 42 Code of Federal Regulations parts 70 and 71CDC is authorized to detain, medically examine, and release persons arriving into the United States and traveling between states who are suspected of carrying these communicable diseases.

States have police power functions to protect the health, safety, and welfare of persons within their borders. To control the spread of disease within their borders, states have laws to enforce the use of isolation and quarantine.

These laws can vary from state to state and can be  specific or broad. In some states, local health authorities implement state law. In most states, breaking a quarantine order is a criminal misdemeanor.

If a quarantinable disease is suspected or identified, CDC may issue a federal isolation or quarantine order. Public health authorities at the federal, state, local, and tribal levels may sometimes seek help from police or other law enforcement officers to enforce a public health order. Breaking a federal quarantine order is punishable by fines and imprisonment.

Source:

We are Big Pharma Slaves

Fair Use Notice: Images/logos/graphics on this page contains some copyrighted material whose use has not been authorized by the copyright owners. We believe that this not-for-profit, educational, and/or criticism or commentary use on the Web constitutes a fair use of the copyrighted material (as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law).

BAYER TO PAY $9.6 BILLION TO SETTLE U.S. ROUNDUP SUITS

Bayer AG, the German company that owns the Roundup brand of glyphosate weed killer, will pay $9.6 billion to settle about 95,000 U.S. lawsuits alleging that the herbicide causes non-Hodgkins lymphoma, a form of cancer.

Roundup was developed by American chemical giant Monsanto, which Bayer bought for $63 billion in 2018.

TRENDPOST: Remember the big Climate Change trend, and how so many were so concerned about its implications before COVID Hysteria took center stage?

As Gerald Celente said during the height of it, “Climate Change, forget about it.
With all the poisons, chemicals, pesticides, GMO, they are injecting into our food and the trillions of tons they are injecting into the earth, water and air, we’ll be
dead before the climate changes.”

Source:

Trends Journal

The HighWire with Del Bigtree

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. The content in my videos and on the WORDPRESS – WORDPRESS channel are provided for informational purposes only. Use the information found in these videos as a starting point for conducting your own research and conduct your own due diligence BEFORE making any significant investing decisions. WORDPRESS assumes all information to be truthful and reliable; however, I cannot and do not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of this information. Thank you!

The White House Coronavirus Task Force – Fascists Take Over

The White House COVID-19 response team is made up of Big Pharma and Bill Gates operatives who are collaborating to destroy the U.S. economy in an effort to usher in the globalist agenda.

The next book written out will be about the Big Pharma take over of America.

4 – Dr. Fauci is on the Leadership Council for the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

3- Deborah Birx is a board member for the Global Fund to fight AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria, which is funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

5- Robert R. Redfield current director of the CDC, was the funder of the Institute of Human Virology, which has received over 31.8 million dollars from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

6-Seema Verma is the current administrator for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and has worked with Sue Desmond-Hellmann, the executive officer (CEO) of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

7-Alex Azar was president of Eli Lilly US Division and was involved in a class-action lawsuit (insulin).

8- Jerome Adams received a medical scholarship from Eli Lilly.

9- Stephen Hahn is the commissioner for the FDA and partner with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation in 2017.

10-Steven Mnuchin member of skull and bones at Yale University and partner with George Soros to create FMM Capital Management.

“Our Constitutional rights continue to be suppressed with no warrant,” Hunter Erickson said. “What if we wait another week (to end restrictions)? The virus will still be here. What are we waiting for? How much freedom are we willing to give up? There’s no science to warrant this type of lockdown. It’s time to fully reopen the county and state.”

Welcome to Medical Tyranny 20/20

#covid19 #coronavirus #fauci

Medical Tyranny 2020, exposing the people behind our “FACTS”

The Covid plandemic will be known as the biggest scam in modern history.

 

The Conspiracies Behind COVID-19 and How it Will Change Your Financial Future

The Global Health Mafia Protection Racket

BOOM revelations get bigger as we go along. Stay with me! Fauci, Event201, Foundations …and something called the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board. I expose the front organizations covering for the Global Health Mafia.

BOOM! Guess Who is Calling the Shots on Human Experimentation?

BARDA Whistleblower Links to Health Mafia

I look at Patrick Vallance & the UK’s formerly secret Science Advisory panel which leads me to more Global Health Mafia connections… and a connection back to the current self-described ‘whistleblower.’ Turns out they are all vaccine pushers, of course.

MORE Public Health Mafia Connections

Citizen journalists are on the case! More connections come to light. First half – Wuhan Virology Lab links Second half – Victor Dzau is EVERYWHERE. His fingers are in the MODELING as well! Also, more on Contact Tracing NGO ‘Partners in Health.’

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Medical Tyranny Big Pharma Bill Gates AI Immunity Passport Surveillance State!

Source:

Medical Tyranny 2020 – Watch

https://banned.video/watch?id=5e90f64db6024f0088761911

References: NYT Coronovirus Fundraiser: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/04/wo…

DZAU bio Ottawa Heart Institute: https://www.ottawaheart.ca/researcher…

GPMB Board of Directors: https://apps.who.int/gpmb/board.html

GPMB publication, Sept 2019: https://apps.who.int/gpmb/assets/annu…

Philanthropy News Digest: Klausner Fauci: https://philanthropynewsdigest.org/ne…

Johns Hopkins commissioned by the GPMB: https://www.centerforhealthsecurity.o…

Event 201 Players List: https://www.centerforhealthsecurity.o…

National Herald: https://www.nationalheraldindia.com/i…

Fauci Gates Foundation Grand Challenges board: https://gcgh.grandchallenges.org/abou…

VIDEO: Fauci “No doubt” of surprise outbreak: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DNXGA…

CEPI April pledges: https://cepi.net/news_cepi/belgium-an…

VIDEO: Victor Dzau at McGill “School of Population and Global Health: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ebylu…

Tedros worked for the Global Fund: https://www.theglobalfund.org/en/news…

VIDEO: Corbett Report on Gates domination of “Global Health” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wQSYd…

Fair Use Notice: Images/logos/graphics on this page contains some copyrighted material whose use has not been authorized by the copyright owners. We believe that this not-for-profit, educational, and/or criticism or commentary use on the Web constitutes a fair use of the copyrighted material (as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law).

The New Cases Scare is FAKE

From Panama, politicians took the 8,000 million they borrowed to combat COVID cases and stole the money. With less than 300 cases nationwide, all of a sudden, there has been an increase of up to 1000 cases per day.

Panamanian doctors were promised 6,000 dollars per each death certificate issued as COVID death while up to 20,000 dollars were offered for the use of ventilators and contaminated SWAB were used to contaminate jail cellmates and poor people. Now, the country is battling a high number of COVID cases.

Politicians, doctors, and hospitals are getting paid to FAKE COVID numbers.

These irregularities have been seen all over the world. From Colombia to Mexico to Honduras to Argentina, doctors and hospitals are getting paid to lie about COVID symptoms and COVID death.

Africa Spoke Up – Fake Positive Cases

You can read about FAKE cases numbers and how hospitals are getting paid in the United States  here

Florida (Fake) busy hospitals with Corona cases

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. The content in my videos and on the WORDPRESS – WORDPRESS channel are provided for informational purposes only. Use the information found in these videos as a starting point for conducting your own research and conduct your own due diligence BEFORE making any significant investing decisions. WORDPRESS assumes all information to be truthful and reliable; however, I cannot and do not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of this information. Thank you!

NEDERLAND is WAKKER!

NEDERLAND NU IN OPSTAND! Sta op Mensen. Samen sterk. Samen voor vrijheid.

WHO is een criminele organisatie, en ook de zogenaamde experts + wetenschappers. Totaalplaatje: 1 corrupte BENDE !!

Vrijheid Mars demonstratie | Den Haag 21

Ilegde vandaag bloemen bij het gemeentehuis.. ik sprak informeerde daar een vrouw wat ik kwam doen. ze was ongeveer 55. we houden een wake voor de democratie vertelde ik. ze was ook bang.. ze zag ook dat we voor de gek gehouden werden en dat we een enge tijd tegemoet gaan.. nu zie ik dit deze beelden. mensen realiseer je dat dit de top van de ijsberg is.. dit zijn de mensen die ondanks het verbod toch gegaan zijn. mensen die er 400 euro voor over hebben om hier toch te gaan staan.. die mevrouw vanmiddag zou hier natuurlijk nooit naartoe gaan. er zitten nog zoveel mensen thuis die deze gevoelens delen.. het zou de mainstream media goed doen dit verhaal te vertellen aan de burgers ..

CORONAVIRUS: DE WAARHEID EN WAT JE MOET WETEN

Fair Use Notice: Images/logos/graphics on this page contains some copyrighted material whose use has not been authorized by the copyright owners. We believe that this not-for-profit, educational, and/or criticism or commentary use on the Web constitutes a fair use of the copyrighted material (as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law).

The Spell Was Cast – 2012 London Olympics

“People still laughing at conspiracy theorists while locked in their own homes, voluntarily.”

“IF A PERSON HAS EYES TO SEE LET HIM SEE” 20/20 (vision)

The nurses and doctors DANCING in the 2012 predictive programmings Illuminati Olympic show ritual, about the coming plandemic….and in 2020, we have nurses and doctors filming themselves in the hospitals and streets doing DANCE routines during the plandemic.

Corona RITUAL Predictive Programming from 2012

Source:

CV-19 Predictive programming at London Games (2012): https://archive.org/details/2012-lond…
Schumer calls for nationalized testing: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6YCyW…
Medical Tyranny Video Exposes EVERYONE inTrump’s CV-19 Task force: https://twitter.com/crypt0k1ng/status…
Corbettreport “Lies, Damned Lies and CV Statistics: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k1trz…

Wolf of Wall Street Says This Is The Biggest Lie Ever Told https://youtu.be/bO7Z3m_OEf8

David Icke on being fearless https://youtu.be/UYexFRUoGww?t=1070

Indian Police Force Writing: https://www.npr.org/sections/coronavi…

Hospitals profiting from CV-19: https://revcycleintelligence.com/news/hospital-reimbursement-for-uninsured-covid-19-cases-may-total-42b

Who makes the money on testing: https://revcycleintelligence.com/news/cms-releases-medicare-reimbursement-details-for-covid-19-tests

 

Fair Use Notice: Images/logos/graphics on this page contains some copyrighted material whose use has not been authorized by the copyright owners. We believe that this not-for-profit, educational, and/or criticism or commentary use on the Web constitutes a fair use of the copyrighted material (as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law).

 

Still Loving You…PoisonYvs

Journey – Separate Ways (Worlds Apart) cover by Sershen&Zaritskaya feat. Kim and Shturmak

Source:

Scorpions on MV

Fair Use Notice: Images/logos/graphics on this page contains some copyrighted material whose use has not been authorized by the copyright owners. We believe that this not-for-profit, educational, and/or criticism or commentary use on the Web constitutes a fair use of the copyrighted material (as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law).

A little COVID humor and the Truth

Welcome to Slavelandia…Awaken yet?

Dr Fauci and The Mask Deception

Lies, Lies and Statistics – Corona Fake numbers as per Politicians and CDC

The WHO and the Mask Deception

They were here first – 1984

Fair Use Notice: Images/logos/graphics on this page contains some copyrighted material whose use has not been authorized by the copyright owners. We believe that this not-for-profit, educational, and/or criticism or commentary use on the Web constitutes a fair use of the copyrighted material (as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law).

Arrest Bill Gates – Echos the World

Who is behind COVID-19?

20:1 profit for Bill Gates if he gets to sell his vaccine to 7 billion people or 200 Billion dollars.

Diputada Italiana denuncia la Pandemia – Bill Gates crimes against humanity.

Italian Government calls for Arrest of Bill Gates for Crimes against humanity.

German congress woman speak out…

Positive Covid-19: A Goat, a Papaya. False Positive. PCR test has an 80 – 90% false-positive rate. In other words, 0% reliability and accuracy. Do not test. It is all fake.

Dr. Fauci has patents around vaccines and viruses. Who benefits from this plandemic?

Source:

Covid Is a Hoax Flyer: https://dollarvigilante.com/flyer/

Burundi Expels WHO: https://www.cuttingscore.com/burundi-…

Camera dei Deputati 14 maggio 2020: Sara Cunia exposes Bill Gates: https://youtu.be/iycQ3xPL4dc

Bill Gates in charge of NY schools now, Bloomberg pushing all tracking tech https://youtu.be/SOUXM7_jq_Y?t=926

When You Try to Earn A Living….then comes OSHA, CPS, Fines, Threats, Intimidation by STATE: https://youtu.be/9qeTAwenMqw

This part isn’t about a virus at all is it? It’s about following orders https://youtu.be/SOUXM7_jq_Y?t=123

UK Police Terrorist Deliberately Snaps Innocent Man’s hip: https://youtu.be/aRshSJ3KQQg

WTF?!? “You Have NO Right NOT to be VAXXED!!” – Alan Dershowitz https://youtu.be/XYpn2RWA-lE

This is what it currently takes to travel to Hong Kong: https://youtu.be/FzTLMeStjgI

What Really Makes you Ill book: https://amzn.to/2zDmum7

What Really Makes you Ill RFB: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q6FEY…\

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. The content in my videos and on the WORDPRESS – WORDPRESS channel are provided for informational purposes only. Use the information found in these videos as a starting point for conducting your own research and conduct your own due diligence BEFORE making any significant investing decisions. WORDPRESS assumes all information to be truthful and reliable; however, I cannot and do not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of this information. Thank you!

A Discussion with Dr. Sherri Tenpenny and Marcy Cravat

Notice what they call it: “the novel coronavirus”. A novel is a work of fiction.

Breathing in aluminum, strontium and barium must deplete our immune systems. Yes, it’s the elephant in the room!

Dr. Sherri Tenpenny & Dr. Andrew Kaufman sit down with award winning film maker/documentarian Marcy Cravat for a discussion. This is the first time these two very outspoken doctors ever got together for a chat. It’s just as mind blowing as you would expect! Marcy does a great job asking the relevant questions that are on everyone’s mind as well as a few questions that might surprise you. Brandon Smith does the intro and outro. Buckle up and grab your notebook! Check the links below for more content on these subjects.

“Everything the State says is a lie, and everything it has it has stolen.” ― Friedrich Nietzsche

Wild viruses have never proven to cause disease, or be infectious. “The culprit however, is not the microbe. It is the level of toxicity you have in your own blood stream.” — Good-Bye Germ Theory, Dr. William P. Trebing 2006

Germ Theory is pushed as fact by the nasty big pharma medical mafia that, ever since John Rockefeller used his oil baron money to control schools and institutions, steered legislation and public belief toward holistic medicine being seen as “quackery” because they couldn’t patent and profit from it. Terrain theory says we are expressing bacteria and viruses as solvents and alarm-messenger agents to other cells when our bodies are deficient and or poisoned. Scurvy was blamed on infection and proven to be a lack of vitamin C. When kids ate asbestos laden wall chips docs and scientists blamed their parents for being stupid, rather than themselves for blanketing the planet with harmful drugs, toxins and chemicals. The “progress” driven by the big money in the last couple centuries saw a lot of toxins from lead, arsenic, DDT, asbestos and many pesticides be splayed upon the public. When people got injured or sick their corrupt scientists blamed it on an “infectious” agent that is present during the very toxicity caused by their employers. These people are sick! They cause 500k deaths a yr. in America alone due to “medical errors” and over 100k due to legal drugs. “The most stunning statistic, however,  is that the total number of deaths caused by conventional medicine is an astounding 783,936 per year. It is now evident that the American medical system is the leading cause of death and injury in the US.” Dr. Gary Null, Death by Medicine “Allopathic doctors began amassing power as early as 1759. At that time, legislation was drafted to protect an ‘unsuspecting public’ against quacks or ‘snake oil salesmen.” – Death by Modern Medicine, Dr. Carolyn Dean The medical system in which modern MDs are trained (with Rockefller, Carnegie. etc. blood money) makes fundamental assumptions about disease and health based on the profitable THEORIES ingrained into their minds as fact. This training doesn’t equip modern physicians with the knowledge in human biology in relation to nutrition necessary to provide ‘healthcare’ for their patients, nor does it protect them from the harm caused by the medical treatments (legalized poisons that use synthetically rendered agents which mimick those found in nature). However, this training does emphatically provide them with the prestige and privilege to deal/prescribe drugs who’s manufacturers provide kickbacks which pad their salaries. Sadly, modern physicians have become glorified pushers that deal out toxic, enzyme-blocking drugs which momentarily stop symptoms (but not cure the condition) in the name of ‘healthcare’, contradicting the very hippocratic oath they swear upon. “Virus Mania is a social disease of our highly developed society. To cure it will require CONQUERING FEAR, fear being the most deadly contagious virus, most efficiently transmitted by the media.” – Etienne de Harven, MD Professor Emeritus of Pathology at the University of Toronto, Virus Mania Foreword by Etienne de Harven http://whale.to/a/virus_mania1.htm – So, here’s what we know so far: There’s no way to isolate CV-19 via the PCR test. – All the PCR test does is show CV dna markers which are incredibly common. – Viruses cannot be “caught”. Rather, they are expressed by our bodies. – These poor viruses we’re waging war against are more like firefighters trying to put out biological fires. – The death care industry kills nearly 1 million Americans per year between drugs, medical “errors” and unnecessary surgery and procedures, all while profiting big time. – We ALL contain viruses in our bodies as an expression of toxic cells – trillions in fact The very same medical, political and corporate mafia that creates immuno compromised people (radiation, drugs, gmos, fluoride, chemtrails, etc.) wants you to take more drugs and be scared of the unseen boogey man. That stress alone is deadly. Your body is incredible at keeping you healthy. You just need to treat it, feed it and keep it right.
REFERENCES: Virus Mania Foreword by Dr. Etienne de Harven (2008) http://whale.to/a/virus_mania1.html Biochemistry Debunks Corona https://youtu.be/l20Jzzhjp1k https://youtu.be/sVDuMk-WZqE Video – 150 U.S. Public Health Service Experiments from 1919 prove that disease is not transmittable https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=khec-jvZx9E Article – “You cannot Catch Bugs, Pasteur Debunked” https://www.healingnaturallybybee.com/you-cannot-catch-bugs-germs-bacteria-or-candidafungi/ Book / PDF – “Virus Mania: How the Medical Industry Continually Invents Epidemics, Making Billion-Dollar Profits At Our Expense” – Torsten Engelbrecht https://groups.io/g/RBTIclub/attachment/6/0/Virus%20Mania%20%20Torsten%20Engelbrecht.pdf Book – ‘Good-Bye Germ Theory’ is a book refuting the Germ Theory and talking about Vaccine Scam” https://www.amazon.com/Good-Bye-Germ-Theory-century-medical/dp/1413454402 Article – “Viruses. How Much Is That Dogma In The Window?” https://www.newmedicineonline.com/viruses/ Article – “Doctors refuting the Germ Theory” – By Dr. Bernarr, D.C., D.D :https://realrawfood.com/sites/default/files/article/CONTAGIOUS%20DISEASES%20and%20the%20GERM%20THEORY.pdf

Show less

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. The content in my videos and on the WORDPRESS – WORDPRESS channel are provided for informational purposes only. Use the information found in these videos as a starting point for conducting your own research and conduct your own due diligence BEFORE making any significant investing decisions. WORDPRESS assumes all information to be truthful and reliable; however, I cannot and do not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of this information. Thank you!

COVID IS A FRAUD – AND THE FACTS BACK IT UP

Want to Take Back Control of Your Money, Your Business, Your Assets and your Basic Human Rights?
Unchain Yourself from the Overlords’ Propaganda Machine and Fight Covid-19 with Knowledge and Truth

Symptoms of the Death Virus 
• Losing your freedom of movement
• Losing your freedom of expression
• Losing your job
• Losing your business
• Losing your home…

Cause of the Panic PLANdemic
• Intentional drive to create panic and fear
• Constant propaganda and misrepresentation of the
facts
• Inflated Covid-19 case numbers and purposely misclassified cause of death
• Confused and contradicting health “leadership” by
the government, the WHO and the CDC

Why? 
• Total world domination
• Financial enslavement
• One world government
• One world e-currency

How?
• Identification and control of every human on the planet through:
• Mass surveillance & Identity chips
• Forced vaccination
• Police Law & Community watch dogs

Effect: A New World Order
• National debt
• Business and personal bankruptcy
• World food shortages and famines
• Dollar collapse
• Credit crunch leading to hyperinflation
• Mortgage and loan payment acceleration
• Economic “stimulus” with imaginary money
• Over 30 million job losses just in the United States

= TOTAL CONTROL OF YOUR BODY, YOUR MONEY AND YOUR ASSETS
What happens next depends on you! Free Yourself and Survive the Economic Pandemic

Covid Flyer

Visit dollarvigilante.com/covid For Your FREE E-Book Describing
What Is Going On, Why and What You Can Do To Survive & Prosper Through This Globalist Agenda

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. The content in my videos and on the WORDPRESS – WORDPRESS channel are provided for informational purposes only. Use the information found in these videos as a starting point for conducting your own research and conduct your own due diligence BEFORE making any significant investing decisions. WORDPRESS assumes all information to be truthful and reliable; however, I cannot and do not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of this information. Thank you!

CONFIRMED COVID 19 Plandemic a Known, Live “Training & Simulation Exercise” under WHO

4 VERY IMPORTANT CHARTS https://www.screencast.com/t/3IiR0eFLCNn https://youtu.be/X7I5LzLgNSI

…the incarceration of people in their houses..

I called this pandemic a hoax from the beginning. It just didn’t feel right or like a natural occurrence.

Source:

Kurt Juergens Sr Guiding The Brides Home

FAIR USE NOTICE This video may contain copyrighted material; the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available for the purposes of criticism, comment, review and news reporting which constitute the fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. Not withstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work for purposes such as criticism, comment, review and news reporting is not an infringement of copyright.

How bad is covid really? (A Swedish doctor’s perspective)

Author: Sebastian Rushworth, M.D.

I am a practicing physician in Stockholm, Sweden. Every day I get asked questions by my patients about health, diet, exercise, supplements, and medications. There is a lot of misinformation on the internet and it is easy to get the wrong advice, and hard to tell what is right and what is wrong if you don’t have advanced scientific training. The purpose of this blog is to share what the science actually says.

Ok, I want to preface this article by stating that it is entirely anecdotal and based on my experience working as a doctor in the emergency room of one of the big hospitals in Stockholm, Sweden, and of living as a citizen in Sweden. As many people know, Sweden is perhaps the country that has taken the most relaxed attitude of any towards the covid pandemic. Unlike other countries, Sweden never went in to complete lockdown. Non-essential businesses have remained open, people have continued to go to cafés and restaurants, children have remained in school, and very few people have bothered with face masks in public.

Covid hit Stockholm like a storm in mid-March. One day I was seeing people with appendicitis and kidney stones, the usual things you see in the emergency room. The next day all those patients were gone and the only thing coming in to the hospital was covid. Practically everyone who was tested had covid, regardless of what the presenting symtom was. People came in with a nose bleed and they had covid. They came in with stomach pain and they had covid.

Then, after a few months, all the covid patients disappeared. It is now four months since the start of the pandemic, and I haven’t seen a single covid patient in over a month. When I do test someone because they have a cough or a fever, the test invariably comes back negative. At the peak three months back, a hundred people were dying a day of covid in Sweden, a country with a population of ten million. We are now down to around five people dying per day in the whole country, and that number continues to drop. Since people generally die around three weeks after infection, that means virtually no-one is getting infected any more. If we assume around 0.5 percent of those infected die (which I think is very generous, more on that later), then that means that three weeks back 1,000 people were getting infected per day in the whole country, which works out to a daily risk per person of getting infected of 1 in 10,000, which is miniscule. And remember, the risk of dying is at the very most 1 in 200 if you actually do get infected. And that was three weeks ago. Basically, covid is in all practical senses over and done with in Sweden. After four months.

In total covid has killed under 6,000 people in a country of ten million. A country with an annual death rate of around 100,000 people. Considering that 70% of those who have died of covid are over 80 years old, quite a few of those 6,000 would have died this year anyway. That makes covid a mere blip in terms of its effect on mortality.

That is why it is nonsensical to compare covid to other major pandemics, like the 1918 pandemic that killed tens of millions of people. Covid will never even come close to those numbers. And yet many countries have shut down their entire economies, stopped children going to school, and made large portions of their population unemployed in order to deal with this disease.

The media have been proclaiming that only a small percentage of the population have antibodies, and therefore it is impossible that herd immunity has developed. Well, if herd immunity hasn’t developed, where are all the sick people? Why has the rate of infection dropped so precipitously? Considering that most people in Sweden are leading their lives normally now, not socially distancing, not wearing masks, there should still be high rates of infection.

The reason we test for antibodies is because it is easy and cheap. Antibodies are in fact not the body’s main defence against virus infections. T-cells are. But T-cells are harder to measure than antibodies, so we don’t really do it clinically. It is quite possible to have T-cells that are specific for covid and thereby make you immune to the disease, without having any antibodies. Personally, I think this is what has happened. Everybody who works in the emergency room where I work has had the antibody test. Very few actually have antibodies. This is in spite of being exposed to huge numbers of infected people, including at the beginning of the pandemic, before we realized how widespread covid was, when no-one was wearing protective equipment.

I am not denying that covid is awful for the people who do get really sick or for the families of the people who die, just as it is awful for the families of people who die of cancer, or influenza, or an opioid overdose. But the size of the response in most of the world (not including Sweden) has been totally disproportionate to the size of the threat.

Sweden ripped the metaphorical band-aid off quickly and got the epidemic over and done with in a short amount of time, while the rest of the world has chosen to try to peel the band-aid off slowly. At present that means Sweden has one of the highest total death rates in the world. But covid is over in Sweden. People have gone back to their normal lives and barely anyone is getting infected any more. I am willing to bet that the countries that have shut down completely will see rates spike when they open up. If that is the case, then there won’t have been any point in shutting down in the first place, because all those countries are going to end up with the same number of dead at the end of the day anyway. Shutting down completely in order to decrease the total number of deaths only makes sense if you are willing to stay shut down until a vaccine is available. That could take years. No country is willing to wait that long.

Covid has at present killed less than 6000 in Sweden. It is very unlikely that the number of dead will go above 7,000. An average influenza year in Sweden, 700 people die of influenza. Does that mean covid is ten times worse than influenza? No, because influenza has been around for centuries while covid is completely new. In an average influenza year most people already have some level of immunity because they’ve been infected with a similar strain previously, or because they’re vaccinated. So it is quite possible, in fact likely, that the case fatality rate for covid is the same as for influenza, or only slightly higher, and the entire difference we have seen is due to the complete lack of any immunity in the population at the start of this pandemic.

This conclusion makes sense of the Swedish fatality numbers – if we’ve reached a point where there is hardly any active infection going on any more in Sweden in spite of the fact that there is barely any social distancing happening then that means at least 50% of the population has been infected already and have developed immunity, which is five million people. This number is perfectly reasonable if we assume a reproductive number for the virus of two: If each person infects two new, with a five day period between being infected and infecting others, and you start out with just one infected person in the country, then you will reach a point where several million are infected in just four months. If only 6000 are dead out of five million infected, that works out to a case fatality rate of 0.12 percent, roughly the same as regular old influenza, which no-one is the least bit frightened of, and which we don’t shut down our societies for.

If you liked this article, then please click the link at the bottom of this page to subscribe and receive future articles straight to your inbox.

Source:

How bad is covid really? (A Swedish doctor’s perspective)

FAIR USE NOTICE This video may contain copyrighted material; the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available for the purposes of criticism, comment, review and news reporting which constitute the fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. Not withstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work for purposes such as criticism, comment, review and news reporting is not an infringement of copyright.

Un-MASKing Faucism (Medical Tyranny)

Faucism / Fauchism Defined

Faucism / Fauchism: fauch´ism Pronunciation: fauch´iz’m

n. 1. A medical/political theory advocating an authoritarian hierarchical government; allegedly advocating health promotion at its core – opposed to personal liberty, democracy and liberalism.

2. An authoritarian system of government control under absolute control of a single medical or medical/political dictator, allowing no factual, scientific, theoretical medical or political opposition, forcibly suppressing dissent and rigidly controlling most medical/industrial and economic activities. Such regimes usually try to achieve popularity by a strongly authoritarian, medical supremacy and/or nationalistic appeal, often mixed with racism and xenophobia.

3. Specifically, the Faucist / Fauchist movement led by Dr. Anthony Fauci, FDA/CDC/NIH, Bill Gates/WHO/Gavi similar to the Fascist movement initiated by Benito Mussolini in Italy from 1922 to 1943.

4. Broadly, a tendency toward or support of a strongly medically/authoritarian or dictatorial control of persons, government, communication outlets or other entities and organizations; – often used pejoratively in this sense.-

Source:

The Health Freedom Medical Directive Cards

FAIR USE NOTICE This video may contain copyrighted material; the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available for the purposes of criticism, comment, review and news reporting which constitute the fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. Not withstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work for purposes such as criticism, comment, review and news reporting is not an infringement of copyright.

 

The deadly consequence of being silenced

Before COVID-19, a Harvard professor likened taking hydroxychloroquine to “multivitamins” for lupus patients, and Swiss Policy Research found huge decreases in hospitalizations and deaths from COVID-19 if patients were treated with hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and other drugs. In addition, a survey of more than 6,000 doctors from 30 different nations says HCQ is the best available treatment for COVID-19.

Liberty Counsel Action has compiled this data in a printable fact sheet for you that is available below.

In the face of these facts, however, entire states have threatened to revoke the licenses of doctors who prescribe HCQ. Pharmaceutical corporations are reporting doctors who do, while pharmacists across the nation are refusing to fill prescriptions for this medication.

Meanwhile, Big Tech corporations are censoring accurate medical information about this virus. I’ll talk below about how this is a critical moment.

I ask you to act now to get this important information directly on the desks and into the hands of our national and state leaders all across the nation, and to urge them to end this online censorship. Send your fax by clicking the button below. – Mat

In a survey of 6,200 medical doctors from 30 different nations, the plurality responded that they found that (HCQ) was the “most effective therapy amongst COVID-19 treatment from a list of 15 options.”i They also explained that HCQ was one of the top three most prescribed medicines for COVID.

On July 30, 2020, Swiss Policy Research (SPR) released the following updated findings: “US physicians reported an 84% decrease in hospitalization rates, a 50% decrease in mortality rates among already hospitalized patients (if treated early), and an improvement in the condition of patients often within hours of using a specific treatment. ii

However, doctors that dare to speak the truth on this subject are fired. They are threatened to be stripped of their licenses to practice medicine. They face horrific personal attacks. And in the end, their words are deleted from their own website and from social media and replaced with a hyperlink to the World Health Organization, which was caught pushing Communist China’s lie that COVID-19 “was not transmissible from person to person.”

Now it is time to demand the truth be heard. There is bipartisan frustration on Capitol Hill with these corporations, but both sides of the aisle need to be pushed to work together. Now is the moment to repeal the law that provides legal immunity to Big Tech social media and internet companies (Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act). In addition, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has the authority to regulate the companies that are censoring social media. The FCC needs to hear from you.

You can contact both through our faxing system. Thankfully, one thing that Big Tech cannot censor is your freedom to fax a message with this truth straight to the desks of our national legislators, bureaucrats and state leaders across our nation to demand change.

Make your voice heard to help demand an end to this censorship and the freedom for doctors to act in the best interest of their patients. Send your urgent fax today before more lives are lost.

If you want to believe the reported data, OurWorldInData stated that, in the first three days of this month, COVID-19 claimed an average of 1,100 lives every day in America. That is almost one death per minute, again, if you believe the numbers.

This illustrates how medical, technological, and political leadership in America—who do claim to believe the numbers—should be desperate to use the best treatment available. But instead, politicians are allowing Big Tech to silence highly qualified doctors who are speaking out about the treatments that are already known and used across the world.

Meanwhile, tech giants have silenced doctors on the frontlines, erased information they are freely sharing with others about the most effective treatments, and engaged with pharmaceutical giants who are involved in mafia-style reporting and punishment of anyone that points out the obvious … that the Emperor has no clothing.

There is a treatment for COVID-19. It was found to reduce the need for hospital visits by 80% and of those who do go to the hospital, it cuts their chances of dying in half and provides relief within hours of beginning the regimen.

But Americans can’t get a prescription from most doctors, and if they do, many pharmacies are refusing to fill it.

There needs to be an outcry across America that reaches every corner of Congress. To end this censorship and the Big Pharma monopoly blocking people from getting desperately needed medicine, those in authority need to hear from you. With hearings happening on the same week as blatant censorship of medical facts, now is the perfect time. Send your urgent fax to make your voice heard in D.C. right now.

Policies by design are general, thus each individual should seek the advice of their own physician. The best treatment protocol, according to data compiled by the SPR, included the following medications: “Zinc (50mg to 100mg per day), Hydroxychloroquine (400mg per day), Quercetin (500mg to 1000mg per day), Azithromycin (up to 500mg per day), and Heparin (usual dosage).”

This is one of the many facts, studies, medical opinions, and explanations included in Liberty Counsel Action’s printable fact sheet. We encourage you to print and share this with your doctor, county health board, city council, pastor, community leaders, and anyone else.

Right now, Google, Facebook, Twitter, and Squarespace have all been caught censoring, blocking, and deleting this data. I urge you to forward this email to your friends, loved ones, community leaders, and beyond. And we need help to get the word out.

I am so grateful for each and every one of you. Your prayers and donations are what allow our team to create and provide these resources to you. We want to see every American empowered to understand our current situation and what is at stake in our nation. If you can, give your best donation today to help us uncover the truth and prepare for the battles ahead.

When I see oppression, lies, and attacks against people who are trying to generously serve and save the lives of others in our nation, as the prophet Jeremiah says, “in my heart it becomes like a burning fire.” I want to see justice and I want to see it now. I urge you to pray with me for our nation, for those who are sick today, and for an end to this injustice against innocent lives. And then let us act together.

FAIR USE NOTICE This video may contain copyrighted material; the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available for the purposes of criticism, comment, review and news reporting which constitute the fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. Not withstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work for purposes such as criticism, comment, review and news reporting is not an infringement of copyright.

THE GLOBAL PUSHBACK HAS BEGUN

As Coronavirus panic in the media and from politicians continues, countries are continuing to institute mandatory masks & quarantine orders, by way of force and extreme consequences. Across Europe, millions took to the streets to push back against government overreach. Del speaks to one of the organizers of the rally in London.

Massive Protests

https://www.bitchute.com/video/DI1XLwWkMGTC/

#London #Berlin #StandUpX #BeBrave #Lockdown #MaskMandates #WeThePeople #TheHighWire

More Protests

https://www.bitchute.com/video/5y6a7NDbk6nh/

FAIR USE NOTICE This video may contain copyrighted material; the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available for the purposes of criticism, comment, review and news reporting which constitute the fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. Not withstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work for purposes such as criticism, comment, review and news reporting is not an infringement of copyright.

What does $10 vs. $5,720 have to do with COVID?

One way to evaluate two diametrically opposed medical viewpoints about COVID-19 is to follow the money. I’ll show you two big reasons that could be motivating Big Pharma to push one drug while censoring another.

Some years ago, when Big Tech was just beginning, Congress gave these companies legal immunity, which allows them to censor and silence your speech, including that of highly qualified doctors who are successfully treating COVID-19 patients.

But now, we have the opportunity to stop the censorship of vital information that could save your life.

Liberty Counsel Action is offering you a way to demand that this government-empowered censorship come to an end. Repealing Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act will allow constitutional lawsuits against these corporations for their censorship. In addition, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has the authority to protect speech through regulation of these Tech Giants. Urge both groups to act today with your critical fax. – Mat

While one drug is being enthusiastically pushed, the other is blocked on social media, erased from a private website, and anyone who speaks out about it faces intense personal attacks unrelated to the drug’s effectiveness.

The first drug is Remdesivir. The company Gilead Sciences is charging private insurance companies 520 dollars per dose for the new brand drug. The company recommends a range of between 6-11 doses, which means the per-person treatment can cost as much as 5,720 dollars for the drug alone.

Already the U.S. government has spent more than 1 billion of your tax dollars to buy 500,000 treatments of Remdesivir.

In contrast, hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) usually costs around 10 dollars for a treatment and it can be produced generically by many different providers.

Which drug would you prefer?

Keep in mind that the first drug, Remdesivir, had zero impact to decrease the number of deaths from COVID-19 – it merely shortens the recovery time and thus the length of stay in the hospital after a patient has already turned the corner.

The second drug, HCQ, cut the mortality of hospitalized COVID-19 patients in half. It has been shown to be very effective during the early stages of COVID.

Which drug would you prefer?

Remdesivir reported serious adverse effects in 1 in 5 patients. The reaction was so severe that 12% of patients had to discontinue the drug. Complications included hypoalbuminemia, hypokalemia, anemia, thrombocytopenia, constipation, and increased total bilirubin.

If taking the proper dose, the most severe side effects of HCQ are some diarrhea and occasional nausea (which can be mitigated by taking it with food).

Which drug would you prefer?

Right now, the government is protecting the Big Tech that is silencing facts about HCQ. This censorship of the truth is causing many state and national leaders to restrict or ban HCQ for COVID-19. And, do not underestimate the power of Big Pharma. Billions of dollars are at stake.

I want to warn every single freedom-loving patriot that this direct attack on our right to speak and receive information cannot be tolerated. If we allow it, this censorship will grow worse. I urge you to send a fax today demanding action in D.C. from Congress and the FCC, to protect free speech all across America.

Each time a treatment of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) works, that person won’t need Remdesivir. Most won’t need to be hospitalized either (A compilation of studies saw HCQ + other drugs reduce hospitalization by 80% for those with COVID-19).

Keep in mind that if a Medicaid COVID-19 patient goes on a ventilator there is a government bonus policy that (while it varies slightly by insurance-like accounting factors) is usually around 39,000 dollars for every COVID-19 patient a hospital treats in this manner.

It doesn’t take long in a pandemic for that money to add up. Just 25 COVID-19 patients on ventilators brings in almost a 1-million-dollar bonus to the hospital, which is over and above the regular Medicaid reimbursement.

I want to be clear. There are many amazing people in the medical field. Even members of my own family serve in this way. What I am calling out right now are the policies in America that are fundamentally backwards. We are financially motivating hospitals and private companies to profit from having COVID-19 patients end up on ventilators.

And the law that Congress passed to protect the Tech giants must be changed. President Trump has called for Section 230 of the law to be repealed and has directed the FTC and the FCC to issue rules to stop the censorship.

Enough is enough. We have a powerful opportunity with bi-partisan anger against these corporations to end their control over the American people and our constitutionally protected freedoms.

Send your fax to Congress and the FCC to act now to break the censorship stranglehold of these companies.

Now is the moment to send your fax to put an end to this censorship by Big Tech and big government programs and laws.

In case you missed it, yesterday my team released a powerful Hydroxychloroquine and COVID-19 Fact Sheet. You can find the link below. It compiles much of the research our team has found, all explained in one printable, shareable document. If you haven’t gotten your own copy, I urge you to download it today and share it with others—especially doctors in your community.

We can only continue to shine light into this darkness of censorship because of the generous donation of donors that helped us build the security that we need to keep information like this available on our website. With the launch of this information, I fully expect additional security attacks, and I ask you to donate today to help keep us in the battle against truth.

Thank you for your prayers and for your interest in this topic. Your prayers and support are the reason that Liberty Counsel Action can even exist to fight these battles and I am deeply grateful.

FAIR USE NOTICE This video may contain copyrighted material; the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available for the purposes of criticism, comment, review and news reporting which constitute the fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. Not withstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work for purposes such as criticism, comment, review and news reporting is not an infringement of copyright.

#SaveTheChildren

Facebook and Twitter shockingly deleted the words of President Trump from his page discussing timely, accurate information that radicals don’t want you to hear. Also, on Wednesday, Facebook even censored those wanting to rescue children from horrific abuse and human trafficking. The tech giant removed posts for #SaveTheChildren for opposing “community standards.”

Let that sink in.

These tech corporations feel powerful enough to silence the President of the United States. They feel invincible enough to publicly fight against rescuing trafficked children. And you can be confident they will censor you in a heartbeat (if they haven’t already).

I urge you to take one action. Join the fight pushing political authorities to stop this censorship. Congress can repeal Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act to allow lawsuits against these companies when they infringe on others’ constitutional rights. The Federal Communications Committee, and the Federal Trade Commission have the authority to end this immediately. Urge them to act now. Send your fax today. – Mat

What words of President Trump were deemed so “deadly” to deserve being erased by Facebook and Twitter?

“If you look at children, children are almost—and I would almost say definitely—but almost immune from this disease … they just don’t have a problem.”

The President described children as “almost immune.” However, Facebook cherry picked and changed the meaning of his words to just “immune,” without the qualifier. Then, based on its own fake characterization of the President’s words, Facebook claimed he was spreading false information.

Now let’s look at the facts. There are 73.6 million children in America. As of July, there have been 36 deaths of children attributed to COVID-19 nationwide. That’s less than 0.00005% of children in our nation. And very little is known about comorbidities or potentially misdiagnosing the cause of death in these 36 cases.

In contrast, on average 458 children die from the flu each year (2010-2019 numbers from the CDC). Yet our nation has never considered shutting down schools for the flu. Thus far, the seasonal flu is almost 13 times more deadly to the school-age population than COVID-19.

But radicals don’t want you to see the truth, they don’t want you to know the truth, and they can’t stand President Trump. I urge you to act now to restore the freedom of speech online for every single person in America. You can help make the difference and hold these Silicon Valley censors accountable.

Congress needs to immediately repeal Section 230 to allow individuals and organizations that have been harmed by this censorship to have their day in court. In addition, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) can establish rules to stop this censorship.

Send your fax today to demand that Congress and the FTC and the FCC act to protect our constitutional freedoms now.

What we are seeing in this censorship is a tech giant that is willing to change words from “almost immune” to “immune” and then, based on their own mischaracterization of the President’s words, claim what he said is false.

The President defined 99.99995% as “almost immune” and I’d say those numbers are pretty close. Facebook censored “almost” so they could also censor facts from the President of the United States. And they are getting away with it. We are seeing this Big Tech censorship intensify at an alarming rate. And the government is protecting these big corporations with a law on the books that denies any lawsuit coming against these Silicon Valley censors.

Help make this happen with your urgent fax to both commissions and demand an end to this censorship today.

If we look to our neighbor to the north, the entire country of Canada had only one child who died “from COVID-19.” It is not public how old she was, nor if she had any other preexisting conditions or comorbidities at the time of her death.

“In many of the cases where children have died after contracting COVID-19,” reported Canada’s #1 TV network, “there is little evidence that it was actually the virus that killed them.” Dr. Stephen Freedman, a Calgary-based pediatric emergency medicine physician and researcher said, “They often are high-risk children who have significant co-morbidities that place them at risk for significant outcomes with any virus.”

President Trump’s words “almost immune” were correct, and we are throwing the flag against the Big Tech community. They may not care about flags, but they will suddenly care if Congress removes their protective legal immunity. That is why we need to repeal Section 230 immediately. Send your fax to Congress, the FCC, and the FTC to change the rules and make a level playing field for our constitutional freedoms.

It’s our goal at Liberty Counsel Action to build an educated, organized army of peaceful patriots that can fight for our constitutional rights in the halls of Congress and bureaucratic offices all around our nation. We can only do this because of the faithful support of freedom-loving Americans who support our vision.

I encourage you to partner with our organization. The battle is intensifying, and, with your support, I want to mount a powerful defense of our freedom of speech and your right to receive information.

I want you to have the ability to see several perspectives and decide for yourself what is the truth—not to have some random person behind the scenes deciding what medical information you can and can’t have.

FAIR USE NOTICE This video may contain copyrighted material; the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available for the purposes of criticism, comment, review and news reporting which constitute the fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. Not withstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work for purposes such as criticism, comment, review and news reporting is not an infringement of copyright.

PRO-VAX LEADERS ISSUE WARNING FOR COVID-19 VACCINE

PRO-VAX LEADERS ISSUE WARNING FOR COVID-19 VACCINE
With a recent poll showing less than half of Americans would inject the Covid19 vaccine when released, it’s no wonder the country’s leading vaccine supporters have all signed a letter to the FDA warning of the importance of Phase 3 safety studies when it comes to this “warp speed” vaccine.

#Covid19 #VaccineUnicorn #Chihuahuacorn #Health #TheHighWire #DelBigtree

FAIR USE NOTICE This video may contain copyrighted material; the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available for the purposes of criticism, comment, review and news reporting which constitute the fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. Not withstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work for purposes such as criticism, comment, review and news reporting is not an infringement of copyright.